AI Overview...
- Sandesh Patil, Adv. - Main points and insights:
- Represented appellants in land-related disputes, emphasizing that the original claimant purchased land under Section 32G of the BT&AL Act. He argued that respondents Gajanan and others did not participate in the 32G proceedings nor challenge the mutation entry or purchase, implying procedural lapses. Vithu C. Agaskar (Since deceased through Legal heirs) VS Rama Gajanan Agaskar - Bombay
- In another case, he relied on Supreme Court judgments (e.g., Natuhlal Vs.) to argue that respondents should have obtained necessary sanctions themselves, challenging the legality of certain orders. Keshav Tukaram Taware VS Sulochana Shankar Kolekar - Bombay
- As an intervenor, he opposed the appointments of petitioners as backdoor entries, asserting intervenors' locus and criticizing procedural omissions. He also referenced relevant case law (e.g., Asha Shamkumar Patil Vs.) to support his stance. Gitanjali, d/o. Prakash Patil VS State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, School Education and Sports Department - Bombay
- In election-related matters, he contended that changes to voters' lists post-election are impermissible, arguing the impugned order was unlawful. Kalyankumar S. Shettar VS State of Co-operative Election Commission - Karnataka
- Defended orders regarding suppression of certification (e.g., M.E. No. 946), asserting that the petitioner’s conduct justified dismissing the petition. Gopal Bemtya Thakare VS Sitaram Babu Thakare - Bombay
- In other instances, he represented authorities or individuals (e.g., regarding inquiries, investigations, or administrative actions), emphasizing procedural correctness and legality of orders. PRAKASH HAMIRMAL JAIN vs RAMCHANDRA GAJANAN PATIL - Supreme Court, State of Maharashtra through Additional Chief Secretary Home Department, Mantralaya VS Central Bureau of Investigation - Bombay
- Analysis and Conclusion:
- Sandesh Patil appears as a versatile advocate involved in land disputes, administrative law, and election matters, consistently emphasizing procedural legality, proper participation in proceedings, and adherence to statutory requirements.
- His arguments often focus on procedural lapses by opposing parties, the importance of compliance with legal provisions (e.g., Section 32G, sanctions), and the legality of administrative actions.
- His references to Supreme Court judgments and case law reinforce his legal reasoning, aiming to uphold procedural fairness and legality.
- Overall, Adv. Sandesh Patil's role is that of a diligent advocate defending clients' procedural rights and challenging irregularities in land, administrative, and election law contexts.
Search Results for "Sandesh Patil Adv"
2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 816 • India - Bombay
ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
Shri Sandesh Patil, the learned Counsel for the appellants has submitted that the original claimant Vithu had purchased the land under Section 32G of the BT&AL Act. ... On the contrary, his own witness PW2 Chandrarao Patil has admitted in his cross-examination that Changa was in possession of the land under survey no.26/9 as a tenant. ... 14. ... Counsel Shri Patil further contends that neither Gajanan nor the respondents had participated in 32G proceedings. They had not challenged the mutation entry and or the purchase ....
2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 2267 • India - Bombay
K.K.TATED, SARANG V.KOTWAL
Sandesh D. Patil, learned Counsel for the Appellant and Mr. Kashyap Bhalerao, learned Counsel for the Respondents. After hearing both the sides and going through the record and proceedings and carefully considering the impugned Judgment, the following points arise for our consideration. ... Patil relied on the Judgment of the Hon''ble Supreme Court in the case of Natuhlal Vs. ... Patil, the sanction, if it was required, should have been obtained by the Respondents themselves. 10. As against these submissions, Mr. ... #H....
• India - Bombay
MANGESH S. PATIL, SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Sandesh R. Patil, who appears for the intervenors, adopts the submissions of learned AGP. He would vehemently submit that the appointments of the petitioners are backdoor entries. He would further submit that intervenors are deliberately not impleaded in the matters, though they are having locus. ... c) 2007 (6) Bom.C.R. 402, (Asha Shamkumar Patil Vs. Sadhana Rajan Kamble & Ors) Supreme Court. ... In the case of petitioner Pankaj, Avinash Pawar (OBC), Dinesh Pawar (OBC) and Vishwas Patil (OBC) had appeared for interview....
2015 0 Supreme(Kar) 1008 • India - Karnataka
RAVI V.MALIMATH
Patil, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner's counsel submits that the impugned order is bad in law and liable to be set aside. The change in the voters list is not permissible. It is only on the date of election that such a change is made. Various other grounds are also pleaded.
2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 955 • India - Bombay
M.S.SONAK
Patil, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. ... Patil, learned counsel for respondent defends the impugned order on the reasoning reflected therein. He points out that in this case certification of the relevant M.E. No. 946 was in fact suppressed by the petitioner. For these reasons, Mr. Patil submits that this petition may be dismissed.
• India - Supreme Court of India
Sandesh Patil, Adv. Mr. Gaurav Agrawal,Adv. ... Sunil Upadhyay, Adv. ... Adv. Mr. Uday U. Lalit, Sr. Adv. ... Adv. Mr. Sudhanshu S.Choudhari,Adv. ... Shankar Narayanan, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Adv.
2021 0 Supreme(Bom) 284 • India - Bombay
S.S.SHINDE, N.J.JAMADAR
Patil and the letter of Mr. Param Bir Singh. 24. Mr. ... 9 …………...While ACP Patil and DCP Bhujbal were made to wait outside the Hon’ble Home Minister’s cabin, Mr. ... I was informed by ACP Patil about the demand to make collections for the Hon’ble Home Minister. ………………. 11. ... Patil should be directed to be taken. The Division Bench thereafter went on to consider the justifiability of directing inquiry/investigation on the basis of the complaint of Dr. Patil. In paragraph 55, the Division Bench posed ....
• India - Bombay High Court - Bench at Aurangabad
• India - Bombay High Court - Bench at Aurangabad
• India - Bombay High Court - Bench at Aurangabad
Filter by Legal Phrase
