AI Overview...
-
Permanent Disconnection Process - The process generally involves submitting a formal request, paying applicable fees (e.g., Rs. 200/- as per UTTARAKHAND POWER CORPORATION LTD. VS YUSUF - Uttarakhand), and following departmental procedures. Disconnection may be initiated voluntarily by the consumer or enforced by the electricity department, often after dues are unpaid (UTTARAKHAND POWER CORPORATION LTD. VS YUSUF - Uttarakhand, BASANTI DEVI VS U. P. STATE ELECTRICITY DIVISION - Consumer, KALICHARAN DAS VS M. P. MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LIMITED - Consumer, 01200014249).
-
Legal and Regulatory Framework - Disconnection must adhere to rules under the Electricity Act, 2003, and the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Courts have emphasized proper procedures and timely communication before permanent disconnection (BASANTI DEVI VS U. P. STATE ELECTRICITY DIVISION - Consumer, SDO (OP) UHBVNL, KURUKSHETRA VS DES RAJ - Consumer, Lacchman VS Executive Engineer, Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited - Consumer).
-
Disputes and Consumer Rights - Disputes often arise over billing, whether disconnection was authorized, or if formal disconnection procedures were followed. Consumers have challenged disconnections on grounds of deficiency in service, improper procedures, or unresolved dues (UPCL VS Saran Singh - Uttarakhand, U. P. S. E. B. VS AYUB HUSSAIN - Consumer, KALICHARAN DAS VS M. P. MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LIMITED - Consumer, Lacchman VS Executive Engineer, Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited - Consumer).
-
Unauthorized or Improper Disconnection - Cases exist where disconnection was made without proper permission or despite ongoing requests for reconnection, leading to consumer complaints and courts ruling in favor of consumers if procedures were not followed (KALICHARAN DAS VS M. P. MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LIMITED - Consumer, Sayeed VS Executive Engineer, UPCL - Uttarakhand).
-
Restoration and Compensation - Courts sometimes order restoration of electricity or compensation if disconnection was improper or caused hardship, especially when formal procedures were not adhered to (BASANTI DEVI VS U. P. STATE ELECTRICITY DIVISION - Consumer, UTTARAKHAND POWER CORPORATION LTD. VS YUSUF - Uttarakhand).
-
Special Cases - Disputes involving disconnection of industrial or tubewell connections, or where the connection was used after the consumer's demise, highlight complexities in disconnection procedures and consumer rights (BASANTI DEVI VS U. P. STATE ELECTRICITY DIVISION - Consumer, Sayeed VS Executive Engineer, UPCL - Uttarakhand, UTTARAKHAND POWER CORPORATION LTD. VS YUSUF - Uttarakhand).
Analysis and Conclusion
Permanent disconnection of electricity must follow prescribed legal and departmental procedures, including proper notice, payment of dues, and adherence to regulations. Unauthorized disconnection or failure to follow due process can lead to consumer complaints and legal remedies. Courts have consistently emphasized consumer rights, proper procedural conduct, and the importance of clear communication in disconnection cases (BASANTI DEVI VS U. P. STATE ELECTRICITY DIVISION - Consumer, KALICHARAN DAS VS M. P. MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LIMITED - Consumer, SDO (OP) UHBVNL, KURUKSHETRA VS DES RAJ - Consumer). Consumers are entitled to seek restoration or compensation if disconnection is unjustified or improperly executed.
References: - UTTARAKHAND POWER CORPORATION LTD. VS YUSUF - Uttarakhand - BASANTI DEVI VS U. P. STATE ELECTRICITY DIVISION - Consumer - KALICHARAN DAS VS M. P. MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN COMPANY LIMITED - Consumer - UPCL VS Saran Singh - Uttarakhand - U. P. S. E. B. VS AYUB HUSSAIN - Consumer - SDO (OP) UHBVNL, KURUKSHETRA VS DES RAJ - Consumer - RAMAN ISPAT (PVT. ) LTD. VS PASHCHIMANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD. - Allahabad - Sayeed VS Executive Engineer, UPCL - Uttarakhand - Kamal Kumar Jain vs Manan Apparels Limited - National Company Law Tribunal - Lacchman VS Executive Engineer, Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited - Consumer
Search Results for "Permanent Disconnection of Electricity Connection"
2015 0 Supreme(UK) 59 • India - Uttarakhand
D.K.TYAGI, VEENA SHARMA
Department for permanent disconnection of the electricity connection and deposited a fee of Rs. 200/- for disconnection according ... — Thereby he filed a consumer complaint — Held that before 07.03.1998, i.e., the date of deposition of fee for permanent disconnection ... to the rules of Electricity Department — Despite depositing noted fee and outstanding dues opposite party sent many bills to him ... Later on the said tubewell/boring failed and the....
• India - Consumer
K.D.SHAHI, SURENDRA KUMAR, LUXMI SINGH
Electricity Department - Consumer complaint for permanent disconnection of industrial connection - Electricity Act, 2003, Section ... Fact of the Case: The complainant, a consumer of an industrial connection, requested for permanent disconnection and ... The court allowed the appeal, directing the permanent disconnection of the connection and awarded compensation and cost of litigation ... It wa....
• India - Consumer
S.D.AGARWAL, MONIKA MALIK
permanent disconnection of the electricity connection without permission and non-restoration despite requests. ... Consumer Protection Act - Electricity Connection - Section 13(2) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - The court discussed the ... After his demise, the petitioner used the electricity connection and filed a complaint alleging deficiency in service due to the ... It is stated that the complainant/petitioner had filed a complaint allegin....
2004 0 Supreme(UK) 74 • India - Uttarakhand
K.D.SHAHI, SURENDRA KUMAR, LUXMI SINGH
Issues: Dispute over the nature of electricity connection, billing, and permanent disconnection process. ... electricity connection was taken for domestic purposes but the appellant treated it as commercial, leading to a dispute over billing ... Mere disconnection of the electricity supply would not amount to termination of the contract. ... It was alleged by the complainant and also decided by the Learned Forum that there has been permane....
• India - Consumer
K.D.SHAHI, LUXMI SINGH
Issues: Dispute over the electricity bills claimed by the Electricity Department after the permanent disconnection of the ... Fact of the Case: The complainant's electricity connection was temporarily disconnected in August 1994 and permanently ... complainant's connection. ... The complainant had a connection of electricity. The appellant temporarily disconnected it in August, 1994. However, there was permanent....
• India - Consumer
K.C.GUPTA, S.P.KAPOOR, DEVINDERJIT DHATT
Issues: Dispute over electricity bill assessment and permanent disconnection of electric connection. ... Deficiency in Service - Electricity Supply - The court held that the electricity supplier failed to follow proper procedure in ... Fact of the Case: The respondent, a consumer of electricity, disputed a bill issued by the appellant, alleging that ... It is an admitted fact that respondent (complainant) is consumer of appellant having electric connectio....
2009 0 Supreme(All) 3074 • India - Allahabad
RAN VIJAI SINGH, SUNIL AMBWANI
Electricity Supply Code, 2005—Clauses 4.3 (f)(i) and 4.43(b)(i)—Demand of electricity dues of earlier partnership concern—From subsequent ... concern and recovery proceedings—Permissibility of—Facts show that earlier partnership concern committed defaults in payment of electricity ... subsequent firm—On lifting veil it become clear that purchase of land and change in names of firms was done for knocking down dues of electricity ... The firm did not pay the electricity dues and applied for perm....
2004 0 Supreme(UK) 20 • India - Uttarakhand
K.D.SHAHI, SURENDRA KUMAR, LUXMI SINGH
Fact of the Case: The complainant's father had an electricity connection for a tubewell, which he applied for permanent ... disconnection before his death. ... Electricity Connection Dispute - Consumer Rights - Regulations 1984, M/s. Narain Engineering Vs. ... But still the permanent disconnection was not done. ... It further alleged that during the said period, the connection was regularly used. He never completed the formalities....
2025 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 2950 • India - National Company Law Tribunal
SH. PRABHAT KUMAR, JUSTICE, VIRENDRASINGH BISHT, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
connections surrendered - Respondent’s claims for electricity bills during pre-CIRP period were recognized and ordered for appropriation ... NCLT Rules - Section 60(5) - The applicant sought a refund of a security deposit of Rs. 3,30,500/- based on premises vacated and electricity ... No. 3 is concerned, the Respondent informed the Resolution Professional that the Resolution Professional may make an application for permanent disconnection of the electricity connection....
• India - Consumer
J.M.Malik, S.M.Kantikar
Consumer Protection Act, 1986—Sections 15, 17, 19 and 21—Electricity—Permanent disconnection—Waiver Scheme—Denial of benefits of ... of electricity in December 2005—Electricity meter of Complainant was neither removed nor PDCO was affected—Complainant did not produce ... not cleared his bills—Complaint dismissed by Fora below—There is no documentary evidence to prove that Complainant applied for disconnection ... He has cleared the electricity bills, till December, 20....
Filter by Legal Phrase
