AI Overview

AI Overview...

#ProtocolOf1990, #IndianArbitrationLaw, #TripleTalaqCase

Understanding the Protocol of 1990 in Indian Legal Context


The term Protocol of 1990 appears in various Indian legal judgments, often referring to specific agreements, conventions, or legislative contexts from around 1990. While not a single unified document, it surfaces in pivotal Supreme Court cases spanning arbitration, personal laws, criminal evidence, and constitutional rights. This blog post breaks down key interpretations and rulings, drawing from landmark decisions to clarify its significance. Note: This is general information based on public judgments; consult a qualified lawyer for specific advice, as legal outcomes depend on individual facts.


Arbitration Law and the Protocol of 1990


One prominent reference is in arbitration disputes under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Courts have examined protocols tied to international agreements executed around 1990.


Bharat Aluminium Co. v. Kaiser Aluminium (BALCO Case)


In the landmark BALCO case Bharat Aluminium Co. Ltd. VS Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc. - 2012 Supreme(SC) 596, the Supreme Court addressed the territoriality principle. An agreement dated April 22, 1993, contained an arbitration clause with arbitration seated in London under English law, but governed by Indian substantive law. Disputes led to awards in England in 2002.


Key holdings:
- Part I of the 1996 Act applies only to arbitrations seated in India (Section 2(2)).
- The court overruled Bhatia International (2002), clarifying: Section 2(2) is an express parliamentary declaration/ recognition that Part I of the Arbitration Act, 1996 applies to arbitration having their place/seat in India and does not apply to arbitrations seated in foreign territories. Bharat Aluminium Co. Ltd. VS Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc. - 2012 Supreme(SC) 596
- Protocols from earlier conventions (e.g., 1923 Protocol, 1937 Act) were referenced historically, but the 1996 Act adopted UNCITRAL Model Law's territoriality.


This ruling emphasized seat-centric arbitration: If parties by agreement providing for a seat / place of arbitration outside India, then Part I of the Act not be applicable. Implications for foreign-seated arbitrations remain crucial today Bharat Aluminium Co. Ltd. VS Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc. - 2012 Supreme(SC) 596.


Other Arbitration Protocols


References to 1990-era protocols appear in cases like group company arbitrations CHLORO CONTROLS (I) P. LTD. VS SEVERN TRENT WATER PURIFICATION INC. - 2012 Supreme(SC) 681, where courts allowed reference even for non-signatories if part of a composite transaction: In the cases of group companies or where various agreements constitute a composite transaction like mother agreement... the court may have to make reference to arbitration. Compliance with procedural protocols is mandatory before invoking Section 11(6) Saini Electrical Works vs Public Works Department.


Triple Talaq and Shariat Application Act, 1937


The Shayara Bano v. Union of India case Shayara Bano VS Union of India - 2017 5 Supreme 577 declared triple talaq (talaq-e-biddat) unconstitutional by a 3:2 majority. While not directly a 1990 protocol, it ties to personal law protocols and historical Shariat applications.



  • Majority view (Kurian Joseph, Nariman, Lalit JJ): Triple talaq lacks Quranic sanctity and is manifestly arbitrary, violating Article 14. This form of Talaq is manifestly arbitrary in the sense that marital tie can be broken capriciously and whimsically by a Muslim man without any attempt at reconciliation. Shayara Bano VS Union of India - 2017 5 Supreme 577

  • Minority (Khehar CJI): Advocated legislative intervention under Article 142, temporarily injuncting the practice.


The 1937 Act enforces Shariat but doesn't codify triple talaq procedures, rendering it void under Article 13(1). This 2017 ruling revolutionized Muslim personal law Shayara Bano VS Union of India - 2017 5 Supreme 577.


NDPS Act, Confessions, and Evidence Protocols


Union of India v. Mohanlal TOFAN SINGH VS STATE OF TAMIL NADU - 2021 2 Supreme 1 clarified evidentiary rules under the NDPS Act, 1985. Officers under Sections 42/53 are police officers per Evidence Act Section 25, barring confessional statements.



  • Officers who are invested with powers under Section 53 of NDPS Act are 'police officers' within meaning of Section 25 of Evidence Act. Any confessional statement made to them cannot be taken into evidence. TOFAN SINGH VS STATE OF TAMIL NADU - 2021 2 Supreme 1

  • Protocols for examination (Section 67) are for inquiry, not confessions, aligning with Article 20(3) protections.


This protects against self-incrimination in stringent NDPS cases.


Other Contexts: Protocols in Contracts, Employment, and More



| Case ID | Key Theme | Ruling Summary |
|---------|-----------|----------------|
| Bharat Aluminium Co. Ltd. VS Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc. - 2012 Supreme(SC) 596 | Arbitration Territoriality | Part I limited to India-seated arbitrations |
| Shayara Bano VS Union of India - 2017 5 Supreme 577 | Triple Talaq | Unconstitutional under Article 14 |
| TOFAN SINGH VS STATE OF TAMIL NADU - 2021 2 Supreme 1 | NDPS Confessions | Barred as to police officers |
| CHLORO CONTROLS (I) P. LTD. VS SEVERN TRENT WATER PURIFICATION INC. - 2012 Supreme(SC) 681 | Group Arbitration | Non-signatories may be referred |


Key Takeaways from Protocol of 1990 References



These cases illustrate how 1990-era protocols shape modern Indian jurisprudence, promoting fairness and constitutional values. For tailored advice, professional legal consultation is recommended.


This post synthesizes public judgments for educational purposes only.

Search Results for "Protocol of 1990: Key Indian Legal Cases Explained"

Bharat Aluminium Co.  Ltd.  VS Kaiser Aluminium Technical Service, Inc.  - 2012 Supreme(SC) 596

2012 0 Supreme(SC) 596 India - Supreme Court

S. H. KAPADIA, D. K. JAIN, S. S. NIJJAR, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR

the agreement. ... The agreement contained an arbitration clause for resolution of disputes arising out of the contract. ... ... The governing law of the agreement was the prevailing law of India ... Protocol". ... The 1923 Protocol proved to be inadequate. ... It was to give effect to both the 1923 Protocol and 1927 Convention that the Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act, 1937 was

Shayara Bano VS Union of India - 2017 5 Supreme 577

2017 5 Supreme 577 India - Supreme Court

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, KURIAN JOSEPH, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. ABDUL NAZEER

a majority of 3:2. ... each of separate entities under Article 25. ... takes form of pitting religion against other constitutional rights – Reconciliation between the same is possible but process of ... 1997), and the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1999). ... the written statement on 5-12-1990. ... India being a founding member of the United Nations, is bound by i....

TOFAN SINGH VS STATE OF TAMIL NADU - 2021 2 Supreme 1

2021 2 Supreme 1 India - Supreme Court

ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, NAVIN SINHA, INDIRA BANERJEE

and circumstances of case – “Examination” of such person is only for the purpose of gathering information so as to satisfy himself ... of Evidence Act – Designated officer under Section 53, invested with powers of an officer in charge of a police station, is ... “police officers” within meaning of Section 25 of Evidence Act as a result of which any confessional statement made to them would ... of narcotics control....

Ashoka Marketing LTD. : Sahu Jain Services LTD. : K. B. Parsai: Bennett Coleman And Company LTD.  VS Punjab National Bank: Punjab National Bank: Union Of India: Life Insurance Corporation Of India - 1990 Supreme(SC) 412

1990 0 Supreme(SC) 412 India - Supreme Court

S. C. AGRAWAL, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, M. H. KANIA, K. N. SAIKIA, B. C. RAY

HIGH COURT RIGHTLY HELD THAT NEITHER PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 7 OR 8 OF THE PUNJAB ... THE RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED BY THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION VIOLATED RIGHTS CONTAINED IN ARTICLE 19(l)(g) - PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION OF ... Since statutory interpretation has no conventional protocol, cases of such conflict have to be decided in reference to the object ... We are in agreement of the said view of the High Court. ... We are in agreement wi....

CHLORO CONTROLS (I) P.  LTD.  VS SEVERN TRENT WATER PURIFICATION INC.  - 2012 Supreme(SC) 681

2012 0 Supreme(SC) 681 India - Supreme Court

A. K. PATNAIK, SWATANTER KUMAR, S. H. KAPADIA

like mother agreement and all other agreements being ancillary to and for effective and complete implementation of the Mother Agreement ... Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 45 - Arbitration - Agreement - Defendants in that suit ... had taken out another Notice of Motion, under Section 8 read with Section 5 of the Act 1996 claiming that arbitration clauses in ... Further, the protocol on Arbitration Clauses (for short ‘Geneva Convention’) was also incor....

Mahila Utkarsh Trust VS Union of India Thro Secretary - 2013 Supreme(Guj) 497

2013 0 Supreme(Guj) 497 India - Gujarat

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, J.B.PARDIWALA

women employees to work in night shift — Constitutional validity of the provision — Finding of — Having considered the number of ... no manner of doubt. ... In addition, it will be also the duty of the employer to make arrangements for transportation of the female employees who work in ... Under the provisions of the Protocol relating to Convention No. 89, known as the Protocol of 1990#H....

Assessing Officer Circle (International Taxation), New Delhi VS Nestle S. A.  - 2023 Supreme(SC) 1063

2023 0 Supreme(SC) 1063 India - Supreme Court

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, DIPANKAR DATTA

Decidendi: The court emphasized that provisions within DTAAs require clarity in their application and that supplementary agreements or protocols ... OECD at the time of the treaty's signing, not retrospectively affecting future memberships of third countries. ... (Para 88) ... ... (B) The principle of automatic application of lower tax rates under MFN clauses requires explicit ... or overridden by any Convention, Agreement or Protocol signed after ....

M CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR vs KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION - 2012 Supreme(Online)(KER) 49847

2012 Supreme(Online)(KER) 49847 India - High Court of Kerala

B.P.RAY, J

1990 agreement. ... had been denied, per a bilateral agreement. ... Ratio Decidendi: The court recognized the right to promotion as per the bilateral agreement and previous judgments, mandating ... As per the bilateral agreement dated 28.12.1990, the petitioners are eligible for getting grade promotion on attaining 25 years of ... in the light of Ext.P2 judgment, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy....

V. SALIL Vs N.C. SENAN - 2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 554

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 554 India - High Court of Kerala

A.HARIPRASAD, J

Fact of the Case: The appellant sought specific performance of a 1990 agreement to sell property by the deceased, who ... The case hinged on the validity of the agreement and its timing. ... Finding of the Court: Both the trial court and lower appellate court found the agreement was not a genuine document ... Though it was allegedly executed on 12.12.1990, the suit was laid only after a period of 14 years. ... Suit....

Keshav Tukaram Taware VS Sulochana Shankar Kolekar - 2018 Supreme(Bom) 2267

2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 2267 India - Bombay

K.K.TATED, SARANG V.KOTWAL

Act, 2000]Fact of the Case: The Appellant filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for development of ... agreement, Section 36A of The Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, Caste Certificates ... Land Revenue Code, 1966, Section 36A - The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Caste Certificates Act, 2000 - [12/03/1990 ... It is the case of the Appellant in the plaint, that,....

Assessing Officer Circle (International Taxation), New Delhi VS Nestle S. A.

2023 0 Supreme(SC) 1063 India - Supreme Court

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, DIPANKAR DATTA

CWT, (1990) 3 SCC 624 : 1990 SCC (Tax) 364 : AIR 1991 SC 1866]. The true intention has to be contextually culled out.”51. ... The plain reading of that notification shows that the Protocol itself was triggered by the benefit granted to the United States - with which India entered into a DTAA in 1990; Germany with which India entered into a DTAA in 1996; Sweden with which India entered into a DTAA in 1997 and the U.K. with which ... The DTAA between India and USA had been entered into force, on 18.12.1990#HL_END....

GOVINDER SINGH  Vs TEJINDER SINGH & ORS - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46349

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 46349 India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

14.3 Valid Cancellation of Documents by Defendant No.1- It was submitted that the mother validly cancelled all prior arrangements, including the Protocol dated 23.10.1987 and the MFS, by letter dated 28.10.1990. ... 15.3 Invalidity of Alleged Unilateral Cancellation by the Defendant No.1- It was submitted that the mother, Defendant No.1, could not have unilaterally cancelled the Protocol dated 23.10.1987 and the MFS dated 15.09.1988 by her letter dated 28.10.1990, as the said documents ... At this stage it would be appro....

Saini Electrical Works vs Public Works Department

India - Delhi High Court

C.HARI SHANKAR

Sehrawat seeks leave to withdraw this petition, with liberty to re-approach the Court after following the protocol prescribed in Clause 25 of the Agreement. 2. ... Sehrawat, learned counsel for the petitioner, being drawn to the fact that the protocol prescribed in Clause 25 of the Agreement between the parties has not been strictly complied with and that, therefore, invocation of Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 at this stage may not

BEAT ALL SPORTS vs STATE TRADING CORP OF INDIA (STC)

India - Delhi High Court

No. 511A/1990 and I.A. ... A perusal of the said documents also shows that the 2008:DHC:2546 CS(OS) No. 511/1990 Page 6 of 10 protocol dated 24.6.1980 was between the respondent/STC and the foreign duly took notice of the fresh protocol entered into between the foreign buyer and the respondent/STC on 24.6.1980 and returned his findings to the effect that the said protocol ... Union of India, AIR 1990 SC 1340). 11. ... The award dated 18.1.#HL_STAR....

BEAT ALL SPORTS vs STATE TRADING CORP OF INDIA (STC)

India - Delhi High Court

No. 511A/1990 and I.A. ... A perusal of the said documents also shows that the CS(OS) No. 511/1990 Page 6 of 10 protocol dated 24.6.1980 was between the respondent/STC and the foreign buyer alone. ... A perusal of the impugned award shows that the learned Arbitrator duly took notice of the fresh protocol entered into between the foreign buyer and the respondent/STC on 24.6.1980 and returned his findings to the effect that the said protocol ... Union of India, AIR 1....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top