Purpose of Ossification Test - Primarily used to estimate the age of a victim or accused based on skeletal maturity, especially in cases involving minors or age disputes Manik Bhakti VS State of Tripura - Tripura, Sagir Ahmad VS State Of Bihar - Patna, Shayama alias Dadi VS State of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana, Tapas Mahata VS State Of West Bengal - Calcutta, Madan Lal VS State of Punjab - Crimes.
Procedure and Involvement - The test involves radiological examination of bones (commonly hand and wrist) performed by radiologists or medical officers, with results sent to forensic laboratories for analysis. The test's timing and accuracy depend on the expertise of medical professionals and the quality of radiographs Manik Bhakti VS State of Tripura - Tripura, RAMCHIT RAJBHAR VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Calcutta, Tapas Mahata VS State Of West Bengal - Calcutta.
Legal Significance - Courts often rely on ossification test results alongside other evidence such as school records, medical examinations, and witness statements to determine age. The test can be decisive in cases involving minors, sexual offenses, or age-related legal issues Sagir Ahmad VS State Of Bihar - Patna, Shayama alias Dadi VS State of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana, Tapas Mahata VS State Of West Bengal - Calcutta, Madan Lal VS State of Punjab - Crimes.
Limitations and Controversies - The accuracy of ossification tests can vary (±2 years), and other evidence is usually considered to corroborate findings. In some cases, the absence of ossification testing or conflicting reports has led courts to order further medical assessments or reject the test's findings Manik Bhakti VS State of Tripura - Tripura, RAMCHIT RAJBHAR VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Calcutta, Arwind Pal S/o Shri Kumar Pal VS State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer - Chhattisgarh.
Case Examples:
Ossification testing is a crucial forensic tool for age estimation in legal cases, especially where age determination impacts the outcome of criminal proceedings. While valuable, it is not infallible and must be supplemented with other evidence for accurate assessment. Courts recognize its importance but also consider its limitations, emphasizing the need for comprehensive evaluation Sagir Ahmad VS State Of Bihar - Patna, Shayama alias Dadi VS State of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana.
References: - Manik Bhakti VS State of Tripura - Tripura - Sagir Ahmad VS State Of Bihar - Patna - Kabul Hossain @ Kabul Hossen @ Kabul Islam VS State of West Bengal - Calcutta - Shayama alias Dadi VS State of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana - RAMCHIT RAJBHAR VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Calcutta - Tapas Mahata VS State Of West Bengal - Calcutta - Arwind Pal S/o Shri Kumar Pal VS State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer - Chhattisgarh - Santosh Markam VS State of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh - Ramjan @ Shokat VS State of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana - Madan Lal VS State of Punjab - Crimes
for ossification test to determine the age of the victim, examined and recorded the statements of the available witnesses. ... During investigation, police seized the wearing apparels of the victim, arranged to record the statement of the victim under Section 164(5) of CrPC, arranged for medical examination of the victim as well as the accused, sample of vaginal swab was sent to the State Forensic Science Laboratory, arranged ... He collected the reports of medical examination and ossification #HL_START....
Ratio Decidendi: The determination of the petitioner's age by the Verification Committee without an Ossification Test was ... court held that the determination of the petitioner's age by the Verification Committee was illegal as it was not based on the Ossification ... Test, and directed the case to be referred to a Medical Board for a proper determination of the petitioner's age. ... Accordingly this court directs the authority to refer the case of the petitioner to the Medical Board consisting of experts of ....
P.W. 13 held ossification test of the victim. P.W.15 is an official of the Forensic Science Laboratory. P.W.18 is a Doctor attached to the Rajgang Rural Hospital. P.W.12 recorded the statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C.. Rest of them are all official witnesses. ... Sinha referred the victim to Sadar Hospital without performing any test. P.W.9 examined the victim on 21st June, 2004, that is to say on the 52nd day from the date of incident. He opined that there may have been sexual intercourse.
The sealed parcels were sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory, Madhuban (for short, “FSL”). The ossification test of the prosecutrix was conducted by Radiologist, Dr. Lajja Ram (PW9), according to which the age of the prosecutrix was 17 years, plus minus 2 years. ... The ossification test may be one of the aspects with regard to the age of the prosecutrix but other evidence clearly shows, especially the school records, that the age of the prosecutrix was merely 16 to 17 years. ... 15....
On 16-8-79 she was again sent to Howrah General Hospital for her Ossification Test. The frock and pant seized from the wearing of Rekha Devi were sent to Forensic Science Laboratory. On 8-8-79 the accused was forwarded to Howrah General Hospital for examination. ... W. 5 who merely held ossification test 9 days after occurrence and had nothing to do with the history of the case. ... ... ( 15 ) THE blood stained frock and pant of the prosecutrix were sent for analysis to the ....
Ratio Decidendi: The court determined the age of the victim girl based on evidence from the school register, ossification ... test, and statements of the victim and her parents. ... Dipankar Sarkar was a Medical Officer attached to the Forensic Science Medicine at Bankura Sammilani Medical College and Hospital. He holds ossification test of the victim girl on 10th May, 2012 and submitted charge on 19th May, 2012. ... Ossification test of the victim ....
Despite opinion of the doctor, ossification test of prosecutrix has not been conducted. Dr. ... Pushpa Janbandhu (PW-17) advised to conduct ossification test to verify the age of prosecutrix, but Inspector Rajkumar Sori (PW-9) has not stated anything about ossification test, upon which, no explanation has come from the side of prosecution. At the time of medical examination, Dr. ... Insofar as the FSL report of State Forensic Science Laboratory (Ex.P....
Science Laboratory. ... Science Laboratory. ... Science Laboratory. ... The Test Identification Parade (TIP) was conducted in Central Jail Narsinghpur. The appellant was identified by the victim. The recovered materials relating to victim and appellant were sent for medical examination to Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) Sagar. ... For this purpose, the Ossification Test report of Radiologist and Medical Officer- Dr. Akhilesh Gupta (PW-9) was consid....
DNA samples of the prosecutrix, deceased child and the accused were sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory for being tested. 4. ... Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that since the age of the prosecutrix, as per the ossification test, had been opined to be between 14-16 years, it could not be digested that a girl as young as her would have delivered a child and that too without any medical assistance. ... The authenticity of the material and evidence produced by the prosecution leading to the framing of the c....
- Prosecutrix left her house accompanied appellant & lived with him for 5/6 days - Appellant had sexual intercourse with her - Ossification ... test disclosed age of prosecutrix between 15-1/2 to 16-1/2 years- Taking or enticing away a minor out of lawful guardianship was ... Her ossification test was conducted to ascertain her age which was found to be between 15-1/2 to 16-1/2 years. Her clothes were taken into possession and were sent to the office of the Forensic Science Laboratory.....
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.