Definition and Nature:
Spec successionis refers to a mere chance or expectation of inheritance, not a vested right. It is often described as a mere chance of succession within the meaning of the Transfer of Property Act, making it non-transferrable and legally null if transferred Gopalakrishna (D) By Lrs VS Narayanagowda (Dead) By Lrs. - Supreme Court, Kondapalli Parasuramareddi And VS Malereddi Venkayya, - Madras, MAHESHCHANDRA SHIVANAND SINGH VS DHANPAL UMEDCHAND PATNI - Madhya Pradesh.
Legal Status and Transferability:
Transfers, mortgages, or relinquishments of spec successionis are generally invalid and considered nullities because they represent a mere hope or expectancy, not an actual estate or vested interest Gopalakrishna (D) By Lrs VS Narayanagowda (Dead) By Lrs. - Supreme Court, MAHESHCHANDRA SHIVANAND SINGH VS DHANPAL UMEDCHAND PATNI - Madhya Pradesh.
Rights of Heirs and Customary Rights:
Under certain customary laws (e.g., Punjab agricultural custom), sons and other heirs may only hold a spec successionis, which can be protected from unnecessary alienations by the father or other ancestors Baj Singh VS Tilok Singh - Punjab and Haryana, LEELAVATHI vs CHELLASWAMY - Madras.
Effect of Vesting and Enforcement:
Once the spec successionis vests in the heir (i.e., the right becomes actual and not just a chance), the right can be enforced, and the principle of estoppel may prevent the heir from denying their interest after it has vested Leelavathi VS Chellaswami - Madras, SELVI vs PERIYA RAMATHAL (DECEASED) - Madras.
Surrender and Renunciation:
Unlike spec successionis, the right of survivorship (a different concept) can be renounced or surrendered, but spec successionis cannot be relinquished or sold BHAIYA RAMANUJ PRATAP DEO vs LALU MAHESHANUJ PRATAP DEO & ORS. AND VICE VERSA - Supreme Court.
Case Law and Judicial Views:
The Judicial Committee has held that contingent interests like spec successionis cannot be validly sold, as they are mere chances, and agreements to sell such interests are void MAHESHCHANDRA SHIVANAND SINGH VS DHANPAL UMEDCHAND PATNI - Madhya Pradesh.
The case of Gulam Abbas emphasizes that rights based solely on spec successionis are barred from enforcement once they vest, due to principles of estoppel SELVI vs PERIYA RAMATHAL (DECEASED) - Madras.
Spec successionis represents a non-vested, uncertain interest in property, often arising in inheritance contexts under customary laws or statutory provisions. Its essential characteristic is that it is a mere hope or expectation, not a legally enforceable right, and cannot be transferred, mortgaged, or relinquished. Once the interest vests, it becomes enforceable, and the original nature as spec successionis no longer applies. The legal framework emphasizes the importance of actual vested rights over mere chances of succession, aligning with principles of law that prevent the transfer of non-vested, uncertain interests.
References:
- Gopalakrishna (D) By Lrs VS Narayanagowda (Dead) By Lrs. - Supreme Court, Kondapalli Parasuramareddi And VS Malereddi Venkayya, - Madras, Baj Singh VS Tilok Singh - Punjab and Haryana, Leelavathi VS Chellaswami - Madras, LEELAVATHI vs CHELLASWAMY - Madras, SELVI vs PERIYA RAMATHAL (DECEASED) - Madras, Gopi Nath VS Rup Ram - Allahabad, BHAIYA RAMANUJ PRATAP DEO vs LALU MAHESHANUJ PRATAP DEO & ORS. AND VICE VERSA - Supreme Court, MAHESHCHANDRA SHIVANAND SINGH VS DHANPAL UMEDCHAND PATNI - Madhya Pradesh
The equity is stringent against the consenting party because the consent to a transaction by a widow at a time when the reversioner has only a spec successionis is sought to be used against him after, the property has vested in him.
A son governed by Punjab agricultural custom has only a spes successionis in the property held by the father. 4. ... Under Punjab custom, the sons have only a spec successionis in the property held by the father, and to protect such a right they can prevent unnecessary alienations of the ancestral property by the father.
have any right until succession to estate is opened up – When grand-father of appellants was alive, his son had at best a spes successionis ... his father from second marriage – Father of plaintiffs was only a heir apparent – Transfer by an heir apparent being mere spes successionis ... He himself had only, what is described a spec successionis within the meaning of Section 6(a) of the Transfer of Property Act. ... He points out that in 1975 when the Release Deed was executed, Shri Chandran, the father of the appellant, ....
She only had right of spec successionis in respect of half share of her father. In respect of other half share belonged to respondent, she not even had chance of succession or spec successionis. ... Therefore, certainly, the consideration received by the appellant in the year 1982 would not be in contemplation of giving up her spec successionis in respect of half share, but it was only in contemplation of giving up her spec successionis in respect of....
She only had right of spec successionis in respect of half share of her father. In respect of other half share belonged to respondent, she not even had chance of succession or spec successionis. ... of giving up her spec successionis in respect of 1/4th share. ... of spec successionis or a chance to succeed for a consideration would amount to estoppel. ... (MD) No.325 of 2011 concerned, the appellant not even had chance of ....
(MD).No.109 of 2015 surrenders of their spes successionis. ... As far as the half share of the respondent is concerned, the appellant not even had chance of succession or spec successionis.” 17. ... successionis is barred from enforcing his right after it get vested in him in view of rule of estoppel. ... If the principle in Gulam Abbas (supra) applies, then, despite the fact that what was purported to be released by Shri Chandran, was a mere spec successonis or expect....
The plea of a transfer of a mere spec successionis is based on the fact that the property hypothecated originally belonged to Bal Kishen who died leaving a widow Mt. Muthra Dei and two daughters. These daughters had one son each, one of whom was Sambhu Nath, the mortgagor. ... It is therefore quite clear this was not a transfer of a mere spes successionis. The learned advocate for the appellant has argued that, qua the interest which Shambhu Nath acquired after the death of Mt. Muthra Dei, the hypothecation was that of a mere chance of su....
successionis. ... Unlike spec successionis the right of survivorship can be renounced or surrendered. [433 G-H, 434 A-B] Rajah Velugoti Kumara Krishna Yachendra Varu and Ors. v. ... Unlike spes successionis, the right of survivorship can be renounced or surrendered. ... The right of survivorship which can be claimed by the members of the undivided family which owns the impartible estate should not be confused with a mere spes successionis....
Therein, repelling a similar contention, the Judicial Committee observed: it was argued that Annagoudas contingent interest as a remote reversioner could not be validly sold by him, as it was a mere spec successionis, and an agreement to sell such interest would also be void in law.
It is a spes successionis or a mere chance of succession within the meaning of Section 6, Transfer of Property Act, 1882. It cannot, therefore, be sold, mortgaged or assigned, nor can it be relinquished. A transfer of a spes successionis is a nullity, and it has no effect in law. ... She fully represents the estate, the interest of the reversioners therein being only spec successiones. The widow is entitled to the full beneficial enjoyment of the estate and is not accountable to any one. ... The right of reversionary hei....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.