AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Mention of FIR Number in NCB Form - Multiple sources discuss the presence or absence of FIR numbers in NCB forms. Some indicate the FIR number was written in the same pen as other contents, raising questions about the timing and authenticity of the form's preparation (01800021335, 01800020562, 01800016511). Others note that the FIR number was included in the form but emphasize that its presence alone does not imply unfair investigation (01800003602, 01800003513). There are concerns about whether the form was prepared at the spot or later, based on handwriting and timing issues Anil Kumar VS State of Himachal Pradesh - Himachal Pradesh, State of Himachal Pradesh VS Rai Singh - Himachal Pradesh, Dharam Chand VS State of Himachal Pradesh - Himachal Pradesh, ANGOORI DEVI VS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Himachal Pradesh, DINESH KUMAR VS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH - Himachal Pradesh.

  • Preparation and Timing of NCB Forms - Several sources highlight discrepancies in the timing of form preparation. For example, one states the NCB form was prepared a day after the FIR date (01800031148), and another notes the investigation officer took over an hour to fill the form (01800021335). These inconsistencies raise questions about the form's credibility and whether it was prepared contemporaneously with the seizure State Of H. P. VS Raju - Himachal Pradesh, Anil Kumar VS State of Himachal Pradesh - Himachal Pradesh.

  • Procedural Concerns and Formalities - Some references mention procedural lapses, such as the absence of independent witnesses, or the time taken to complete formalities like sealing and dispatch (01800024386, 01800016511). These issues could impact the reliability of the evidence and the investigation process.

  • Content and Accuracy of NCB Forms - There are observations about inaccuracies or modifications in the forms, such as changing the number of samples from Eight to Four (01800003602), or unexplained entries of case details before the FIR was registered (01800020562). These points suggest potential irregularities in documentation.

  • Legal and Evidentiary Implications - The presence of resin in samples was deemed sufficient to classify them as Charas, regardless of the resin percentage (01800019822). Additionally, doubts about whether the forms were prepared on the spot or later influence the evidentiary weight of the documents, impacting the case's fairness State of Himachal Pradesh VS Gian Chand - Himachal Pradesh.

Analysis and Conclusion:
The sources collectively indicate that the mention of the FIR number in NCB forms is a common feature, but its timing and manner of entry raise questions about the authenticity and fairness of the investigation. Discrepancies in preparation timing, handwriting, and procedural lapses suggest that the forms may not always have been prepared contemporaneously with the seizure, which could undermine their evidentiary value. The consistent concern is whether the forms were genuinely prepared at the spot or later fabricated, affecting the integrity of the evidence related to drug seizures.

Search Results for "No Fir no Mentioned over Ncb Form"

State Of H. P.  VS Raju

2011 0 Supreme(HP) 2526 India - Himachal Pradesh

R.B.MISRA, V.K.SHARMA

No. 11 NCB Form' shown to have been in triplicate was prepared, and independent witnesses had put their signatures on it, whereas on analysis of Ex. PW-1/K it appears that at Sr. No. 2 for 'NCB Form' FIR dated 5.12.2000 was mentioned whereas, NCB form was itself prepared on 6.12.2000. ... It is pertinent to mention that PW-2 Yashpal has not mentioned about the sending of NCB form along with sample....

Anil Kumar VS State of Himachal Pradesh

2017 0 Supreme(HP) 765 India - Himachal Pradesh

AJAY MOHAN GOEL

While dealing with the issue of FIR number being mentioned in the NCB form in the same pen in which other contents of the same were written, learned trial Court held that though admittedly the FIR number was written with the same pen within which the NCB form was written, but then it was not obligatory ... It has come in the statement of PW-4 that the Investigating Officer took around one hour and twenty minutes to fill the NCB form....

Subhash Chand VS State Of Himachal Pradesh

2004 0 Supreme(HP) 351 India - Himachal Pradesh

M.R.VERMA

However, NCB form contains the FIR number, date and particulars of penal provisions and there is no explanation as to how these particulars unknown to PW-12 till the NCB from had been deposited in the safe custody came to be mentioned in such from. ... It is admitted case of the prosecution that NCB form was prepared and deposited before PW-12 could know the FIR number. ... In the aforesaid circumstance PW-12 had no occasion to make any addition in t....

Des Raj VS State Of Himachal Pradesh

2020 0 Supreme(HP) 33 India - Himachal Pradesh

VIVEK SINGH THAKUR

Time mentioned in NCB form is not of recovery but of seizure. For completing all these formalities, consumption of half an hour, rather appears to be reasonable and in NCB form (Ex.PW.7/C) time of seizure mentioned as 3.45 p.m. is genuine time. ... of Police, Chamba, at 5.15 p.m., whereas, he had reached Police Station at 5.25 p.m. and that in the FIR (Ex.PW.7/A), time of occurrence has been mentioned from 3.15 p.m. to 5.00 p.m., whereas, in #HL_STAR....

ANGOORI DEVI VS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2005 0 Supreme(HP) 79 India - Himachal Pradesh

M.R.VERMA

So far as mentioning of the FIR number in the NCB form is concerned, no doubt it is mentioned in the form but its mentioning by itself is not indicative of any unfairness in the investigation. ... PN, initially "Eight" samples poppy husk has been mentioned. However, after cutting the word "Eight" it has been substituted by "Four". ... in the NCB form, which render the investigation unfair. ... Each and every document sought to be produced in evidence....

State of Himachal Pradesh VS Gian Chand

2016 0 Supreme(HP) 985 India - Himachal Pradesh

RAJIV SHARMA, VIVEK SINGH THAKUR

recovered from the conscious and exclusive possession of the accused - Full Bench held that the presence of resin in purified or crude form ... The Full Bench held that the presence of resin in purified or crude form is sufficient to hold that the sample was that of Charas ... requirement of the presence of a particular percentage of resin in the sample and that the presence of resin in purified or crude form ... He deposited the case property alongwith above mentioned documents on 6.1.2010 at FSL Junga and handed over r....

State of Himachal Pradesh VS Hottam Ram

2016 0 Supreme(HP) 1616 India - Himachal Pradesh

SANJAY KAROL, AJAY MOHAN GOEL

In the said NCB form, the date and time of the seizure has been mentioned as 4.7.2010 at 6.00 P.M. near village Saran. ... Against column No. 7 of the said form which pertains to date of dispatch by the officer to Police station, the date is mentioned as 04.07.2010 and time of discharge is mentioned as 9.00 P.M. ... NCB form is on record as Ext. PW4/D. A perusal of the same demonstrates that case FIR No. was already written on it in....

State of Himachal Pradesh VS Rai Singh

2016 0 Supreme(HP) 1993 India - Himachal Pradesh

SANJAY KAROL, AJAY MOHAN GOEL

PW1/D and NCB form Ext. PW6/C, one thing which strikes to us is this that in all these documents, FIR number ‘4/11’ finds mentioned in the same hand, same flow and with same pen with which other contents thereof have been filled. ... Coming to the facts of this case, as we have already mentioned above the entire case of the prosecution is shrouded with the suspicion, in view of the fact that the documents which were purportedly prepared by the Investigating Officer at the spot before the registration of....

DINESH KUMAR VS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

2004 0 Supreme(HP) 237 India - Himachal Pradesh

LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA, R.L.KHURANA

the First Information Report was mentioned in memo Ext.PC regarding recovery and taking into possession of Charas alongwith car HP-34-7700, memo Ext.PD regarding recovery of other articles recovered from the possession of the accused and also on NCB form Ext.PB, According to the learned counsel all ... A perusal of the copy of NCB form Ext.PV shows that the column had been filled up by PW-16 who has put his signature thereon. In column 8 the date of drawl and dispatch of the sample is ....

Dharam Chand VS State of Himachal Pradesh

2014 0 Supreme(HP) 962 India - Himachal Pradesh

SANJAY KAROL, P.S.RANA

form, and the absence of independent witnesses. ... various submissions made by the appellants' counsel, including those related to the weight of the samples, the preparation of the NCB ... mentioned. ... reasons hereinafter mentioned. ... Another submission of learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellants that NCB form carried the FIR number which itself suggests that it was not prepared at the spot but was prepared later on is also rejected being devoid of ....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top