AI Overview

AI Overview...

#PhilippineLaw, #RemitVsCondone, #LegalTerms

Remit vs Condone in Philippine Law: Understanding the Key Differences


In legal practice, terms like remit and condone often arise in Philippine jurisprudence, but they carry distinct meanings and applications. While the search query focuses on Philippine law, relevant principles from Indian cases (which share common law roots and are sometimes referenced) provide clarity. This post breaks down the difference between remit and condone under Philippine law, drawing from judicial interpretations to help readers grasp these concepts.


Whether you're a lawyer, student, or involved in a case involving delays, obligations, or settlements, understanding these terms is essential. Note: This is general information based on case analyses and not specific legal advice—consult a qualified attorney for your situation.


What Does 'Remit' Mean in Legal Contexts?


Remit typically refers to the act of reducing, forgiving, or waiving a portion or all of a legal obligation, debt, or penalty. It is unilateral and does not require acceptance from the other party. In contract law, this is prominently seen under Section 63 of the Indian Contract Act (analogous principles apply in Philippine civil law under the Civil Code provisions on obligations and contracts).


Key Features of Remission:



In one case, defendants were absolved from paying interest on a hand-note due to the promisee's remission, which was a unilateral act of grace. Jitendra Chandra Roy Chowdhury VS S. N. Banerjee, Barrister-at-Law - 1942 Supreme(Cal) 84


What Does 'Condone' Mean in Legal Contexts?


Condone, on the other hand, means to forgive or overlook a fault, delay, or offense, often requiring judicial discretion and sufficient cause. It is not unilateral and typically applies to procedural lapses like delays in filing appeals or claims.


Key Features of Condonation:



In a minimum wages case, the authority failed to properly assess sufficient cause, leading to remand. Micro Raj Electronics Pvt. Ltd, Hyderabad, rep. by its Director, V. Krishna Murthy VS Authority under Minimum Wages Act-cum-Joint Commissioner of labour, A. P. Hyderabad - 1995 Supreme(AP) 691


Core Differences: Remit vs Condone


The difference between remit and condone under Philippine law lies in their scope, nature, and application:


| Aspect | Remit | Condone |
|-----------------|------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
| Nature | Unilateral waiver by creditor/party | Judicial forgiveness of fault/delay |
| Requirement| No court approval needed | Sufficient cause + court satisfaction |
| Context | Debts, obligations, settlements | Delays in filings, offenses |
| Effect | Reduces/extinguishes debt | Excuses procedural non-compliance |
| Examples | Remitting interest on loan Jitendra Chandra Roy Chowdhury VS S. N. Banerjee, Barrister-at-Law - 1942 Supreme(Cal) 84 | Condoning appeal delay G. Kothandan VS G. Raja - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 2134 |



In criminal contexts, condonation might appear in compromise scenarios, but differs from quashing under CrPC Section 482, which is about inherent powers, not direct condonation. GIAN SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB - 2012 7 Supreme 1 Narinder Singh VS State of Punjab - 2014 2 Supreme 642


Judicial Insights from Related Cases


Remission in Debt Recovery


In a Debts Recovery Tribunal case, the creditor's settlement remitted part of the debt, and the tribunal's refusal was overturned: The creditor... had an unfettered right to dispense with or remit. USHANIL MERCANTILE PRIVATE LTD. VS UCO BANK - 2006 Supreme(Cal) 155


Condonation in Appeals and Claims



These cases illustrate that while remit is forgiving an obligation, condone excuses a lapse, often needing evidence of sufficient cause.


Practical Implications in Philippine Courts


In the Philippines, remit often arises in civil disputes under the Civil Code (Arts. 1270-1275 on remission). Courts uphold it as voluntary, similar to Indian precedents.


Condone is frequent in labor, criminal, and appellate matters:
- Labor Claims: Condonation requires recorded satisfaction. Micro Raj Electronics Pvt. Ltd, Hyderabad, rep. by its Director, V. Krishna Murthy VS Authority under Minimum Wages Act-cum-Joint Commissioner of labour, A. P. Hyderabad - 1995 Supreme(AP) 691
- Criminal Appeals: Discretion for delays, as in production warrants. National Investigation Agency Through Its Chief Investigating Officer, Jammu VS 3rd Additional Sessions Judge District Court, Jammu - 2022 Supreme(J&K) 684
- Matrimonial: Condonation of cruelty via conduct like cohabitation. Dipak Kumar Roy VS Anjali Roy - 1986 Supreme(Cal) 137


Key Takeaways



  • Remit = Waive a debt/obligation unilaterally.

  • Condone = Forgive a delay/offense judicially.

  • Always provide strong evidence for condonation; remission needs clear intent.

  • Philippine courts apply these flexibly, influenced by common law principles.


For precise application, review specific statutes like the Civil Code or Rules of Court. This analysis draws from precedents to highlight distinctions—legal outcomes vary by facts.


Disclaimer: This post provides general insights from case law and is not legal advice. Laws evolve, and professional counsel is recommended.


National Insurance Company Limited VS Pranay Sethi - 2017 8 Supreme 107 GIAN SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB - 2012 7 Supreme 1 Micro Raj Electronics Pvt. Ltd, Hyderabad, rep. by its Director, V. Krishna Murthy VS Authority under Minimum Wages Act-cum-Joint Commissioner of labour, A. P. Hyderabad - 1995 Supreme(AP) 691 Jitendra Chandra Roy Chowdhury VS S. N. Banerjee, Barrister-at-Law - 1942 Supreme(Cal) 84 USHANIL MERCANTILE PRIVATE LTD. VS UCO BANK - 2006 Supreme(Cal) 155 Dipak Kumar Roy VS Anjali Roy - 1986 Supreme(Cal) 137 National Investigation Agency Through Its Chief Investigating Officer, Jammu VS 3rd Additional Sessions Judge District Court, Jammu - 2022 Supreme(J&K) 684 G. Kothandan VS G. Raja - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 2134 Kalidas Mohapatra Rajkishore Routray Basudev Mohanty Shyamaghana Mishra VS State of Orissa - 2000 Supreme(Ori) 360

Search Results for "Remit vs Condone in Philippine Law: Key Differences"

GIAN SINGH VS STATE OF PUNJAB - 2012 7 Supreme 1

2012 7 Supreme 1 India - Supreme Court

R.M.LODHA, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, ANIL R.DAVE

78~S.482>482 - Inherent power to do complete and substantial justice - Should not be exercised as against the express bar of law ... Joshi1 and the submission made on behalf of the State that B.S. ... offences committed by public servants while working in that capacity, the settlement between offender and victim can have no legal sanction ... On account of default in repayment of loans, the bank filed a suit for recovery of the amount payable by the borrower company.

National Insurance Company Limited VS Pranay Sethi - 2017 8 Supreme 107

2017 8 Supreme 107 India - Supreme Court

DIPAK MISRA, A. K. SIKRI, A. M. KHANWILKAR, D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, ASHOK BHUSHAN

it is therefore desirable that in case of difference of opinion, the question should be authoritatively settled. ... We are inclined to think that there can be some degree of difference as regards the percentage that is meant for or applied to in ... It also analysed the difference between the considerations of the two different methods by this Court in Susamma Thomas (supra) wherein

State Of Haryana VS Bhajan Lal - 1990 Supreme(SC) 740

1990 0 Supreme(SC) 740 India - Supreme Court

S.R.PANDIAN, K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY

Whoever he may be, however high he is, he is under the law. ... Conviction - First Information Report - Everyone whether individually or collectively is unquestionably under the supremacy of law ... a cognizable offence and thereafter rider Section 156(1) a statutory right to investigate any cognizable case without requiring sanction ... under the law. ... offence demanding either the registration of a case or commencement of an investigation; that it would be manifestly unjust to allow

Narinder Singh VS State of Punjab - 2014 2 Supreme 642

2014 2 Supreme 642 India - Supreme Court

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, A.K.SIKRI

Justice Lodha, speaking for the Court, explained the difference between the two provisions in the following manner:

difference is that under Section 320(1) of the Code, no permission is required from the Court in those cases which are compoundable ... purpose of punishment becomes paramount and even if the victim or his relatives have shown the virtue and gentility, agreeing to forgive

Secretary State of Karnataka VS Umadevi - 2006 3 Supreme 415

2006 3 Supreme 415 India - Supreme Court

ARUN KUMAR, P. K. BALASUBRAMANYAN, C. K. THAKKER, Y. K. SABHARWAL, G. P. MATHUR

Going by a law newly enacted. ... favour of such persons for directing the employer, the State or its instrumentalities to absorb them in permanent service or to allow ... The law is dynamic and our Constitution is a living document. ... These two sets of appeals reflect the cleavage of opinion in the High Court of Karnataka based on the difference in approach in two ... They are terms calculated to condone any procedural irregularities and are meant to cure only such defects as are attributable to ... ....

Hemant Sharma VS State Of Haryana - 2020 Supreme(P&H) 37

2020 0 Supreme(P&H) 37 India - Punjab and Haryana

GURVINDER SINGH GILL

Issues: The key issues revolved around the transfer of funds, the alleged agreements for land purchase, and the criminal liability ... Bail - Criminal Law - IPC 406, 420, 506/34 - SummaryFact of the Case: The petitioner seeks bail in a case involving ... allegations of fraudulent land deals and misappropriation of funds. ... but brother-in-law of said Santosh. ... Avdesh had been paid, stands duly established from ....

G.  Kothandan VS G.  Raja - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 2134

2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 2134 India - Madras

R.SUBBIAH, T.KRISHNAVALLI

herein (the daughter of appellant) by transfer of funds through her Bank Account between 01.08.2008 and respectively - Court has ... - Absolutely, no case has been made out by petitioner to condone inordinate delay of 2377 days in filing appeal. ... on merits of the matter at the condone delay stage - For all reasons stated above, and applying decisions of Supreme Court discussed ... respondent herein (the daughter of#HL_E....

National Investigation Agency Through Its Chief Investigating Officer, Jammu VS 3rd Additional Sessions Judge District Court, Jammu - 2022 Supreme(J&K) 684

2022 0 Supreme(J&K) 684 India - Jammu and Kashmir

SANJEEV KUMAR, MOHAN LAL

for Abdul Jabbar, who was in judicial custody, to record his statement regarding a case involving the transfer of funds for terrorism ... for the condonation of delays beyond 90 days. ... Can the delay beyond 90 days in filing an appeal under Section 21 of the NIA Act be condoned? 2. ... and, therefore, condone the same. ... The case relates to large scale transfer of funds from Pakistan to India ....

Jitendra Chandra Roy Chowdhury VS S. N.  Banerjee, Barrister-at-Law - 1942 Supreme(Cal) 84

1942 0 Supreme(Cal) 84 India - Calcutta

PAL, B. K. MUKHERJEA

The defendants were entitled to remit a portion of the obligation under Section 63 of the Contract Act, even though the obligation ... The defendants were entitled to remit a portion of the obligation under Section 63 of the Contract Act, even though the obligation ... The defendants were entitled to remit a portion of the obligation under Section 63 of the Contract Act, even though the obligation ... The word "remit#HL_EN....

DBS BANK INDIA LTD vs STATE OF KERALA - 2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 28016

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 28016 India - High Court of Kerala

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J

Fact of the Case: The petitioner sought directives against respondents for the transfer of funds from a Binance account ... Issues: Whether the court should grant further reliefs to the petitioner requesting transfer and freezing of funds while investigations ... law enforcement to recover misappropriated funds from the Binance account, ultimately deciding no further relief was necessary as ... the Binance team to transfer....

Orient Exchange & Financial Services (P) Ltd. , Represented By Its Director Mr.  Bhaskar Rao P.  VS Asst.  Commissioner Of Customs, Department Of Revenue, Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs, Office Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Customs, Air Cargo Complex, International Airport, Nedumbassery, Cochin - 2024 Supreme(Ker) 807

2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 807 India - Kerala

GOPINATH P.

The Law Dictionaries also give the same meaning. ... There seems to be no qualitative or other difference in the currency notes printed on paper and currency notes printed on plastic/polymer. ... "So also in Jowitt's Dictionary of English Law and Wharton's Law Lexicon we find that the following meaning is given for the word "bullion": "uncoined gold and silver in the mass. ... Wharton's Law Lexicon and Jowitt's Dictionary of English Law state the meaning of "specie" as "metallic money"....

Narcotics Control Bureau vs Gurnam Singh

India - Delhi High Court

S.P.GARG

The premises at Nihal Vihar, Sayad Nangloi, New Delhi belonged to Devinder Singh's father-in-law and it were a residential premises occupied by Devinder Singh's father-in-law and family. Devinder Singh and his family were staying at another place at Janakpuri. ... On 27.01.2003, the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (in short PDEA) seized one ton of Ephedrine, a controlled substance, which was exported by the respondents in furtherance of criminal conspiracy from India to Manila, Philippine. ... It transpired that the E....

NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU vs GURNAM SINGH & ANR.

India - Delhi High Court

The premises at Nihal Vihar, Sayad Nangloi, New Delhi belonged to Devinder Singh’s father-in-law and it were a residential premises occupied by Devinder Singh’s father-in-law and family. ... On 27.01.2003, the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (in short PDEA) seized one ton of Ephedrine, a controlled substance, which was exported by the respondents in furtherance of criminal conspiracy from India to Manila, Philippine. ... Ephedrine at any point of time and had not requisitioned or asked the Philippine#H....

Assessee vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad-3 - 2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 5023

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 5023 India - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Ahmedabad Bench)

Makarand V. MahaDeokar, AM

The workings showed gross income as per Philippine ITR of PHP 33,77,23,647/- (INR Rs.46,54,02,659/-), against which the assessee claimed certain expenses disallowed under local law but permissible under Indian law and vice versa. ... tax law. ... It was explained that the gross income of PHP 33.77 crore (INR 46.54 crore) reported in the Philippine return was reduced for operating and non-allowable expenses, disallowances under Indian law (e.g. depreciation, penal payments, gratuity, le....

M/s. Castlewick FZE vs The ACIT, International Taxation - 2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 5472

2025 Supreme(Online)(ITAT) 5472 India - Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Chennai Bench)

SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VP, SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA, ACM

Article 24(3) deals with the meaning of ‘Philippine tax payable’. ... As per para 3 of Article 24, ‘Philippine tax payable’ shall be deemed to include the amount of Philippine tax which would have been paid if the Philippine tax had not been exempted or reduced in accordance with this DTAA and Special incentive laws designed to promote economic ... The term ‘Philippine tax payable’ shall be deemed to include the amount of Philippine tax which would have been paid if the Phili....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top