AI Overview...

Rajender Singh Pathania - Named as a respondent in multiple legal cases involving allegations of police misconduct, violations of fundamental rights, and issues related to investigations and compensation. Specifically, he is referenced in cases concerning police actions, rights violations, and judicial inquiries Rajender Singh Pathania VS State of N. C. T. of Delhi - Crimes Rajender Singh Pathania VS State of N. C. T. of Delhi - Supreme Court Rajender Singh Pathania VS State of N. C. T. of Delhi - Orissa Dattatraya VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay Fayyaz VS State of Maharashtra Through its Chief Secretary, Home Department - Bombay BHARAT VALJI HANGAMA VS STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat K. V. Rajendran VS Superintendent of Police, CBCID South Zone, Chennai - Crimes Aiasha Rani VS State Of Haryana And Another - Punjab and Haryana Prashant Pradhan @ Prashant Kumar Pradhan VS State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Home, Jharkhand, Ranchi - Jharkhand.
Legal Proceedings & Judicial References - Several cases cite Rajender Singh Pathania in the context of Supreme Court judgments and legal principles related to police conduct, compensation for rights violations, and the need for proper investigations. Notable references include Supreme Court cases like Rajender Singh Pathania & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi (2011 SCC 329) and Vijay Lahu Patil v. State of Maharashtra (2014 Mh.L.J.), emphasizing the importance of fair inquiry and accountability Dattatraya VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay Fayyaz VS State of Maharashtra Through its Chief Secretary, Home Department - Bombay BHARAT VALJI HANGAMA VS STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat K. V. Rajendran VS Superintendent of Police, CBCID South Zone, Chennai - Crimes.
Specific Incidents Mentioned - The sources describe a communication on 3.2.2007 between Aushutosh Kumar, MM, and Rajender Singh Pathania, SHO, regarding an incident involving police patrols and a fight between individuals, highlighting issues of police presence and response Rajender Singh Pathania VS State of N. C. T. of Delhi - Crimes Rajender Singh Pathania VS State of N. C. T. of Delhi - Supreme Court Rajender Singh Pathania VS State of N. C. T. of Delhi - Orissa.
Legal Principles & Judgments - The cases reflect judicial emphasis on proper investigation, accountability of police officials, and the right to life, with references to landmark judgments and principles related to police conduct, compensation, and judicial oversight Dattatraya VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay K. V. Rajendran VS Superintendent of Police, CBCID South Zone, Chennai - Crimes Aiasha Rani VS State Of Haryana And Another - Punjab and Haryana.

Analysis and Conclusion

Rajender Singh Pathania appears prominently in legal contexts related to police accountability, rights violations, and judicial review. The references indicate his involvement as a police officer or official implicated in cases requiring investigation, accountability, and compensation. The judicial references underscore the importance of proper inquiry and adherence to constitutional rights in cases involving police misconduct. Overall, the sources collectively portray Rajender Singh Pathania as a significant figure in cases emphasizing police responsibility and judicial oversight Rajender Singh Pathania VS State of N. C. T. of Delhi - Crimes Rajender Singh Pathania VS State of N. C. T. of Delhi - Supreme Court Rajender Singh Pathania VS State of N. C. T. of Delhi - Orissa Dattatraya VS State of Maharashtra - Bombay Fayyaz VS State of Maharashtra Through its Chief Secretary, Home Department - Bombay BHARAT VALJI HANGAMA VS STATE OF GUJARAT - Gujarat K. V. Rajendran VS Superintendent of Police, CBCID South Zone, Chennai - Crimes Aiasha Rani VS State Of Haryana And Another - Punjab and Haryana Prashant Pradhan @ Prashant Kumar Pradhan VS State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Home, Jharkhand, Ranchi - Jharkhand.

Search Results for "Rajender Singh Pathania"

Rajender Singh Pathania VS State of N. C. T. of Delhi

• India - Crimes

P.SATHASIVAM, B.S.CHAUHAN

It was further pointed out that Shri Aushutosh Kumar, MM, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi from his mobile No. 9868932336 had a talk with appellant no.1-Rajender Singh Pathania, SHO, PS Samaipur Badli, at 10.00 P.M. on his mobile No. 9810030663 for more than three minutes on 3.2.2007. ... In Sube Singh v. ... On 3.2.2007, Constable Virender Kumar, Head Constable Krishan Singh and Constable Jai Kumar, appellant nos. 2 to 4 respectively while patrolling in the area found that Sanjeev Kumar Singh....

2011 8 Supreme 134 • India - Supreme Court

P.SATHASIVAM, B.S.CHAUHAN

2011 0 Supreme(Ori) 266 • India - Orissa

B.S.CHAUHAN, P.SATHASIVAM

It was further pointed out that Shri Aushutosh Kumar, MM, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi from his mobile No. 9868932336 had a talk with appellant no.1-Rajender Singh Pathania, SHO, PS Samaipur Badli, at 10.00 P.M. on his mobile No. 9810030663 for more than three minutes on 3.2.2007. ... ... 18.In Sube Singh v. ... that Sanjeev Kumar Singh and Dalip Gupta, respondent nos.3 and 4 respectively were fighting with each other in an intoxicated condition. ... ... (See also: Munshi Singh Gautam (....

2013 0 Supreme(Bom) 2167 • India - Bombay

K.U.CHANDIWAL, A.I.S.CHEEMA

State of Gujrat and others (2005 (2) Bom.C.R. ( Cri) 279) ... D) Rajender Singh Pathania and others vs. ... In the matter of Rajender Singh Pathania, the issue of award of compensation in case of violation of fundamental rights, was reported. It was observed, before awarding any compensation, there must be a proper inquiry on the question of facts alleged in the plaint. ... The legal position in respect of right to life, allegations of Police atrocities are indicated in the matter of....

Fayyaz VS State of Maharashtra Through its Chief Secretary, Home Department

2015 0 Supreme(Bom) 810 • India - Bombay

T.V.NALAWADE, INDIRA JAIN

For the respondents, the learned APP placed reliance on some reported cases like 2011 (13) SCC 329 [Rajender Singh Pathania & Ors. Vs. State of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors.] and 2014 (2) Mh.L.J. (Cri.) 463 [Vijay Lahu Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.]. ... ... In the cases reported as (1994) 3 Supreme Court Cases 569 [Kartar Singh Vs. State of Punjab] and AIR (37) 1950 Supreme Court 27 [A.K. Gopalan Vs.

K. V. Rajendran VS Superintendent of Police, CBCID South Zone, Chennai

2013 6 Supreme 136 • India - Supreme Court

B.S.CHAUHAN, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, KURIAN JOSEPH

State of Gujarat & Ors., AIR 2011 SC 3168; Rajender Singh Pathania & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors., (2011) 13 SCC 329; and State of Punjab v. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar & Ors. etc., AIR 2012 SC 364).

BHARAT VALJI HANGAMA VS STATE OF GUJARAT

2015 0 Supreme(Guj) 10 • India - Gujarat

J.B.PARDIWALA

I may quote with profit a recent pronouncement of the Supreme Court in the case of Rajender Singh Pathania Vs. ... This issue has been considered by the Supreme Court in Rajender Singh Pathania & ors. Vs. State of N.C.T of Delhi (supra), wherein the Bench observed in paragraphs 17, 18 and 19 as under:- ... "17. ... In Sube Singh v. ... Union of India, AIR 1984 SC 1026; Bhim Singh, MLA v. State of J and K and Ors., AIR 1986 SC 494; Smt. Nilabati Beher....

• India - Crimes

B.S.Chauhan, Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, Kurian Joseph

State of Gujarat & Ors.,6 AIR 2011 SC 3168; Rajender Singh Pathania & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.,7 (2011) 13 SCC 329; and State of Punjab v. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar & Ors. etc.,8 AIR 2012 SC 364).

Aiasha Rani VS State Of Haryana And Another

2018 0 Supreme(P&H) 4161 • India - Punjab and Haryana

DAYA CHAUDHARY

State of Gujarat & Ors. , (2011) AIR SC 3168; Rajender Singh Pathania & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors. , (2011) 13 SCC 329; and State of Punjab v. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar & Ors. Etc. , (2012) 1 RCR(Cri) 126: 2011 (6) Recent Apex Judgments (R.A.J.) 303).

Prashant Pradhan @ Prashant Kumar Pradhan VS State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Home, Jharkhand, Ranchi

2022 0 Supreme(Jhk) 422 • India - Jharkhand

SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI

State of Gujarat, Rajender Singh Pathania v. State (NCT of Delhi) and State of Punjab v. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar.) 14. In Rubabbuddin Sheikh v. ... After giving our thoughtful consideration to the facts and circumstances of this case, we are of the view that the least the High Court could have done in this case was to have directed an independent investigation/enquiry into the mysterious and most tragic abduction and alleged murder of Kulwant Singh

Filter by Legal Phrase

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

approbate-and-reprobate-key-legal-doctrine-explained vague-threatening-phone-calls-why-they-fail-in-court does-scc-own-copyright-on-full-text-judgments g-o-ms-no-108-tn-salesman-packer-recruitment-rules article-226-vs-227-key-differences-in-high-court-powers judgments-on-one-time-gna-charges-in-india tip-judicial-vs-executive-magistrate-rules-explained can-a-sole-dissenting-member-block-society-redevelopment how-to-sue-fake-facebook-accounts-for-defamation-in-india illustrations-person-dominating-will-in-indian-law perusal-in-court-orders-what-it-means-in-law litigant-vigilance-essential-duty-in-court-proceedings what-to-do-if-company-suit-signatory-dies renting-house-without-rent-agreement-in-india-risks stay-on-money-realization-after-ejectment-is-it-possible