AI Overview...
- Nishant Sareen - Main points and insights:
- Served as Drug Inspector in Bilaspur and was transferred to Chamba; allegations of personal enmity involved NISHANT SAREEN VS STATE OF H. P. - Himachal Pradesh.
- Was involved in a case where he was caught accepting bribes, with judicial proceedings referencing his conduct and sanctions related to prosecution Deepak Khinchi VS State of Rajasthan - Supreme Court.
- Supreme Court case (2010) 14 SCC 527 discusses the importance of proper sanctioning authority and procedural compliance before prosecution; emphasizes that relevant documents must be considered and that opinions from Attorney Generals are not substantive evidence Prakash Chandra Mishra, son of late Dibya Singh Mishra VS State of Jharkhand through Vigilance - Jharkhand, Ashok Kumar Aswal VS UOI - Delhi, Sandeep Silas VS CBI - Delhi.
- Involved in legal proceedings concerning the legality of prosecution and sanctions, with judgments highlighting the necessity of proper authorization and adherence to legal procedures Vivek Batra VS Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue - Bombay, Vivek Batra VS Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue - Bombay.
-
Cases also reference issues related to powers of attorney and procedural irregularities in legal notices and complaints Bharatbhai Patel VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat.
-
Analysis and Conclusion:
- Nishant Sareen's legal history includes allegations of corruption, disciplinary transfers, and involvement in criminal proceedings related to accepting bribes.
- His cases often revolve around procedural legality, especially the requirement for proper sanctions and documentation before initiating prosecution, as clarified by Supreme Court rulings.
- Overall, Nishant Sareen's profile indicates a contentious legal background with significant focus on procedural compliance in legal and disciplinary actions NISHANT SAREEN VS STATE OF H. P. - Himachal Pradesh, Deepak Khinchi VS State of Rajasthan - Supreme Court, Prakash Chandra Mishra, son of late Dibya Singh Mishra VS State of Jharkhand through Vigilance - Jharkhand, Ashok Kumar Aswal VS UOI - Delhi, Sandeep Silas VS CBI - Delhi, Vivek Batra VS Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue - Bombay, Vivek Batra VS Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue - Bombay, Bharatbhai Patel VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat.
Search Results for "Nishant Sareen Attorney Information"
2009 0 Supreme(HP) 401 • India - Himachal Pradesh
SURINDER SINGH
Nishant Sareen while working as Drug Inspector, Bilaspur as reported by the Vigilance Department on information of Sh.Ramdhan Sharma ... Nishant Sareen was transferred from Bilaspur to chamba vide Govt. ... Nishant Sareen, Drug Inspector as it appears to be a case of Personal enmity.
2012 3 Supreme 569 • India - Supreme Court
RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, AFTAB ALAM
In Nishant Sareen, the respondent therein was caught red-handed accepting bribe from the complainant. ... To these facts, judgment in Nishant Sareen, where sanction was refused earlier by the Principal Secretary (Health) and was granted ... Nishant Sareen2 [(2010) 14 SCC 527]. ... 9.
2020 0 Supreme(AP) 458 • India - Andhra Pradesh
CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
Nishant Sareen, (2010) 14 SCC 527 have absolutely no application to the present facts of the case. ... Rule 9 thereof says that no person shall submit tender on behalf of any other person unless he holds a power of attorney for such ... On receipt of reliable information relating to the above illegalities and irregularities being committed by accused Nos.1 and 2 in
2011 0 Supreme(P&H) 1989 • India - Punjab and Haryana
PERMOD KOHLI
Sanction for Prosecution--Opinions formulated by two Attorney Generals of India--Cannot be relied upon either by the prosecution ... ;Primacy has to be accorded to the opinion of the Investigating Agency/Officer and no other opinion including that of the Attorney ... does not constitute a substantive evidence or material--In any case, relevant part of the opinions formulated by the two learned Attorney ... Nishant #HL_STAR....
2020 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1016 • India - Jharkhand
ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Nishant Sareen); Paras-7 and 9; (c) (2014 ... Nishant Sareen) and also in (2009) 17 SCC 92 (State of Punjab and Another Vs. ... However, additional time of one month may be allowed where consultation is required with the Attorney General (AG) or any other law
2013 0 Supreme(Del) 1786 • India - Delhi
SURESH KAIT
Nishant Sareen (2010) 14 SCC 527 in which the Supreme Court has observed as under:- ... p align="justify ... obtain Rs. 1 crore, an illegal gratification, from Shri Khalik Chatailwala, proprietor of M/s Oriental Enterprises and Power of Attorney ... After receipt of the First Information Reports, a wireless message was sent by the Superintendent of Police, CBI, ACB, Bombay to
2013 0 Supreme(Bom) 2230 • India - Bombay
S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, G.S.PATEL
... 4) State of Himachal Pradesh v/s Nishant Sareen, reported in ( ... Desai is the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of State of Himachal Pradesh v/s Nishant Sareen, reported in a ... Therefore, the argument of the learned Attorney General that the appellant cannot file a complaint for prosecuting respondent No.2
2013 0 Supreme(Bom) 2225 • India - Bombay
S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, G.S.PATEL
... 4) State of Himachal Pradesh v/s Nishant Sareen, reported in ( ... Desai is the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of State of Himachal Pradesh v/s Nishant Sareen, reported in a ... Therefore, the argument of the learned Attorney General that the appellant cannot file a complaint for prosecuting respondent No.2
2019 0 Supreme(Del) 882 • India - Delhi
REKHA PALLI
Nishant Sareen, (2010) 14 SCC 527, wherein the Supreme Court has held that a competent authority under ... Sareen (supra), without appreciating the fact all the relevant documents had not been placed before the Sanctioning Authority. ... Where consultation is required with the Attorney General or the Solicitor General, additional time of one month could be allowed
2013 0 Supreme(Guj) 658 • India - Gujarat
R.M.CHHAYA
Sareen and Anr., (2008) 8 SCC 1. ... It is further contended that the power of attorney as well as the agreement to sale has been executed. ... further contended that in the so called notice dated 21.10.2009 as well as in the complaint, there is no whisper about power of attorney
Filter by Legal Phrase
