AI Overview...
- Order 7 Rule 14(3) CPC - Rejection of Application to Take Documents on Record
-
Main points: Multiple cases involve applications under Order 7 Rule 14(3) CPC for the production or inclusion of documents during civil proceedings. Courts often reject such applications if they lack relevance, specificity, or proper pleading. Rejections are based on the absence of showing the relevance of documents or non-compliance with procedural requirements Banarsi Lal (Since Deceased) through LRs. Gopal Agarwal VS Civil Judge (Jr. Division) West, Jaipur Metropolitan City, Jaipur Anr. - Rajasthan, Anil Kumar Chashta VS Geeta Devi - Rajasthan, Kala Devi W/o Late Sh. Navneet Gurjar VS Praveen Surana S/o Sh. Sugan Singh Surana - Rajasthan, Bhawani Lal S/o. Darshuram Alias Darashram Rathore vs Ramesh Kumar S/o. Late Itwari Ram Rathore - Chhattisgarh, Narayan Lal VS Mangi Lal - Rajasthan, Abdul Hammed VS Municipal Board - Rajasthan, Baksha Ram VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Ghasnin Bai Wd/o Janki Das vs Kuteli Bai D/o Sindadhudas - Chhattisgarh, HALDIRAM (INDIA) PVT. LTD. VS HALDIRAM BHUJIAWALA - Delhi.
-
Common Insights:
- Courts emphasize the necessity for applications under Order 7 Rule 14(3) CPC to specify the relevance of the documents and adhere to procedural norms.
- Rejections often occur when applications are vague or fail to demonstrate how the documents are pertinent to the case.
-
Some cases highlight that even after rejection, courts can reconsider and allow the documents if proper grounds are established Baksha Ram VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan.
-
Analysis and Conclusion:
- The rejection of applications under Order 7 Rule 14(3) CPC generally hinges on procedural non-compliance or lack of demonstrated relevance.
- Courts retain discretion to allow such documents if the applicant clarifies relevance and follows due process.
- Proper framing of the application, with clear relevance and adherence to procedural requirements, is crucial to prevent rejection.
- Overall, Order 7 Rule 14(3) serves as a procedural safeguard, ensuring only relevant documents are admitted, but courts may revisit rejected applications if justified Banarsi Lal (Since Deceased) through LRs. Gopal Agarwal VS Civil Judge (Jr. Division) West, Jaipur Metropolitan City, Jaipur Anr. - Rajasthan, Anil Kumar Chashta VS Geeta Devi - Rajasthan, Kala Devi W/o Late Sh. Navneet Gurjar VS Praveen Surana S/o Sh. Sugan Singh Surana - Rajasthan, Baksha Ram VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan.
References: - Banarsi Lal (Since Deceased) through LRs. Gopal Agarwal VS Civil Judge (Jr. Division) West, Jaipur Metropolitan City, Jaipur Anr. - Rajasthan - Anil Kumar Chashta VS Geeta Devi - Rajasthan - Kala Devi W/o Late Sh. Navneet Gurjar VS Praveen Surana S/o Sh. Sugan Singh Surana - Rajasthan - Bhawani Lal S/o. Darshuram Alias Darashram Rathore vs Ramesh Kumar S/o. Late Itwari Ram Rathore - Chhattisgarh - Narayan Lal VS Mangi Lal - Rajasthan - Abdul Hammed VS Municipal Board - Rajasthan - Baksha Ram VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan - Ghasnin Bai Wd/o Janki Das vs Kuteli Bai D/o Sindadhudas - Chhattisgarh - HALDIRAM (INDIA) PVT. LTD. VS HALDIRAM BHUJIAWALA - Delhi
Search Results for "Order 7 Rule 14 3 Cpc Rejected"
2014 0 Supreme(Raj) 1627 • India - Rajasthan
R.S.CHAUHAN
the order rejecting their application to take a document on record under Order 7, Rule 14(3) CPC and the subsequent dismissal of ... CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE - ORDER 7 RULE 14(3) - TAKING DOCUMENT ON RECORD - SUMMARY Fact of the Case: Petitioners challenged ... Division) West, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur, whereby the learned Magistrate had rejected#HL_END....
2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1525 • India - Rajasthan
ABHAY CHATURVEDI
The trial Court rejected the application for taking certain documents on record under Order 7 Rule 14 (3) CPC. ... Issues: Admissibility of documents in a partition suit under Order 7 Rule 14 (3) CPC. ... Order 7 Rule 14 (3) CPC - Partition Suit - Admissi....
2017 0 Supreme(Raj) 745 • India - Rajasthan
PANKAJ BHANDARI
Civil Procedure Code,1908 - Order 6 and 7, Rule 14 and 17 (3) – Controversy - Pendency of suit - Claimed ... injunction - Petitioner has preferred this writ petition aggrieved by order It is contended by counsel for petitioner that during ... laid down by various High Courts and this court - Held, Coordinate Bench of this Court in was dealing with amended provision of CPC ... Nathdwara vide which applications filed by the petitioner under ....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 10400 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J
(A) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order 7 Rule 14(3) - Production of documents - Plaintiff moved an application under Order 7 Rule ... 14(3) of CPC to submit a certified copy of Settlement No. - 246 pertaining to year 1939-40. ... The Trial Court rejected the application holding lack of pleading regarding its relevance. ... whereby application under ....
2013 0 Supreme(Raj) 1424 • India - Rajasthan
VINEET KOTHARI
7 Rule 14 (3) CPC. ... CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE - ORDER 7 RULE 14 (3) - PRODUCTION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE - REJECTION OF APPLICATION - INTERFERENCE UNDER ... Fact of the Case: Plaintiff filed an application under Order 7 Rule 14 (3) CPC to produce a 'Patta' of a neighbor, ... 7#HL_EN....
2022 0 Supreme(HP) 856 • India - Himachal Pradesh
SATYEN VAIDYA
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order 7 Rule 14 (3), Rule 17-A of Order 18 - Electricity Act, 2003 - Restrain ... plaintiffs that documents were not available with them - Prayer so made by plaintiffs before learned trial Court has rightly been rejected ... 17-A of Order 18 of CPC, from statute book through an amendment, which came into effect in year 2002 - Even otherwise, plaintiffs ... By way o....
2012 0 Supreme(Raj) 2070 • India - Rajasthan
GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 14(3) and ... record certain documents without showing any relevancy of the same – it was held by the trial court that such application is in order ... final adjudication of the matter and dismissed the same – on this appeal the court held that by the power of writ jurisdiction the order ... was filed under Order 7 Rule 14 (3#HL....
2014 0 Supreme(Raj) 1129 • India - Rajasthan
SANGEET LODHA
7, Rule 14 (3) of CPC. ... the trial court to consider and decide the application under Order 7, Rule 14 (3) of CPC on its merits. ... Order 7, Rule 14 (3) - Civil Procedure Code - The court allowed the petition, setting aside the order of rejection and directing ... of #HL....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 7438 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Rakesh Mohan Pandey, J
7 Rule 14 of CPC, rejecting applications lacking specificity. ... (A) Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Order 7 Rule 14 - Application for additional documents - Petitioners seeking to declare sale deed ... (Paras 6, 8, 7) ... ... (B) Application under Order 7 Rule 14 - The court emphasized ... He would pray to set aside the order....
2009 0 Supreme(Del) 377 • India - Delhi
MANMOHAN
CPC - Filing of Documents - Order 7 Rule 14 - Order 13 Rule 1 - Order 7 Rule 18 - Order 7 Rule 14 sub-rule 3 - Indian Evidence ... 7 Rule 14 of CPC to bring on record additional documents. ... The trial Court rejected th....
Filter by Legal Phrase
