AI Overview...
-
Contempt of Court - The defendants were found to have violated court orders related to possession and construction, leading to contempt proceedings. Notices were issued in 2008 and 2009 for reply and compliance. L. Rs of Ram Dutt VS Nand Kumar - Rajasthan
-
Marriage Validity & Maintenance - The Family Court upheld the validity of Nandkumar Purohit's marriage and awarded monthly maintenance. The marriage was recognized under Hindu law, with evidence including the name of the purohit (Anjaneyulu) and the husband's testimony. V. Anandkumar vs M. Viswa Bharathi - Telangana
-
Mortgage Deeds & Property Rights - The court determined that certain deeds were usufructuary mortgages, not conditional sales, affecting the rights to redemption of land. The case referenced a precedent involving Pomal Kanji Govindji v. Urajlal K. Purohit, highlighting legal distinctions in property deeds. Md. Serajuddin VS Md. Abdul Khalique - Gauhati
-
Insurance & Business Documentation - Documents related to insurance claims and business activities, including payments and supply contracts, were examined. Nandkumar Bhatia was involved in a Rope Factory and food grain supply to the military, with relevant documents produced to support claims. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. VS Surgyan Singhaniya - Madhya Pradesh
-
Property Cancellation & Legal Claims - The court emphasized that unilateral cancellation of property documents is invalid; cancellation requires mutual consent or legal action. Main reliefs depend on the validity of conveyance and court orders. Vimal Builders VS Nand Kumar Anant Vaity - Bombay
-
Civil Revision & Court Proceedings - The court found that the plaint lacked disclosure and challenged the validity of a MoU, relying on various documents. The case involved procedural aspects under Order VII Rule 11 and the role of S.V. Purohit representing Sawan Nandkumar Bhatewara. SHRI SAWAN NANDKUMAR BHATEWARA vs INTERNATIONAL ASSET RECONSTRUCTION CO. PVT. LTD. NEW DELHI AND CORPORATE OFFICE AT MUMBAI AND ORS - Bombay
-
Evidence & Court Decisions - The courts upheld the original verdicts, noting that arguments raised before appellate courts were previously considered. Certain documents and evidence, including handwriting and signatures, were scrutinized, with the family court’s decisions maintained. X Husband VS Y Wife - Bombay
-
Landlord & Property Dispute - The petitioner’s advocate, Shri S.C. Mehadia, and other witnesses examined property details, including the total area of a mezzanine floor, to demonstrate possession. The case involved landlord-tenant disputes and property measurements. MAHAVIR TEA COMPANY VS ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, NAGPUR - Bombay
Analysis and Conclusion:
The collected documents depict a series of legal proceedings involving property disputes, marriage validation, contempt of court, and contractual rights. Nandkumar Purohit appears as a significant party in multiple cases, including property deeds, marriage maintenance, and procedural litigation. The legal focus revolves around the validity of documents, adherence to court orders, and the assessment of evidence in property and family law contexts. These cases collectively highlight Purohit’s involvement in complex civil and family matters, with courts emphasizing procedural correctness and substantive legal principles.
Search Results for "Nandkumar Purohit Court Documents"
2010 0 Supreme(Raj) 1236 • India - Rajasthan
VINEET KOTHARI
It has been clear that the contempt of court has been done by the defendants and the defendents are directed to be produced before ... vacant possession along with the construction to the plaintiff have not been complied with – There is a violation of the order of court ... With these documents in the present contempt petition, this Court took cognizance and issued notices to respondent on 15/10/2008. Thereafter, on 26/10/2009 again time was granted to the respondent to file reply to the contempt petition. ... ....
2024 0 Supreme(Telangana) 1232 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.LAKSHMAN, P.SREE SUDHA
... ... Findings of Court: ... The Family Court held that the marriage was valid and granted monthly maintenance. ... The Family Court recognized the marriage and awarded maintenance. ... Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Appellant disputes the validity of marriage and obligation for maintenance - Family Court ... She has also revealed the name of purohit as Anjaneyulu, who died in the year 1995 or 1996. 32. ... To prove the claim, the husband examined himself as PW.1 and filed Exs.P.1 to P.2....
2003 0 Supreme(Gau) 362 • India - Gauhati
S.K.KAR
Finding of the Court: The court found that the deeds were usufructuary mortgages, not conditional sales, and that the ... The court analyzed the nature of the deeds, the rights of the parties, and the evidence presented. ... Mortgage Deeds - Redemption of Suit Land - Section 58 of the Transfer of Property Act - Sections 91 and 92 of the Evidence Act - The court ... In the same judgment the Hon'ble Apex Court referring to the case of Pomal Kanji Govindji v. Urajlal K. Purohit in last ....
1997 0 Supreme(MP) 613 • India - Madhya Pradesh
R.D.SHUKLA, SHAMBHOO SINGH
insurance policy not got produced by Tribunal despite dispute about liability -- insurer makes the payment out of public money -- High Court ... Nandkumar Bhatia who is shown as respondent No.8 in the appeal. ... 49. As a result, appeal succeeds partly. ... He produced documents Ex. P/3 to Ex. P/34. He has further stated that he had started the Rope Factory in Seoni (MP) and was supplying food grains to Military. The business was being conducted in the name of Firm' 'Sethmal Jainarain". He has produced Ex. P/35, P/36 and P/37. ... The mot....
2013 0 Supreme(Bom) 996 • India - Bombay
ROSHAN DALVI
It may be mentioned that what cannot be claimed by the direct vendors in a document cannot be claimed by parties claiming to be their ... It may be mentioned that no cancellation of the document can take place unilaterally by a party. The party desiring of cancelling the document must do so with consent of other party or by an action at law in a Court of law. ... If the conveyance remains at that and is not set aside or cancelled by the Court, the main reliefs under prayers (a) and (b) of the suit canno....
2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 363 • India - High Court of Bombay
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE URMILA SACHIN JOSHI- PHALKE
(Paras 1, 10) ... ... Findings of Court: ... The court ruled that the plaint did not disclose ... The court found that the plaintiffs did not challenge the compromise decree and relied on an uncertified MoU. ... 1908 - Order VII Rule 11 - Civil Revision Applications challenging the rejection of applications under Order VII Rule 11 - The court ... upon various documents. ... Learned counsel Shri S.V.Purohit, appearing for Sawan Nandkumar Bhatewara (non-applicant No.....
2014 0 Supreme(Bom) 1690 • India - Bombay
S.S.SHINDE, P.R.BORA
Court does not find any reason to interfere in the conclusion so recorded by the trial Court. ... On perusal of the order passed by the trial Court it is revealed that the points which are argued and pressed before this Court were ... argued and pressed even before the trial Court and considering the points so raised the trial Court find it proper to sentence accused ... and as such contents of the said documents cannot be held to have been proved. ... Nandk....
2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 364 • India - High Court of Bombay
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE URMILA SACHIN JOSHI- PHALKE
113, 114) ... ... Facts of the case: ... The applicants, Praharsh Corporation Private Limited and Sawan Nandkumar ... (Paras 1, 10) ... ... Findings of Court: ... The court found that the plaint did not disclose ... as an estoppel and is binding unless set aside by the court that recorded it. ... upon various documents. ... Learned counsel Shri S.V.Purohit, appearing for Sawan Nandkumar Bhatewara (non-applicant No. in Civil Revision Application No./0 and applica....
2016 0 Supreme(Bom) 43 • India - Bombay
R.M.BORDE, A.I.S.CHEEMA
... Result – Family Court Appeal allowed. ... She has even led evidence of a handwriting expert, RW2 Nandkumar to claim that the signature on Exhibit 84 was not of hers, although in the criminal case bearing RCC No.414 of 2004, evidence came on record of Head Constable Shaikhnath Adhane that on 29th November 2002 he was given original of this document ... RW6 Satish Purohit was examined to prove Tipan Exhibit 168 that when the engagement took place, marriage was initially scheduled for 27th December 2012. ... 8. ... Lea....
2006 0 Supreme(Bom) 221 • India - Bombay
B.P.DHARMADHIKARI
Purohit for petitioners, Advocate Shri s. C. Mehadia for respondent No. 2. Learned A. G. P. appears for respondent No. 1-Additional Collector. ... The respondent No. 2-landlord examined himself and his son Mohan Upadhya, while the present petitioners examined its Manager by name Sushil Kumar hansraj Bothara, one architect by name Shri Nandkumar Asarkar and one employee of Nagpur Improvement Trust in order to demonstrate the total area in possession ... According to Advocate Shri Purohit the total area of mezzanine floor was shown to be mu....
Filter by Legal Phrase
