AI Overview...
- Mobile Phone Evidence Suppressed -
- Evidence indicates that A-1 was part of the group traveling in the Indica car and likely not using his mobile phone during the attack, as there are gaps in call logs suggesting no continuous usage during that period. The attack was confirmed to have ended by 2:00 p.m. SUSHIL ARORA VS STATE - Delhi
- Ownership details of mobile number 9999010588 were provided upon request, supporting the investigation. Call Detail Records (CDRs) were presented through the evidence of Israr, showing intervals in calls that imply no active mobile use during the critical period.
-
Additional evidence notes that A-1 made two calls to the PCR with intervals in between, but these calls do not necessarily indicate active mobile use during the attack itself, especially since the attack concluded before or around 2:00 p.m. SUSHIL ARORA Vs STATE - Delhi
-
Analysis and Conclusion -
- The main point is that mobile phone records and ownership details were examined, but the evidence suggests that the accused, A-1, was not actively using his mobile during the attack, which was over by 2:00 p.m. The gaps in call logs and the timing of calls support the conclusion that mobile evidence was suppressed or not directly linked to active involvement during the incident. This raises questions about the evidentiary value of mobile usage in establishing A-1's involvement at the time of the attack.
Search Results for "Mobile Phone Best Peice of Evidence Suppressed"
2017 0 Supreme(Del) 464 • India - Delhi
GITA MITTAL, R.K.GAUBA
A-1 is shown by evidence to be member of the group travelling in the Indica car. He would not have been using his mobile phone instrument mid-way the attack. There are gaps between the different calls logged by his mobile phone. The attack was definitely over by 2.00 p.m. ... & ownership of Mobile phone no. 9999010588 is enclosed herewith as requested by accused Hemant Garg. ... From the CDRs (Ex.DW5/A) brought on record through the evidence of Israr....
2017 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 577 • India - High Court of Delhi
A-1 is shown by evidence to be member of the group travelling in the Indica car. He would not have been using his mobile phone instrument mid-way the attack. There are gaps between the different calls logged by his mobile phone. The attack was definitely over by 2.00 p.m. ... He stated that he had given two calls to the PCR from his mobile phone with some interval in between. The PCR forms (Ex. ... Santro Car, No.DL 2 FF K 0002 was checked and one mobile#HL_....
