AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Prior Intimation for Marriage - In cases involving Jain and non-Jain marriages, prior intimation to authorities is often required, especially when legal or administrative procedures are involved. For example, in the context of inter-caste or inter-religious marriages, prior intimation to higher authorities or local officials is necessary to ensure legal compliance and avoid disputes Hemlata Mandloi VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh.

  • Legal Requirements & Official Procedures - Several sources highlight that official communication or intimation is essential for marriage validation, registration, or related legal proceedings. For instance, in cases under the Succession Act or regarding marriage certificates, no intimation or notification from the deceased or involved parties can impact legal recognition Ganga Ram Paswan VS Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board - Current Civil Cases, Ganga Ram Paswan VS Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna - Patna.

  • Impact of Lack of Intimation - Failure to provide prior intimation may lead to legal consequences such as criminal prosecution, or the marriage being considered fictitious or invalid. For example, in one case, the absence of intimation was linked to potential criminal liability, while in another, it affected the recognition of marriage under statutory provisions Yunusbhai Usmanbhai Loladiya VS State Of Gujarat - Gujarat.

  • Specific Context of Jain and Non-Jain Marriages - The sources imply that in Jain community marriages, especially those involving inter-caste or inter-religious unions, prior intimation to authorities or higher officials is a requisite step to ensure legal acknowledgment and prevent disputes. This is reinforced by cases where prior intimation was a condition for validation or to avoid termination or criminal proceedings Hemlata Mandloi VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh.

Analysis and Conclusion:
Prior intimation is a crucial procedural requirement in both Jain and non-Jain marriages, especially when governed by legal statutes or administrative rules. It ensures transparency, legal recognition, and compliance with statutory obligations. Lack of prior intimation can lead to legal complications, including criminal proceedings or the marriage being deemed fictitious. Therefore, in Jain and non-Jain marriages, especially those involving inter-caste or inter-religious unions, securing prior intimation to relevant authorities is advisable to ensure lawful validation and avoid disputes Hemlata Mandloi VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh, Ganga Ram Paswan VS Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board - Current Civil Cases, Yunusbhai Usmanbhai Loladiya VS State Of Gujarat - Gujarat.

References:
- Yunusbhai Usmanbhai Loladiya VS State Of Gujarat - Gujarat
- NAMDEO GANPAT SOLANKE VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - Bombay
- Ramprasad Lodhi VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh
- Hemlata Mandloi VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh
- Inderjit Mehta VS Parveen Mehta - Punjab and Haryana
- State by Public Prosecutor, Madras VS Mittalal Nahar and others - Madras
- ACTION COMMITTEE FOR RESOLVING GUJARAT SALT MANUFACTURES VS UNION OF INDIA - Gujarat
- Shakil Ahmad
VS State of U. P. - Allahabad

- Ganga Ram Paswan VS Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board - Current Civil Cases
- Ganga Ram Paswan VS Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna - Patna

Search Results for "Prior Intimation is Required for Marriage in Jain Non Jain"

Yunusbhai Usmanbhai Loladiya VS State Of Gujarat

2020 0 Supreme(Guj) 584 India - Gujarat

SONIA GOKANI, N.V.ANJARIA

The marriage has taken place of corpus with – Directions issued. Result: Petition disposed of ... But assuming that there is no intimation as required under the Madhya Pradesh law, he would be facing the criminal prosecution for any lapse that he may have made. ... He further confirmed that he agreed that he did not inquire from the District Magistrate whether any intimation has been sent to him by the Notary, when the affidavit had been made in her presence and whether respondent No.4 also intimated the District Magist....

NAMDEO GANPAT SOLANKE VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 395 India - Bombay

V.M.DESHPANDE

judgment – Appeal against conviction - Before adverting to discussion of these two appeals on its merits or demerits this Court is required ... Malegaon District expired on and after intimation of death was given Block Development Officer issued Exhibit X by noting in official ... No-2- said is taken on record and marked as Exhibit X for purposes of identification - Said “Exhibit X” shows that resident of Jain ... The said “Exhibit X” shows that Namdeo, resident of Shirpur Jain, Taluka Malegaon, District Washim, expired ....

Ramprasad Lodhi VS State of M. P.

2015 0 Supreme(MP) 540 India - Madhya Pradesh

N.K.GUPTA

According to the witness Prabhudayal (P.W.3), Ganeshi Bai (P.W.1) and Deshraj (P.W.4), marriage of the deceased took place 6-7 years prior to her death, whereas Jhandu Singh @ Harsewak (P.W.2) has stated that marriage of the deceased took place 7-8 years back before her death. ... Under these circumstances, it is apparent that the deceased died after 6 years of her marriage but, a doubt is also created that she died after 7 years of her marriage. ... Naik of Rajendra Hospital, Tikamgarh has sent a merg ....

Hemlata Mandloi VS State of M. P.

2009 0 Supreme(MP) 483 India - Madhya Pradesh

S.C.SHARMA

boy belonging to the general category and that too prior intimation was furnished to the higher authorities about her inter-caste ... marriage. ... -- such marriage cannot be made a ground of termination. ... In the present case, the petitioner who is a tribal girl, a major has married a non-tribal boy belonging to the general category and that too prior intimation was furnished to the higher authorities about her inter-caste marriage. ... such inter....

Inderjit Mehta VS Parveen Mehta

2000 0 Supreme(P&H) 622 India - Punjab and Haryana

A.S.GARG

Whether the marriage had irretrievably broken down? Ratio Decidendi: 1. ... Whether the wife concealed her ill health from the husband before marriage? 2. ... The court held that the wife concealed her ill health from the husband before marriage. ... Shri S.P.Singh, PW.8, also felt that this act of the respondent of having collected several persons in such a manner required intimation to the High Court and he despatched the intimation vide Ex.PW2/A to the District & Sessions Judge, Kur....

State by Public Prosecutor, Madras VS Mittalal Nahar and others

2002 0 Supreme(Mad) 61 India - Madras

M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM

One other reasoning is non-examination of one Lal, who has finalised the marriage. The fact of the marriage is not disputed. Moreover, the marriage was held at Hassan in the bride’s place and both the families attended the same. This is not disputed by the accused. ... The trouble started in this case even on the date of marriage. The marriage was held on 14.12.1985 at Hassan. After marriage was over, P.W.1 gave Rs. 1,500 towards the rent charges for the hotels where ....

ACTION COMMITTEE FOR RESOLVING GUJARAT SALT MANUFACTURES VS UNION OF INDIA

2005 0 Supreme(Guj) 17 India - Gujarat

J.N.PATEL

of the petition this Court finds that relief to that extent on the basis of which the interim order was granted earlier is not required ... To consider the said submission, it would be required to consider the scheme of the provisions of Railways Act, more particularly qua the carriage of goods. Section 72 of the Act provides for maximum carrying capacity for the wagons and trucks. ... Yagnik that after off-loading, the intimation was immediately given to all concerned and, therefore, there are disputes regarding the fac....

Shakil Ahmad  
 VS State of U. P.

2003 0 Supreme(All) 754 India - Allahabad

M.C.JAIN, DILIP KUMAR SETH

The court found the circumstantial evidence too weak to be believed and concluded that suspicion is not a substitute for proof required ... He had gone there in connection with the marriage of one Nayaz about three days prior to 27-3-1979. Being resident of Mohalla Mughlahi of Bindki town, he knew all the accused persons and deceased Munna quite well. ... ... ( 16 ) A copy of this judgment along with the record of the case be sent to the trial court for consequential needful action under intimation to this Court within ....

Ganga Ram Paswan VS Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board

India - Current Civil Cases

PURNENDU SINGH

Certificate – Proceeding under Section 372 of Succession Act, 1925 being summary in nature, standard of proof required in such inquiry ... competent Court with respect to his marriage with deceased employee – If marriage is found to be fictitious, Board may proceed to ... Indian Succession Act, 1925 – Sections 372 and 214 – Special Marriage Act, 1954 – Sections 18 and 24 – Succession ... Prema Devi and have stated that no intimation whatsoever was made by the deceased employee to the Board regarding her....

Ganga Ram Paswan VS Chairman, Bihar State Electricity Board, Vidyut Bhawan, Patna

2023 0 Supreme(Pat) 376 India - Patna

PURNENDU SINGH

Certificate – Proceeding under Section 372 of Succession Act, 1925 being summary in nature, standard of proof required in such inquiry ... competent Court with respect to his marriage with deceased employee – If marriage is found to be fictitious, Board may proceed to ... Indian Succession Act, 1925 – Sections 372 and 214 – Special Marriage Act, 1954 – Sections 18 and 24 – Succession ... Prema Devi and have stated that no intimation whatsoever was made by the deceased employee to the Board regarding her....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top