AI Overview...
- Murali Vijay's Net Worth – Main points and insights:
- The provided sources do not explicitly state Murali Vijay's current net worth in Rupees. Most references relate to corporate financial matters, legal proceedings, or other individuals.
- Some sources mention financial figures in Rupees, such as company valuations or penalties, but none specify Murali Vijay's personal net worth.
-
For example, references to net worth figures (e.g., Rs.1 crore, Rs.5 lakh, Rs.25,000) pertain to companies or legal penalties, not Vijay's personal wealth BNP Paribas VS United Breweries (Holdings) - Karnataka, State Bank of India VS Consortium of Mr. Murari Lal Jalan and Mr. Florian Fritsch - Supreme Court, STATE BANK OF INDIA vs THE CONSORTIUM OF MR. MURARI LAL JALAN AND MR. FLORIAN FRITSCH - Supreme Court, Union Of India VS Ganpati Dealcom Pvt. Ltd. - Supreme Court, Srinidhi Karti Chidambaram VS Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax - Madras.
-
Analysis and Conclusion:
- Based on the available data, there is no concrete information or credible source that provides Murali Vijay's net worth in Rupees.
- To accurately determine Murali Vijay's net worth, especially in Rupees, additional specific and updated sources such as financial disclosures, interviews, or credible celebrity wealth estimations are required.
Summary:
There is no available information in the provided sources regarding Murali Vijay's net worth in Rupees. Most references concern corporate finances, legal penalties, or unrelated individuals and entities.
Search Results for "Murali Vijay Net Worth in Rupees"
2013 0 Supreme(Kar) 845 • India - Karnataka
N.KUMAR, RATHNAKALA
If the transaction with Diageo goes through, there would be a further increase in the net worth of the respondent, which would be in a better position to pay of its creditors. ... As is clear from the material on record, the shares which was quoted at Rs.762/- one year prior to the agreement rose up to Rs.1,360/- in a span of one year without any marked change in the net worth of the USL. ... The respondent - Company has invested the balance sale consideration of Rs.379,75,6012 (Rupees three hundred sev....
2012 0 Supreme(AP) 738 • India - Andhra Pradesh
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
1956, seeking winding up of the respondent company – Held, In case respondent company’s audited financial statements show that net ... worth of respondent, for year ending 2012-13, continues to be negative these Company Petitions shall stand admitted automatically ... Its paid up capital is said to be Rupees Five lakhs consisting of 5000 shares of Rs.100/- each. ... Heritage Foods India Ltd., Hyd. ((2001) 5 ALD 80); P Sridevi W/o P Murali Krishna v. Cherishma Housing Private Ltd (2008 LAP 340)). ... Erosion of ....
2024 0 Supreme(SC) 1006 • India - Supreme Court
D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. B. PARDIWALA, MANOJ MISRA
, but may extend to one crore rupees, or with both.” ... A punishment of minimum one year which may extend up to five years or minimum fine of one Lakh which may be up to one Crore rupees, or both, has been prescribed for such a contravention. ... The net worth and financial capabilities of the Resolution Applicant are evident from its financial statements submitted at the time of submitting its EOI. Regarding the Source of Funds, the CIRP Costs shall be met out of funds infused by the Resolution Applicant in the Corpora....
2024 Supreme(Online)(SC) 11485 • India - Supreme Court of India
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ MISRA
, but may extend to one crore rupees, or with both.” ... A punishment of minimum one year which may extend up to five years or minimum fine of one Lakh which may be up to one Crore rupees, or both, has been prescribed for such a contravention. ... The net worth and financial capabilities of the Resolution Applicant are evident from its financial statements submitted at the time of submitting its EOI. Regarding the Source of Funds, the CIRP Costs shall be met out of funds infused by the Resolution Applicant in the Corpora....
2022 0 Supreme(SC) 843 • India - Supreme Court
N. V. RAMANA, KRISHNA MURARI, HIMA KOHLI
It is also pertinent to note that any person who fails to furnish information, is subjected to a penalty of 25,000/(Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand) under Section 5 4(A). ... 17.27 In Vijay Madanlal Choudary & Ors v. Union of India, SLP (Civ.) ... Such provision under the INCOME TAX ACT did not bar such benami transactions completely, rather it only attempted to legitimize and bring them into the net of taxation. ... Subsection (3A) authorises forest officers of rank not inferior to that of a Ranger, who or whose subordinate, has seized any....
2008 0 Supreme(Del) 130 • India - Delhi
MUKUL MUDGAL, SANJIV KHANNA
(a) in the case of first conviction, with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees or with both, and ... . ... (b) in the case of second or subsequent conviction with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years and with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees. ... Section 31. ... The decision of the Supreme Court in Murali Deora (supra) case has in fact extended the said principle. Section 5 has been explained and interpreted above. Section 22 of the Act,....
2025 2 Supreme 109 • India - Supreme Court
J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
Accordingly, the complainant issued a bearer cheque for an amount of Rs.7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakh only) which indisputably was encashed by the accused. d. ... Road, Kolkata for the amount of Rs.8,45,000/- (Rupees Eight lakh forty five thousand only). It is the case of the complainant that Rs. 7,00,000/- was lent by him by way of a bearer cheque and Rs. 1,45,000/- was subsequently lent in cash. ... Vijay D. Salvi reported in (2015) 9 SCC 622, the facts interestingly were virtually opposite to the facts of the case on hand. ... The othe....
2017 4 Supreme 6 • India - Supreme Court
PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE, AMITAVA ROY
AMOUNT TOTAL AMOUNT Amount (In Rupees ... Vis-a-vis item numbers 58 and 59, which represent the net income of Anjaneya Printers Pvt.
2018 0 Supreme(Mad) 4420 • India - Madras
S.MANIKUMAR, SUBRAMONIAM PRASAD
The address for service of the complainant is Shri.L.MURALI KRISHNAN, Special, Public Prosecutor, Income Tax Department, Government of India at Singapore Plaza, No.164 Linghi Chetty Street, Chennai - 600 001. 4. ... : Provided that this section shall not apply in respect of an asset, being one or more bank accounts having an aggregate balance which does not exceed a value equivalent to five hundred thousand rupees at any time during the previous year. ... In the profit and loss account submitted along with the original return, the collections have been fal....
1999 5 Supreme 60 • India - Supreme Court
S.S.M.QUADRI, D.P.WADHWA, K.T.THOMAS
Ganesh (PW-18, Music Director, who was giving his programme at the meeting before the arrival of Rajiv Gandhi; and Sundararajan Murali (PW-34 and Subramaniyan (PW-35 who give opinion regarding motive of LTTE against Rajiv Gandhi. ... Nalini told me that since the police had suspected her husband, he gave the. sum of Rupees twenty Five thousand and asked her to go with his brother and later he will come and bring her. ... "indian WIRELESS TELEGRAPHY ACT, 1933"6 (1-A) Whoever possesses any wireless transmitter in contravention of the provisions of Section 3 ....
Filter by Legal Phrase
