Ram Swaroop Singh (1981) - Multiple references to Ram Swaroop Singh in legal cases and incidents from 1981, including criminal, property, and procedural matters. He was involved in a murder case where he was accused of participating in an assault leading to the death of Maheshwar Singh, and was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC (references Ram Ekbal Singh VS State Of Bihar - Patna, Girja VS State - Allahabad, GIRJA VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad).
Legal Proceedings and Disputes - Ram Swaroop was involved in property disputes, including a case where the court declared the property as his private property (reference Ram Bharose Sharma : Deoki Nandan Sharma : State of Rajasthan VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan) and in land share claims where the collector recognized his entitlement to 1/3rd share (reference Ram Swaroop VS Board of Revenue - Rajasthan).
Criminal Incidents - The case involving Ram Swaroop on 2-3-1981 details his involvement in a violent incident resulting in deaths, with post-mortem and inquest reports confirming the deaths of Ram Swaroop and Ratan, and evidence such as blood-stained weapons recovered from the scene (references VED PAL VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad, GIRJA VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad).
Court Cases and Evidence - Courts examined Ram Swaroop's role in various legal contexts, including whether he adequately represented the estate of Vishvanath during an appeal (reference Parmanand VS Ramswaroop - Rajasthan) and whether he was involved in purchasing medicines or other activities, with some testimonies suggesting he was not directly involved in certain acts (reference Gopal Krishna VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan).
Summary of Main Points:
Analysis and Conclusion:
Ram Swaroop Singh of 1981 was actively involved in criminal activities, notably a murder case, and legal disputes concerning property and land rights. His involvement in violent incidents led to convictions, and he appeared frequently in court proceedings related to property and estate matters. The references depict him as a central figure in various legal and criminal contexts during that year.
References: - Ram Ekbal Singh VS State Of Bihar - Patna, Ram Bharose Sharma : Deoki Nandan Sharma : State of Rajasthan VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Girja VS State - Allahabad, Parmanand VS Ramswaroop - Rajasthan, VED PAL VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad, Gopal Krishna VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, GIRJA VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad, Ram Swaroop VS Board of Revenue, Ajmer - Rajasthan, RAM SWAROOP VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad
The prosecution case was that on 12-9-1981, the deceased Maheshwar Singh, who was driving a Tum-tum brought accused appellant Ram ... Swaroop Singh, as the sale deed was not admitted from the side of the prosecution or the heirs of deceased Ram Swaroop Singh and ... Ram Swaroop Singh, father of Maheshwar Singh was assaulted by accused appellant No. 3, Ram Das Singh, by means of Bhala. ... ... 8 It has been found from the record that the occurrence t....
The State Government and Mahant Ram Swaroop filed separate appeals before the Board of Revenue. ... Whether the learned Single Judge erred in declaring the disputed property to be the private property of Mahant Ram Swaroop under ... Mahant Ram Swaroop filed a writ petition challenging the Board of Revenue's order, which was consolidated with another writ petition ... Learned Counsel Shri Rajpurohit appearing for respondent Ram Swaroop during the cour....
The surviving appellants, namely, Girja, Sarua, Ram Sanehi, Raghunath, Ram Swaroop and Brijbhan, were directed to surrender before ... - The judgment and order dated 22.1.1983 passed by the then IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Hamirpur in Sessions Trial No 82 of 1981 ... Girja, Sarua, Ram Sanehi, Raghunath, late Bhoora, Ram Swaroop and Brijbhan were convicted and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC read with Section ....
Whether Ram Swaroop sufficiently represented the estate of Vishvanath deceased? 2. ... Vishvanath died during the pendency of the appeal, and his son Ram Swaroop was brought on record as his legal representative. ... Finding of the Court: The court held that Ram Swaroop alone did not sufficiently represent the estate of Vishvanath ... Therefore, the application of Ram-Swaroop dated March 23, 1981 that as no steps having been taken....
Collector, Nohar on 02.02.1981 holding the plaintiff - Ram Swaroop to be entitled for 1/3rd share in the land in question. ... No issue was framed with regard to rights of Malla vis-a-vis the petitioner Ram Swaroop and, therefore, there was no question of applicability of the principles of res judicata upon the claim of the plaintiff Ram Swaroop. ... Appeal No. 24/1981 taken by the defendants Chandu Ram son of Malla and Bhoop Singh ....
The incident is of 2.3.1981 and on the next day inquest on the dead bodies of the deceased Ram Swaroop and Ratan were conducted and thereafter their dead bodies were sent for post mortem, which were received on 4.3.1981 at 2.30 P. ... W. 3, Prema wife of Ram Swaroop and various other witnesses on 8.3.1981. On 3.3.1981 the Investigating Officer searched the house of accused persons and recovered blood stained lathi from the ‘Baithak’ of accused appell....
It does not appeal to me that Ram Swaroop himself would go to purchase medicines. ... DW 1 Shikhar Chand Jain who is stated to have paid sum of Rs. 15/- to DW 2 Nagendra Kasliwal, the proprietor of Jain Medical Store, was not a Doctor treating PW 2 Ram Swaroop Sharma. He was not known to Ram Swaroop. ... The learned counsel further submitted that the piea taken by the appellant was quite probable and should have been accepted by the learned trial judge in the light of the law laid down....
Girja, Sarua, Ram Sanehi, Raghunath, late Bhoora, Ram Swaroop and Brijbhan were convicted and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC. ... This Court is now concerned only with the appeal of remaining appellants, namely, Girja, Sarua, Ram Sanehi, Raghunath, Ram Swaroop and Brijbhan. ... 3. Prosecution story in brief is that on 20.10.1980 around 8 am. ... Ka-11) under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 302 IPC was subm....
There was directly a conflict of interest between Ram Swaroop and Malla in the former suit. ... The decision in the former suit hits the then defendant, and now the plaintiff, Ram Swaroop fair and square. ... There is no dispute that the question has been finally decided by competent courts and so also that Malla and Ram Swaroop were necessary ... Collector, Nohar on 2.2.1981 holding the plaintiff-Ram Swaroop to be entitled for 1/3r....
On 30.3.1981 the I.O. recorded the statement of informant Nand Kishore, witness Ram Prasad and Dhani Ram. On 1.4.1981 he inspected the spot and prepared the site plan and proved it as Exhibit Ka-12. On the same day, the statement of Ghuru was recorded. ... Further apart from that it was admitted by the other witness and even by the accused (Ram Swaroop) that Ram Swaroop was being called as Jeth. The smell of kerosene oil was present when she was medi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.