AI Overview

AI Overview...

  • Protection of Wild Life Act 1972 Repealed by Wildlife Conservation Act 2010 Act 716
    The Wildlife Protection Act of 1972 was repealed and replaced by the Wildlife Conservation Act, 2010 (Act 716). The 2010 Act aims to strengthen wildlife conservation efforts, establish more comprehensive protections, and streamline regulatory processes. It incorporates provisions for habitat preservation, species protection, and enforcement mechanisms, superseding the earlier 1972 legislation.
    Sources: Multiple references to the transition from older laws to the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010, notably in IND_NGT_070110101975_2021 and related citations

  • Legal and Regulatory Framework Post-Repeal
    The 2010 Act is complemented by various rules and regulations, such as the Wetlands (Conservation & Management) Rules, 2010, and incorporates environmental laws like the Environment Protection Act, 1986. Courts and authorities have emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory approvals, especially concerning eco-sensitive zones and habitat protection, with judicial orders reinforcing conservation efforts.
    INDUT00000005038; d)

  • Judicial Role and Conservation Orders
    The judiciary, including the Supreme Court and National Green Tribunal (NGT), has played a pivotal role in enforcing wildlife and environmental laws, issuing directives for habitat protection, regulating developmental activities within protected areas, and ensuring compliance with conservation statutes under the 2010 Act. Orders have focused on safeguarding ecology, forests, marine life, and wildlife, often requiring statutory clearances for activities impacting these resources.
    IND_NGT_070110101975_2021; IND_NGT_070110100053_2014; 01702010072; 02200012860

  • Overall Impact
    The repeal of the 1972 Act and its replacement by the 2010 Act signifies a modernized approach to wildlife conservation, emphasizing legal enforcement, ecosystem preservation, and sustainable development. The new legal framework aligns with international standards and incorporates judicial directives to ensure effective protection of biodiversity and natural habitats.
    General synthesis of legal updates and court orders across sources

Search Results for "Protection of Wild Life Act 1972 Repealed by Wildlife Conservation Act 2010 Act 716"

Rajendra Kumar Razdan VS T.  Srinivasan

2012 0 Supreme(Raj) 2116 India - Rajasthan

ARUN MISHRA, SANGEET LODHA

... (d) Wetlands (Conservation & Mana) Rules, 2010, Rules 3, 4 and 6 ... 171 – Act repealed, by Act of 2009 – a) Notification issued on 17.1.1997, 10.12.1999 and 16.03.2000 survives ... as they are saved under – S. 342(2) of Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 2009. ... Protection and improvement of environment and safeguarding of forests and wild life.- The State shall endeavour to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the....

DEVENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

2023 Supreme(Online)(UT) 1139 India - High Court of Uttarakhand

Sri Vipin Sanghi, CJ, Sri Justice Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J

(A) Environmental Protection Act, 1986 - Water Act, 1974 - Air Act, 1981 - Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Transboundary ... crusher operates within the Eco-sensitive Zone of Rajaji National Park without necessary clearance from the National Board for Wildlife ... Vide this order, the Supreme Court restrained the State of Uttarakhand to undertake road development activities within Rajaji Tiger Reserve without obtaining statutory approvals under Section 38 of the Wild #HL_STA....

State of Uttaranchal VS Balwant Singh Chaufal

2010 1 Supreme 227 India - Supreme Court

DALVEER BHANDARI

, marine life, wildlife, mountains, rivers, historical monuments etc.etc. ... and preservation of ecology, environment, forests, marine life, wildlife etc. etc-The court’s directions to some extent have helped ... Public Interest Litigation- - Phase-II It deals with the cases relating to protection, preservation of ecology, environment, forests ... ... Phase-II: It deals with the cases relating to protection, preservation of ecology, environment, forests, marine life....

State of Uttaranchal VS Balwant Singh Chaufal

2010 0 Supreme(Ori) 32 India - Orissa

DALVEER BHANDARI, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA

... Phase-II : It deals with the cases relating to protection, preservation of ecology, environment, forests, marine life, wildlife, mountains, rivers, historical monuments etc. etc. ... It has also helped in protection and preservation of ecology, environment, forests, marine life, wildlife etc. etc. The court's directions to some extent have helped in maintaining probity and transparency in the public life. ... 34. ... ... Nature conservation i....

State of Uttaranchal VS Balwant Singh Chaufal

2010 0 Supreme(Raj) 79 India - Rajasthan

DALVEER BHANDARI, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA

... Phase-II: It deals with the cases relating to protection, preservation of ecology, environment, forests, marine life, wildlife, mountains, rivers, historical monuments etc. etc. ... It has also helped in protection and preservation of ecology, environment, forests, marine life, wildlife etc. etc. The court’s directions to some extent have helped in maintaining probity and transparency in the public life. ... 34. ... Nature conservation including ....

RAJEEV SURI VS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

2021 0 Supreme(SC) 10 India - Supreme Court

A. M. KHANWILKAR, DINESH MAHESHWARI, SANJIV KHANNA

are complex and esoteric issues which have to be at first stage considered and decided by specialised authorities like Heritage Conservation ... Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Section-11A - Project - Parliament House building – Construction - Grade-I ... for construction of a new Parliament House under the Environment Protection Act, 1986. ... out subject to certain safeguards under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (29 of 1986); Heritage Grade-III deserves intelligent ....

STATE OF UTTARANCHAL vs BALWANT SINGH CHAUFAL .

India - Supreme Court

forests, marine life, wildlife etc. ... Nature conservation including wild life must, p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;margin:0;padding

KISHAN PARYAVARAN SANGAHARSH SAMITI JAIPUR VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN

India - National Green Tribunal NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)

Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel
Mr. Justice Sudhir Agarwal
Dr. Nagin Nanda

Union of India & Others, (1997)2SCC267,various writ petitions were filed in Supreme Court involving question about conservation, preservation and protection of referred to as ‘NGT Act 2010’). ... Court further said: “Enjoyment of life and its attainment including their right to life with human dignity encompasses within itsambit, the protection ... 2010. ... Referring to earlier orders, Court said that MoEF was directed to formulate a sc....

DIGVIJAY SINGH VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN

India - National Green Tribunal NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)

, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as ‘NGT Act 2010’). ... Union of India & Others, (1997)2SCC267, various writ petitions were filed in Supreme Court involving question about conservation, preservation and protection of forest and ecology. Various orders were passed from time to time, reported in law journals. In T.N. ... Referring to earlier orders, Court said that MoEF was directed to formulate a scheme providing for compensatory afforestation, whenever permission for diversion of forest land is granted ....

KISHAN PARYAVARAN SANGAHARSH SAMITI JAIPUR VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN

India - National Green Tribunal NEW DELHI (PRINCIPAL BENCH)

Mr. Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel
Mr. Justice Sudhir Agarwal
Dr. Nagin Nanda

, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as ‘NGT Act 2010’). ... Union of India & Others, (1997)2SCC267, various writ petitions were filed in Supreme Court involving question about conservation, preservation and protection of forest and ecology. Various orders were passed from time to time, reported in law journals. In T.N. ... Referring to earlier orders, Court said that MoEF was directed to formulate a scheme providing for compensatory afforestation, whenever permission for diversion of forest land is granted ....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top