AI Overview

AI Overview...

Rule 37 of the Telangana Mineral Concession Rules, 1960

  • Main Points and Insights:
  • Rule 37 pertains to the procedures and conditions related to the renewal, surrender, and cancellation of mineral concessions under the Telangana Mineral Concession Rules, 1960.
  • It emphasizes the importance of adhering to prescribed legal processes for the renewal of mineral leases, including submission of applications within stipulated timeframes.
  • The rule also details the grounds and procedures for surrendering a concession and the circumstances under which a concession may be canceled, often involving violation of rules or non-compliance.
  • Penalties for illegal extraction or violation of concession conditions are reaffirmed in related rules and legal provisions, with courts upholding penalties imposed under these rules (see references to Rules 26, 54, and related judicial decisions).

  • Analysis and Conclusion:

  • Rule 37 forms a critical part of the regulatory framework governing mineral concessions in Telangana, ensuring that leaseholders follow formal procedures for renewal and surrender, and that violations are penalized appropriately.
  • The rule aligns with the broader legal framework under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, and its amendments, reinforcing the state's authority to regulate mineral extraction and enforce compliance.
  • Judicial pronouncements have upheld the validity of penalties and procedural requirements under Rule 37, emphasizing the importance of following due process in mineral concession matters.

References: - Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Telangana State Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966, especially Rule 26 and Rule 37 - Judicial decisions affirming penalties and procedural compliance (e.g., Kisan Stone Crusher vs State of Telangana - Telangana, Kisan Stone Crusher vs State of Telangana - Telangana, VUSB Bhushan Kumar VS State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, Mining Department - Andhra Pradesh, Coromandel Mining & Exports Pvt. Ltd. VS Union of India - Andhra Pradesh)

Search Results for "Rule 37 of the Telangana Mineral Concession Rules 1960"

Kisan Stone Crusher vs State of Telangana

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 19421 India - IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

(A) Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 4, 14, 15, and 21 - Telangana State Minor Minerals Concession ... , emphasizing the importance of following prescribed legal avenues in regulatory matters affecting mineral rights. ... Rules, 1966 - Rule 26 - Petition against penalty for alleged illegal quarrying - The court upheld the imposition of penalties as ... TELANGANA STATE MINOR MINERAL CON....

Kisan Stone Crusher vs State of Telangana

2025 0 Supreme(Telangana) 1426 India - IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

(A) Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 14, 15, and 21 - Telangana State Minor Mineral Concession ... concession rules to levy penalties on unauthorized extraction or violation of the rules is reaffirmed. ... Rules, 1966 - Rule 26 - Quarry lease renewal application - Writ petition dismissed against demand of seigniorage fee and penalty ... TELANGANA STATE MINOR MINERAL#HL....

VUSB Bhushan Kumar VS State of Andhra Pradesh rep.  by its Principal Secretary, Mining Department

2018 0 Supreme(AP) 113 India - Andhra Pradesh

B.SIVA SANKARA RAO

Concession Rules, 1966 vide G.O.Ms. ... and consequently impugning different letters bearing of even in respect of extent of hectares reduced area in each – Held, Minor Mineral ... Mines & Minerals Amendment Act, 2015 - sub-section (2) of Section 10A - Section 10 to 16 - Income Tax Act ... 22(4) of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960. ... 22(4) of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960#HL_END....

Coromandel Mining & Exports Pvt.  Ltd.  VS Union of India

2015 0 Supreme(AP) 579 India - Andhra Pradesh

DILIP B.BHOSALE, S.V.BHATT

asked the learned Advocate General for the State of Andhra Pradesh and the learned Additional Advocate General for the State of Telangana ... Constitution of India –Petitions, first, to declare that Sections 8, 10, 11 and 13 of The Mines and Minerals ... respondents to complete processing of their applications for prospecting licences made in accordance with the provisions of Mines and Minerals ... , licence or lease having regard to the provisions of the Principal Act or the Mineral Concession #HL_STAR....

Savita Rawat VS State of M. P.

2016 0 Supreme(MP) 1028 India - Madhya Pradesh

A.M.KHANWILKAR, SANJAY YADAV

Act, 2015 (Amendment Act, 2015), which introduced significant changes to the allocation and grant of mineral concessions in India ... The petitioners included applicants who had applied for mineral concessions prior to the enactment of the Amendment Act, 2015, but ... Other petitioners included those who had been granted in-principle approval for mineral concessions but had not yet executed the ... We, accordingly, hold that irrespective of the stage the application for reconnaissance ....

Namakkal District Stone Crusher, Rep. , by its Secretary, P.  Mani VS State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.  by its Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Chennai

2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 1768 India - Madras

S.MANIKUMAR, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

Tamil Nadu District Mineral Foundation Rules, 2017 - Rules 8, 9, 10 & 11 - Mines and Minerals (Development ... and Regulations) Act, 1957 - Section 9B - Tamil Nadu District Mineral Foundation Rules, 2017 - Rules 8 to 11 - Mines and Minerals ... the provisions of Mines and Mineral Act, 1957, no State Government have power to frame a rule with retrospective effect or to create ... Minor Mineral #HL_....

Healthy Agro Enterprises Pvt Ltd.  VS State of Andhra Pradesh

2021 0 Supreme(AP) 559 India - Andhra Pradesh

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 - Section 9 - Mineral Concession Rules, ... 1960 - Rule 54 - Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - Claiming writ of mandamus - Petitioner is a company purchased various ... At all stages it purported to act under rules 54 and 55 of the Mineral Concession Rules, 1960. ... Concession Rules, 1960.....

Southern Rocks & Minerals Private Limited VS Government of Andhra Pradesh, Industries & Commerce (Mines-II) Department

2021 0 Supreme(AP) 950 India - Andhra Pradesh

U. DURGA PRASAD RAO

), 14, 15 - Granite Conservation and Development Rules, 1999 - Rule 18(2), 19(1), 31(1), 37 and 41 (a) & (b) - APMMC Rules, 1966 ... Constitution of India, 1950 - Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 – Section 2, 3(aa ... - Rule-26 – Illegal mining - Petitioner challenges show cause notice, consequential demand notice and quarry lease determination ... In this regard, it should be noted that the definition of "illegal mining" was given in Rule 2(i....

Exotic Granites Exports VS State of Telangana, Represented by its Secretary, Industries and Commerce (MII) Department

2017 0 Supreme(AP) 14 India - Andhra Pradesh

A.V.SESHA SAI

Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966—Rule 12(5) (b)—General Clauses Act, 1897—Section 21—Quarry lease application—Prior approval ... Mineral Development Corporation cannot be treated specially for consideration on priority basis under 12 (5) (b) of the aid Rules ... Development Corporation is not entitled to claim under Rule 12 (5) (b) of APMMC Rules 1966—Once private participation is invited ... Minor Mineral Concession#H....

Penna Cement Industries Limited VS Union of India

2024 0 Supreme(Telangana) 32 India - Telangana

SUREPALLI NANDA

Mines and Minerals - Writ of Mandamus - Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Amendment Act 2021 ... challenge the refusal of the 3rd respondent to process their mining lease application under Section 10A(2)(b) of the Mines and Minerals ... In this regard inference may be drawn from Rule 33 of the Mining Concession Rules 1960 read with Rule 55 of the Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons Energy Minerals#HL_....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top