AI Overview...
-
Property Purchased in Wife's Name Using Husband's Funds - Courts recognize that property bought in a wife's name with her husband's money often indicates a beneficial ownership or a gift, unless proven otherwise. The main criterion for benami transactions is the source of the purchase money, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, such purchases are presumed to be for the benefit of the wife or family Pardeep Kumar Bhasin (since Deceased) Through Lrs VS Seema Bhasin - Punjab and Haryana, Parbati Gangaram Aggarwal VS Firm Jai Ram Dass Bhagat Ram - Punjab and Haryana, Sandeep Sethi, S/o. Shri Ashok Sethi VS Nidhi Kuthiala, W/o. Sh. Ramit Kuthiala - Himachal Pradesh.
-
Benami Transactions and Presumption of Benefit - When property is purchased in the name of a wife or child, courts generally presume the transaction was for their benefit unless the purchaser can prove it was a gift or for other purposes. The source of funds is critical in establishing whether the transaction is benami. The burden of proof lies on the person claiming the property is benami DARYAO SINGH VS HALKIBAI - Madhya Pradesh, Parbati Gangaram Aggarwal VS Firm Jai Ram Dass Bhagat Ram - Punjab and Haryana.
-
Earnest Money and Purchase Validity - The payment of earnest money by the husband or in his name, especially when intended for the benefit of the wife, supports the claim that the property was purchased for her benefit. Courts have held that earnest money paid and utilized for property purchase indicates genuine intent, and such transactions are often presumed to benefit the wife or family unless challenged SIDDHESWAR PRASAD SINGH VS BHABA SUNDARI PRAMANICK SHA - Calcutta, Jose Pedro Longuinhas Almeida Coutinho VS Vassanta Vitola Camotim and wife - Goa.
-
Legal Presumptions and Benefit of the Wife/Family - In cases where property is purchased in the name of a wife or child, and there is no evidence to suggest a benami intent, the transaction is presumed to be for their benefit. The courts emphasize the importance of the source of funds and conduct of the parties in determining ownership and intent Jhandu (since deceased) through LRs VS Atalvir - Punjab and Haryana, Sandeep Sethi VS Nidhi Kuthiala - Current Civil Cases.
-
Summary and Conclusion - Overall, property purchased by a husband in his wife's name using his funds, including earnest money, is generally presumed to be for her benefit unless proven otherwise. The source of purchase money and conduct of the parties are key factors in establishing whether the transaction is benami or genuine. Courts tend to favor the presumption of benefit to family members in such cases, but the burden of proof remains on the party claiming benami status Pardeep Kumar Bhasin (since Deceased) Through Lrs VS Seema Bhasin - Punjab and Haryana, Sandeep Sethi, S/o. Shri Ashok Sethi VS Nidhi Kuthiala, W/o. Sh. Ramit Kuthiala - Himachal Pradesh.
References: - SIDDHESWAR PRASAD SINGH VS BHABA SUNDARI PRAMANICK SHA - Calcutta - DARYAO SINGH VS HALKIBAI - Madhya Pradesh - Jhandu (since deceased) through LRs VS Atalvir - Punjab and Haryana - STATE BANK OF INDIA VS UNION OF INDIA - Delhi - Sandeep Sethi, S/o. Shri Ashok Sethi VS Nidhi Kuthiala, W/o. Sh. Ramit Kuthiala - Himachal Pradesh - Pardeep Kumar Bhasin (since Deceased) Through Lrs VS Seema Bhasin - Punjab and Haryana - Parbati Gangaram Aggarwal VS Firm Jai Ram Dass Bhagat Ram - Punjab and Haryana - Mohamed Amir Ali Khan VS Khaja Jamaluddin, Minor, by mother and guardian Aziz Khatoon - Andhra Pradesh - Sandeep Sethi VS Nidhi Kuthiala - Current Civil Cases - Jose Pedro Longuinhas Almeida Coutinho VS Vassanta Vitola Camotim and wife - Goa
Search Results for "Property Purchased by Wife in her Name with Hisband s Earnest Money"
1977 0 Supreme(Cal) 249 • India - Calcutta
N.C.MUKHERJI, B.C.RAY
Defendant No. 2, who purchased the property from defendant No. 1, claimed to be a bona fide purchaser for value without notice of ... , and received an earnest money of Rs. 4,000. ... of the property. ... W. 1 himself the price of Rs. 6,000 for 8 cottahs of land with pucca structures thereon is very low and that is why the property has been purchased by defendant No. 2 for Rs. 14,000, which appears to be reasonable and proper value We, therefore, hol....
1976 0 Supreme(MP) 10 • India - Madhya Pradesh
R.K.TANKHA, A.P.SEN
with the funds of the father and brother - object was that the property should belong to the persons in whose name property purchased-mutation ... There was apparently no reason for Ganesh Singh to purchase the property benami in their names. [Para 15] ... ... A Benami transaction is one where one buys property in the name ... There, the husband purchased the property in the name#HL_EN....
2016 0 Supreme(P&H) 2238 • India - Punjab and Haryana
AMOL RATTAN SINGH
money, and the bonafide purchaser status of the defendants. ... Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the plaintiff was entitled to recovery of the earnest money along with interest, and ... Issues: The issues included the entitlement to possession, the validity of agreements and sale deeds, recovery of earnest ... the name of the stamp vendor from whom he had purchased stamp paper. ... ... It was further held by that Court that DW-2, Satpal, husband#HL_E....
2013 0 Supreme(Del) 400 • India - Delhi
RAJIV SHAKDHER
Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators Act, 1976 - Section 6 & 11 - COFEPOSA - Order of freezing of account - Money ... Kapoor submitted that in terms of the Scheme, once earnest money had been received by SBI to purchase the gold on behalf of respondent nos.6 and 7 in terms of the Scheme, the money became the property of SBI. ... Kapoor submitted that since, SBI had already utilized the earnest money transmitted to it, to purchase#HL_....
2022 0 Supreme(HP) 634 • India - Himachal Pradesh
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
It appears from conduct of Judgment Debtor that in suit filed for specific performance of agreement to sell suit property ... is proved, that said property had been purchased for benefit of wife. ... In terms of compromise, Nidhi Kuthiala had agreed to pay double amount of earnest money of Rs.1,50,00,000/-, i.e. ... that person; shall not be considered as a Benami transaction, and such purchase of property, unless contrary is proved, shall be presume....
2018 0 Supreme(P&H) 4499 • India - Punjab and Haryana
LISA GILL
for the purchase of property in the name of his wife or unmarried daughter. ... Fact of the Case: The appellant, plaintiff, filed a suit seeking a declaration as the real owner of a house purchased ... in the name of his wife, with consequential relief of permanent injunction. ... It was accepted that the property was purchased by the husband for the benefit of his wife and therefore, she was in....
1960 0 Supreme(P&H) 191 • India - Punjab and Haryana
I.D.DUA, P.C.PANDIT
In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that a purchase made by a person in the name of their child or wife ... Whether the purchase of the property in the names of the plaintiffs was intended to be a gift or advancement to them? ... The main criterion for determining whether a transaction is benami is the source of the purchase money. 3. ... This is an authority for the proposition that a purchase by an Indian of the #HL_START....
1964 0 Supreme(AP) 5 • India - Andhra Pradesh
CHANDRASEKHARA SASTRI, MANOHAR PERSHAD
from him by representing that he would purchase a house in the plaintiff's name using funds from the Court of Wards. ... on the remaining payment, resulting in the lapse of the earnest money. ... Whether the amount of Rs. 10,000 was paid to the defendant by way of loan or earnest money. 2. ... They could have instead said that this property was purchased for their son Khaja jamaluddin by them and they have agreed to pay the balance of the sale consid....
• India - Current Civil Cases
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
been purchased for benefit of wife/child – Judgment Debtor was absolute owner of suit property and was having every right to sell ... Agreement to Sell – Execution Application – Objections against – Any property purchased by person in name ... but was ostensible owner and it was and is Objector who was and is in possession of property – Being husband, he may be residing ... is proved, that said property had been purchased#....
1967 0 Supreme(Goa) 28 • India - Goa
V.S.JETLEY
CONTRACT - SALE OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY - LIABILITY OF WIFE OF VENDOR - DEMARCATION OF AREA - CAVEAT EMPTOR - SUIT FOR DOUBLE EARNEST ... Article 1548 of the Civil Code provides that a wife will not be liable on a contract for purchase of an immovable property executed ... A sum of Rs. 5,000 was paid as earnest money. The balance was payable within 60 days. ... The substance of this paragraph is that a contract for purchase of an immo....
Filter by Legal Phrase
