AI Overview...

SLP No. 1866 of 2024 - Main points and insights:
The case involves an appeal filed under the Supreme Court's special leave jurisdiction, with references to earlier judgments and proceedings Mahnoor Fatima Imran VS Visweswara Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd - Supreme Court.
The appeal was against a judgment that was considered insufficient, with references to the procedural aspects and the role of senior counsel representing the state of Telangana and petitioners Mahnoor Fatima Imran VS Visweswara Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd - Supreme Court.
The case also discusses the application of the Letters Patent Act, 1866, particularly Clause X, concerning appeals against refusal to grant possession of a shop, and the Court’s consideration of the appellant’s conduct and merit of the appeal Jagdish Yadav vs New Delhi Municipal Council - Delhi.
The Supreme Court has reviewed procedural procedures, including those related to the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, in a three-judge bench order dated 16.11.2021, with hearings held in December 2024 P. C Hary, S/o Late Parameswaran Namboodirippad VS Guruvayoor Devaswom Managing Committee - Kerala, P.C HARY vs GURUVAYOOR DEVASWOM MANAGING COMMITTEE - Kerala.
The judgment from March 2025 (No. 1866 of 2023) clarified that objections under specific orders are to be considered, and the doctrine of merger applies when SLPs are dismissed Sugra Beguam VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh.
The dismissal of certain Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) was based on prior orders, such as the order dated 19.7.2004 in SLP (C) No. 3022/2004, indicating adherence to procedural doctrines like merger and finality of orders Natthan Singh VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, Natthan Singh Vs. State Of U.P. And Others - Allahabad.
Analysis and Conclusion:
The case reflects the Supreme Court’s consistent approach to procedural correctness, the application of the Letters Patent Act, and the doctrine of merger in the context of appeals and SLPs.
The Court emphasizes the importance of procedural adherence, proper representation, and the finality of orders in appellate proceedings.
The references to Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams and other judgments highlight the Court’s detailed scrutiny of procedural norms in specific cases.
Overall, the judgment consolidates principles related to appellate jurisdiction, procedural integrity, and the finality of orders under the Indian Supreme Court framework.

Search Results for "Slp C no 1866 2024"

Mahnoor Fatima Imran VS Visweswara Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd

2025 5 Supreme 1 • India - Supreme Court

SUDHANSHU DHULIA, K. VINOD CHANDRAN

We refer to the documents from the memorandum of appeal in SLP (C) No. 1866 of 2024. ... Niranjan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appeared for the State of Telangana and the petitioners in SLP (C) Diary No.19071 of 2024 ... A Division Bench rejected the appeal against which a SLP was filed in N.

Jagdish Yadav vs New Delhi Municipal Council

2025 0 Supreme(Del) 4 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

(A) Letters Patent Act, 1866 - Clause X - Appeal against refusal to grant possession of shop - Appellant claimed to be successful ... Present appeal has been filed under Clause X of the Letters Patent Act, 1866 assailing the impugned judgement dated 19.11.2024 passed ... itself was insufficient in the context of the brave and valiant act of the appellant therein, the Supreme Court considered the SLP ... (C) 9410/....

P. C Hary, S/o Late Parameswaran Namboodirippad VS Guruvayoor Devaswom Managing Committee

2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 1297 • India - Kerala

Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams [Order dated 16.11.2021 in SLP(C)No.6554 of 2021] a Three-Judge Bench of the Apex Court was dealing ... Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams [Order dated 16.11.2021 in SLP(C)No.6554 of 2021], wherein it was held that the procedure of conducting ... Heard detailed arguments on 03.12.2024, 04.12.2024 and 05.12.2024.

2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 1281 • India - Punjab and Haryana

PANKAJ JAIN

Union of India, Civil Appeal No.8605 of 2024 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.32962 of 2018) observing as under : p align="justify ... Fletcher, 1866 LRI Ex 265. xxxx 55.

Munder Vs. Deputy Director Of Consolidation And Ohters

2024 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 857 • India - High Court of Allahabad (Lucknow Bench)

Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

Order Date :- 23.5.2024 DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench/ul ... reliance upon the judgments quoted below:- (1) Suraj Lamp & Industries Pvt Ltd versus State of Haryana and another, SLP ... district in which, and if they have been executed on or after the date on which, Act XVI of 1864, or the Indian Registration Act, 1866

P.C HARY vs GURUVAYOOR DEVASWOM MANAGING COMMITTEE

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 56341 • India - High Court of Kerala

ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ

Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams [Order dated 16.11.2021 in SLP(C)No.6554 of 2021] a Three-Judge Bench of the Apex Court ... Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams [Order dated 16.11.2021 in SLP(C)No.6554 of 2021], wherein it was held that the procedure of conducting ... Heard detailed arguments on 03.12.2024, 04.12.2024 and 05.12.2024.

2025 0 Supreme(MP) 474 • India - Madhya Pradesh

SANJAY DWIVEDI

No. 1866 of 2023 decided on 21.3.2025 and 2022 SCC Online SC 1962 referred to. [Paras 20 to 27] ... 383] 2022 ,llhlh vkWuykbu ,llh 1330] ¼1998½ 3 ,llhlh 573] f}rh; vihy Øekad 525 lu~ 2015 fu.kÊr fnukad 3-10-2015] çFke vihy Øekad 1866 ... No.1866 of 2023) decided vide judgment dated 21.3.2025, the Court has decided the issue that if an objection is raised under Order ... This civil revision is filed under section 115 r/w section 151 of the ....

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 36114 • India - High Court of Kerala

ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ

Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams [Order dated 16.11.2021 in SLP(C)No.6554 of 2021] a Three-Judge Bench ... Heard detailed arguments on 03.12.2024, 04.12.2024 and 05.12.2024. ... Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams [Order dated 16.11.2021 in SLP(C)No.6554 of 2021], wherein it was held that the procedure of conducting

2024 0 Supreme(All) 2105 • India - Allahabad

KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA

The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed in view of order dated 19.7.2004 passed in SLP (C) No. 3022/2004 ... Virendra Bahadur Katheria and others, 2024 (3) SLJ 1, where doctrine of merger, in a case where special leave petition was dismissed ... addressed to him at his last known residence, address or place of business and registered under Part III of the Indian Post Office Act, 1866

Natthan Singh Vs. State Of U.P. And Others

2024 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 2724 • India - High Court of Allahabad

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed in view of order dated 19.07.2004 passed in SLP ... Virendra Bahadur Katheria and others, 2024 (3) SLJ 1, where doctrine of merger, in a case where special leave petition was dismissed ... addressed to him at his last known residence, address or place of business and registered under Part III of the Indian Post Office Act, 1866

Filter by Legal Phrase

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

No Condonation Application Needed for Timely Criminal Revisions Relief Under Section 69 MRTP Act: Key Guide No Strike Off Pleadings in Consumer Protection Act 2019 Latest Polygraph Tests Developments in Indian Law Section 356 BNSS: Procedure & CrPC Comparison No TIP? Police Disclosure Weakens Court Identification Section 356 BNSS: Defamation Procedure Explained Can Gaon Bura Decide Other Village Cases? AFR 1945 Rules Prima Facie Case for Injunction in Will Declaration Suit Compounding Offences: After Judgment, Before Sentence? Magistrate Oath Exam in Section 138 NI Act Cases Court Notice Returned Unclaimed: Valid Service? Is Order Allowing Pleading Amendment Revisable Under CPC? Railways Act 1989: Confessional Statements Provision? Can New Counsel File Review Petition? Legal Rules