AI Overview...
- S. No. 1709 of 2008 - Main Points and Insights
- The case involves an appeal against the judgment dated 19.06.2008 by the Kerala High Court, which upheld an order dated 03.04.2008 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate. The appeal was dismissed despite an interim stay being granted M. P. Peter VS State of Kerala - Supreme Court, M. P. Peter VS State of Kerala - Orissa.
- The High Court's decision affirmed the Magistrate's order, leading to the dismissal of the Criminal Miscellaneous Case M. P. Peter VS State of Kerala - Supreme Court, M. P. Peter VS State of Kerala - Orissa.
- The impugned order relates to criminal proceedings initiated under the jurisdiction of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, and the appeal challenges this order M P PETER vs MR M C JACOB SO CHACKO - Kerala.
- The case also intersects with related legal proceedings, including modifications of tribunal awards and compensation claims, but the core issue remains the validity of the Magistrate's order Chandra Kumar Lama VS National Insurance Company Ltd. - Calcutta.
-
In a separate context, the case touches upon procedural issues such as the timing of departmental promotions and eligibility criteria, emphasizing the importance of crucial dates like 01.01.2008 for filling vacancies Union of India VS Deep Chand Sharma (Retd) - Delhi.
-
Analysis and Conclusion
- The appellate courts upheld the correctness of the Kerala High Court's judgment, confirming that the order passed by the Magistrate was properly affirmed. The appeal did not succeed, and the original order stood M. P. Peter VS State of Kerala - Supreme Court, M. P. Peter VS State of Kerala - Orissa.
- The case underscores the judiciary's stance on the procedural validity of orders passed by subordinate courts and authorities, particularly in criminal and departmental matters.
- The references to related cases involving compensation, departmental promotions, and academic examinations highlight the broader legal principles of timely action, eligibility, and procedural adherence.
- Overall, S. No. 1709 of 2008 reflects the appellate process's role in upholding administrative and judicial orders, with the final disposition favoring the original decision of the High Court and Magistrate Chandra Kumar Lama VS National Insurance Company Ltd. - Calcutta.
References: - M. P. Peter VS State of Kerala - Supreme Court - M. P. Peter VS State of Kerala - Orissa - M P PETER vs MR M C JACOB SO CHACKO - Kerala - Chandra Kumar Lama VS National Insurance Company Ltd. - Calcutta - Union of India VS Deep Chand Sharma (Retd) - Delhi
Search Results for "S a no 1709 of 2008"
2009 0 Supreme(SC) 1058 • India - Supreme Court
S.B.SINHA, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
nbsp;(2004) 1 SCC 438; Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 10997 of 2008 ... This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.06.2008 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Kerala in Criminal M.C. No. 1709 of 2008 whereby and whereunder an order dated 3.04.2008 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate was affirmed. ... No. 1709 of 2008. Though an interim stay was granted, the High Court dismissed the Criminal Miscellaneous Case by reas....
2009 0 Supreme(Ori) 168 • India - Orissa
MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, S.B.SINHA
No. 1709 of 2008. Though an interim stay was granted, the High Court dismissed the Criminal Miscellaneous Case by reason of the impugned judgment dated 19.06.2008. ... 11. Mr. ... This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 19.06.2008 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Kerala in Criminal M.C. No. 1709 of 2008 whereby and whereunder an order dated 3.04.2008 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate was affirmed. ... 3. ... No. 12 o....
2019 0 Supreme(Del) 1878 • India - Delhi
S.MURALIDHAR, TALWANT SINGH
Srinivasan Rao and Others - Article 226 - OA No. 1709/2012 - 2008-09, 2009-10, 2010-11 - 01.01.2008, 01.01.2009, 01.01.2010 - UPSC ... No. 3 in the regular panel who has retired in the panel year 2008-09. ... Therefore, DPC for filling up the vacancies of the year 2008-09 is concerned, the crucial date of determining eligibility has fallen on 01.01.2008 and DPC should have been held prior to that date. ... Ad-hoc promotion orders were issued on 26th September, 2008 an....
2008 Supreme(Online)(KER) 21418 • India - High Court of Kerala
R.BASANT, J
2008 Supreme(Online)(KER) 29623 • India - High Court of Kerala
R.BASANT, J
The impugned order is dated 03/4/2008.
2008 0 Supreme(SC) 392 • India - Supreme Court
S.H.KAPADIA, B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 1084 • India - Calcutta
SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL)
The appeal being FMA 553 of 2014 /FMAT 1709 of 2008 stands disposed of. The impugned judgment and award of the learned Tribunal under appeal is modified to the above extent. 13. No order as to costs. 14. ... (iv) The age of the victim was 30 years and as such multiplier of 18 was applied in 2008. (Sarla Verma (Smt) & Ors. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Anr. (2009) 6 SCC 121). ... The present appeal has been preferred by the claimant being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 15.09.2008 passed by the Judge, Mot....
2008 0 Supreme(Jhk) 500 • India - Jharkhand
AMARESHWAR SAHAY
Another prayer of the petitioner is that she may be allowed to appear in the Botany (Honours) Part-II Examination, which was going to be held on 16.4.2008. ... It also appears even according to the writ petitioner, that Part 11 Examination of Botany (Honours) was to be held from 16.4.2008 and the said date has already passed. In such a situation. it is not possible to accede to the second prayer of the petitioner to allow her to appear in B.Sc. ... Part-I Examination and started searching her answer-book, but the answer-book of the said paper was found to ....
2008 0 Supreme(Raj) 1709 • India - Rajasthan
K.S.RATHORE
2008 0 Supreme(Pat) 1709 • India - Patna
AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI
No purpose would be served by referring the dispute now in the year 2008 to a tribunal, when the writ application was pending for consideration since 1991. ... 9.
Filter by Legal Phrase
