AI Overview...
- Returned Amounts after Direction from d d C - Main points and insights:
- Multiple cases involve the direction to return deposited or misappropriated amounts, often with interest or within specified timelines. For example, the Supreme Court and High Courts have directed institutions or individuals to refund amounts paid, sometimes with interest, and within deadlines (e.g., by 31-5-2018 in IND_HC_KLHC010596662016 and 02000019783).
- In cases like Ram Ayodhya Sah VS State of Jharkhand through Central Bureau of Investigation - Jharkhand, the court clarified that keeping funds for a short period (e.g., two months) does not amount to embezzlement or misappropriation, and directed bail release.
- Several judgments emphasize that amounts wrongly collected or deposited must be returned, including tuition fees, development charges, or investment amounts, often with interest (e.g., Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Registrar VS Chairman and Managing Director Transmission Corporation of Telangana Ltd - Supreme Court, Pathan Stone Policing Industries VS Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corpn. Ltd. - Rajasthan, State of Haryana VS Prem Chand - Punjab and Haryana).
- Courts have also addressed procedural irregularities, such as unauthorized deductions or closure of accounts without consent, and ordered refunds of principal and interest (CHIEF POST MASTER GENERAL & 2 ORS. vs GOVARMAL CHHABALDAS ISRANI - Consumer National, Regional Manager VS Bashir Ahmad Rangrez & Brothers - Jammu and Kashmir).
- Analysis and Conclusion:
- The overarching principle in these cases is that any amounts deposited, collected, or misappropriated must be returned to the rightful parties, often with interest, and within a specified timeframe. Courts have consistently directed institutions and authorities to comply with these directions to uphold legal rights and ensure financial accountability. The emphasis is on rectifying wrongful collections or deposits through timely refunds, reinforcing the legal obligation to return amounts after directions from courts or authorities.
Search Results for "Returned Amounts after Direction from d d C"
2016 0 Supreme(Jhk) 517 • India - Jharkhand
RAVI NATH VERMA
in terms of Section 409 and u/s 13(1)(d) – Appellant returned the amount – Mere keeping the amount for approximately two months ... will not amount to embezzlement or mis – appropriation of fund – Direction issued to release appellant on bail. ... money of Jawahar Rojgar Yojna even after cancellation of scheme – No charge was framed for embezzlement or misappropriation of the amount ... Junior Engineers the co-convicts, to return the amounts and the amounts#....
2001 0 Supreme(Bom) 109 • India - Bombay
R.J.KOCHAR
,-Wrongly collected amounts returned-Action by Professors on direction of Principal-Dismissal of Professors with service of long ... depriving professors full back wages and withholding of two increments-NSS Scheme not regular -Scheme does not permit collecting amounts ... It appears that the learned Presiding Officer of the Tribunal was not satisfied with the conduct of the enquiry and therefore, remanded the matter for further enquiry by giving certain directions to the Enquiry Officer. ... The respon....
2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 11758 • India - High Court of Kerala
SHAJI P.CHALY, J
MDS 1/2014, after closure of the chitty transaction, but the amounts were not returned. ... Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of with directions for phased payment of the amounts owed to the petitioner ... Financial - Writ Petition - N/A - This case highlights the legal rights of a petitioner regarding the return of deposited amounts ... Therefore, there will be a direction to respondents 4 and 5 to pay 25% of the amounts outstanding within six weeks fro....
2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 47934 • India - High Court of Kerala
SHAJI P.CHALY, J
Final Decision: The third respondent Bank is directed to return the outstanding amount with interest within three weeks. ... JUDGMENT This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking direction ... The contention of the petitioner in this writ petition is that, petitioner has deposited an amount of Rs. 2,00,000/-with the third respondent Bank in the account specified above.
2018 0 Supreme(SC) 1670 • India - Supreme Court
ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
This direction shall be complied with by the concerned Deemed to be Universities scrupulously and the amounts shall be returned by 31st of May, 2018 and an appropriate affidavit to that extent shall be filed with UGC within a week thereafter”. ... We, further direct that the entire amount paid by such students to the concerned Deemed to be Universities towards tuition fee and all other expenditure for such courses through distance education learning shall be returned by the concerned Deemed to be Univer....
1998 0 Supreme(Raj) 1263 • India - Rajasthan
J.C.VERMA
deposited by the petitioner were ordered to be returned to the petitioner with a further direction that in case the petitioner deposits ... Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed with the direction that the respondents shall accept the development charges ... Section far it relates to the revision of the rate of development charges from Rs. 25/- to Rs. 40/- per sq. mtrs. with a further direction ... For the reasons that the respondents themselves had returned the amount to the....
2021 0 Supreme(SC) 337 • India - Supreme Court
D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, M. R. SHAH
A writ, order or direction for the revival of the project failing which the amounts invested by the petitioners be returned with interest at the rate of 18% per annum; and (iii) A court-monitored probe. ... Invoking the jurisdiction under Article 32, the petitioners have sought, inter alia, the following directions: (i) A writ, order or direction to the respondents to protect the interests and investments of customers/buyers in the larger public interest; (ii) ... …a writ of mandamus, or order or #HL_ST....
2025 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 4142 • India - National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
D.K. JAIN, PRESIDENT, M. SHREESHA, MEMBER
District Forum held deductions unauthorized, affirming payment of interest - State Commission partially allowed appeals, reducing amounts ... On 09.07.2010, without the consent of the Complainants, the Petitioners, closed the aforesaid accounts; deducted the amounts of 3,15,000/-, 5,85,000/- and 1,81,500/- respectively paid to them as interest during the aforesaid investment period of five years and returned the balance principal amounts to ... If there was some technical hitch in the said accounts, the Petitioners ought....
2019 0 Supreme(P&H) 959 • India - Punjab and Haryana
KRISHNA MURARI, ARUN PALLI
It highlights the directions issued by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Orissa Lift Irrigation Corporation Ltd. v. ... This direction shall be complied with by the deemed to be universities concerned scrupulously and the amounts shall be returned by 31-5-2018 and an appropriate affidavit to that extent shall be filed with UGC within a week thereafter." ... However, the entire amount paid by such students to the deemed to be universities concerned towards tuition fees and other expenditure shall be re....
1999 0 Supreme(J&K) 155 • India - Jammu and Kashmir
BHAWANI SINGH, SYED BASHIR-UD-DIN
Amounts deposited by the Appellants were ordered to be returned along with any accrued interest. ... The court also emphasized that the amount must not have been received under protest. ... The court also emphasized that the amount must not have been received under protest. ... Amounts deposited by the Appellants pursuant to the direction of this Court or of its own in this Court or before the Commission are ordered to be returned along with interest that may have ac....
Filter by Legal Phrase
