AI Overview...
Non Obstante Clause Legal Analysis
-
Definition and Purpose: A non-obstante clause (also called notwithstanding clause) is inserted in statutes to explicitly override other laws or provisions, establishing the precedence of the specific law or section State Of Bihar VS Bihar Rajya M. S. E. S. K. K. Mahasanghs - Supreme Court.
-
Legislative Intent and Construction: Courts interpret non-obstante clauses by examining legislative intent, the context of the clause, and the scope of the overriding effect. The extent to which the clause overrides other laws depends on legislative purpose and language used Pandharinath Sakharam Chavan VS Ramu Krishna Kate deceased through L. R. Bhagwan Ramu Kate & others - Bombay, State Bank of India VS Union of India, Ministry of Finance - Telangana.
-
Effect on Other Provisions:
- Such clauses generally give the law or section in which they appear precedence over conflicting provisions of other laws or statutes, but the scope is not absolute; courts analyze whether the clause was intended to be comprehensive or limited Assam Gramin Vikash Bank VS Union of India - Gauhati, STATE BANK OF INDIA VS S. M. OIL EXTRACTION PVT. LTD. - Calcutta.
-
For example, in the context of the 1976 Act and the Gratuity Act, the non-obstante clause indicates the overriding effect of the latter over other laws, but courts interpret its scope carefully Assam Gramin Vikash Bank VS Union of India - Gauhati.
-
Legal Limitations and Court Interpretation:
- Courts aim to harmonize laws where possible, avoiding conflicts by construing provisions to operate harmoniously GALATEA LTD. VS SHREE KRISHNA EXPORTS - Gujarat.
-
The courts also scrutinize whether the non-obstante clause was meant to be absolute or conditional, often considering the legislative context and purpose Central Warehousing Corporation (A Govt. of India Undertaking) VS Fortpoint Automotive - Bombay, State Bank of India VS Union of India, Ministry of Finance - Telangana.
-
Specific Case Applications:
- In lease and tenancy cases, non-obstante clauses may impact the rights of tenants or heirs, but courts distinguish between legislative assumptions and actual rights, often emphasizing the importance of legislative intent Pandharinath Sakharam Chavan VS Ramu Krishna Kate deceased through L. R. Bhagwan Ramu Kate & others - Bombay.
-
In cases involving financial statutes, such as the Debt Recovery Act and Companies Act, courts have held that non-obstante clauses do not automatically prevail over other laws unless explicitly intended, and interpretative caution is exercised STATE BANK OF INDIA VS S. M. OIL EXTRACTION PVT. LTD. - Calcutta, STATE BANK OF INDIA VS S. M. OIL EXTRACTION PVT. LTD. - Calcutta.
-
Judicial Approach:
- Courts generally favor a purposive approach, interpreting non-obstante clauses to achieve legislative objectives without unnecessarily overriding other laws, unless the language clearly indicates an overriding intent Sea Face Park Co-operative Housing Societies VS State of Maharashtra through Government Pleader, High Court, Mumbai - Bombay, GALATEA LTD. VS SHREE KRISHNA EXPORTS - Gujarat.
Analysis and Conclusion
Non-obstante clauses serve as powerful legislative tools to prioritize specific statutes or provisions over conflicting laws. However, their scope is subject to judicial interpretation, which considers legislative intent, context, and the principle of harmonious construction. Courts tend to restrict the scope of such clauses to what is explicitly intended by the legislature, avoiding an overly broad application that could undermine the coherence of the legal system State Of Bihar VS Bihar Rajya M. S. E. S. K. K. Mahasanghs - Supreme Court, State Bank of India VS Union of India, Ministry of Finance - Telangana.
References: - State Of Bihar VS Bihar Rajya M. S. E. S. K. K. Mahasanghs - Supreme Court - Pandharinath Sakharam Chavan VS Ramu Krishna Kate deceased through L. R. Bhagwan Ramu Kate & others - Bombay - Central Warehousing Corporation (A Govt. of India Undertaking) VS Fortpoint Automotive - Bombay - STATE BANK OF INDIA VS S. M. OIL EXTRACTION PVT. LTD. - Calcutta - STATE BANK OF INDIA VS S. M. OIL EXTRACTION PVT. LTD. - Calcutta - GALATEA LTD. VS SHREE KRISHNA EXPORTS - Gujarat - Assam Gramin Vikash Bank VS Union of India - Gauhati - State Bank of India VS Union of India, Ministry of Finance - Telangana
Search Results for "Non Obstante Clause Legal Analysis"
1979 0 Supreme(Bom) 38 • India - Bombay
N.B.NAIK, V.S.DESHPANDE
OF SECTION 32(1-B) - NON OBSTANTE CLAUSE - EFFECT ON SECTION 29 - LEGISLATIVE ASSUMPTION OF CONTINUED TENANCY - DISTINCTION BETWEEN ... RIGHTS OF HEIRS UNDER SECTION 40 - APPLICABILITY OF SECTION 29 - EFFECT OF INACTION OF TENANT - EXTINGUISHMENT OF TENANCY RIGHTS - ANALYSIS ... APPLICABILITY OF SECTION 40 - SUBSISTING TENANCY - LIMITATION - RESTORATION OF POSSESSION - LEGISLATIVE INTENT - CONSTRUCTION OF STATUTE - LEGAL ... The legislative fiction of the continued subsistence of tenancy adverted to ear....
2019 0 Supreme(Gau) 872 • India - Gauhati
UJJAL BHUYAN
As already discussed in the case of the non-obstante clause operating in Section 32 of the 1976 Act, in the context of the Gratuity Act, such a provision starting with a non-obstante clause can only mean overriding effect of the Gratuity Act over any other enactment or instrument or contract in the specific ... The use of the expression notwithstanding would imply that by virtue of the non-obstante clause, provisions of the 1976 Act....
1975 0 Supreme(Del) 117 • India - Delhi
H.L.ANAND, S.N.SHANKAR
Whether the principle embodied in clause (a) of Section III of the Transfer of Property Act was attracted. 3. ... Whether the lease could be said to have been determined by forfeiture in terms of the principle embodied in clause (g) of Section ... The lease could be said to have been determined by forfeiture in terms of the principle embodied in clause (g) of Section III of ... clause, held that the non-obstante clause did not absolve the landlord from his obligation ....
2009 0 Supreme(Bom) 1742 • India - Bombay
R.P.SONDURBALDOTA, SWATANTER KUMAR, A.M.KHANWILKAR
obstante clause contained in Section 41(1) of the Act. ... Therefore, hold that inspite of Arbitration Agreement between the parties and non obstante clause in Section 5 of the Act of 1996 ... For, Section 5 of the Act of 1996 in that sense is not an absolute non abstante clause. ... Section 24 opens with a non-obstante clause. ... Besides, the non-obstante #HL_....
2004 8 Supreme 732 • India - Supreme Court
Y.K.SABHARWAL, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
the enactment or the provision in which the non-obstante clause occurs. ... other law in the way of the operation of the principle enacting provision to which the non-obstante clause is attached. ... ... Held : A non-obstante clause is generally appended to a section ... non-obstante clause occurs. ... Proviso to clause 14 of Section 4(I) contains a n....
1999 0 Supreme(Cal) 147 • India - Calcutta
RONOJIT KUMAR MITRA
Issues: Whether the non obstante clause in the Debt Recovery Act would prevail over the non obstante clause in the Companies ... clause in the Debt Recovery Act would prevail over the non obstante clause in the Companies Act. ... obstante clause in the Companies Act would operate in its full force, and the suit would be heard by the company court. ... According to him, the Legis....
2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 500 • India - Bombay
S.C.GUPTE
The court highlighted the non-obstante clause in Section 92, the residuary clause in sub-section (2) of Section 92, and the specific ... emphasized the interpretation of these provisions in determining the period of limitation for the dispute and upheld the lower courts' analysis ... provisions in clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 92. ... It begins with a non-obstante clause. ... I am afraid that is not a correct read....
1999 0 Supreme(Cal) 144 • India - Calcutta
RONOJIT KUMAR MITRA
The petitioner argued that the Debt Recovery Act was a later enactment and its non obstante clause prevailed over the non obstante ... COMPANY LAW - WINDING UP - NON OBSTANTE CLAUSE - CONFLICT BETWEEN COMPANIES ACT AND DEBT RECOVERY ACT - TRANSFER OF SUIT TO DEBT ... obstante clause in the Companies Act would operate in its full force. ... According to him, the Legislature at the time of making the new enactment, w....
2021 0 Supreme(Guj) 966 • India - Gujarat
J.B.PARDIWALA, VAIBHAVI D.NANAVATI
It is duty of court to avoid any conflict and construe provisions to that they are harmonious - The non-obstante clause only provides ... arbitration agreement in case on hand could be said to be null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed - Whether non-obstante ... date, only plaintiffs (holding a total of 33 machines) have termed dispute as a fraud - It is a settled position of law that a non-obstante ... In the instant case the non ....
2020 0 Supreme(Telangana) 186 • India - Telangana
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, T.AMARNATH GOUD
sanctioned limits of Rs.820 Crores to 6th respondent with working capital limits of Rs.198 crores (Fund based) and Rs.622 Crores (Non ... Securities) Act, 1992 with the provisions of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - In view of this settled legal ... While interpreting non obstante clause, the court is required to find out the extent to which the legislature intended to do so and the context in which the non obstante clause#HL_EN....
Filter by Legal Phrase
