AI Overview...
- Supreme Court Decisions on Evidence and Interpretation
- The Supreme Court has emphasized the importance of circumstantial evidence, requiring the court to be firmly satisfied before recording a conviction (e.g., Mahmood v. State of Uttar Pradesh, ILR 1976 Kay 417 SC).
- The Court has also clarified principles of statutory interpretation, including the application of ejusdem generis, as seen in decisions like Smt. Lila Vati Bai v. State and Munna Lal v. Suraj Bhan.
-
In cases involving interpretation of terms like includes, the Court has accepted broad interpretations to enlarge meaning, exemplified in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Taj Mahal Hotel (1972).
-
Judicial Principles and Legal Procedures
- The Court has addressed procedural issues such as extension of time under the Civil Procedure Code, establishing settled principles through cases like Hajara Umma v. Kunhikrishnan and Kallyani Amma v. Kunhikrishnan.
-
In matters of administrative and revenue orders, the Supreme Court has quashed and remanded decisions, as in the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal case (1976), highlighting the Court’s role in ensuring proper legal procedures.
-
Specific Case Examples
- The Court has dealt with issues of adulteration in food samples, confirming findings of adulteration due to foreign matter, as in the case where a sample was found to contain artificial dye (Rajaldas G. Pamnani).
-
The Court has also addressed legal interpretations related to commodities, such as cotton seeds, and clarified the scope of terms like includes in statutory contexts (Punjab v. Commissioner of Income Tax).
-
Constitutional and Fundamental Rights
-
The Court has discussed the application of Article 359 concerning the paramount law of the country and the rights of citizens to approach the Supreme Court directly under Article 32 for illegal detention, emphasizing the supremacy of constitutional provisions (Gopalan’s case).
-
Regulatory and Administrative Orders
- The Court has examined regulatory orders, such as the deletion of certain items from schedules, and their impact on dealer obligations, underscoring the Court’s review of administrative actions (G.S.R. 6, 1976).
Analysis and Conclusion:
The Supreme Court’s jurisprudence from 1976 reflects a focus on ensuring fair judicial procedures, clarifying principles of evidence and interpretation, and safeguarding constitutional rights. The Court’s decisions serve to uphold the rule of law by scrutinizing administrative orders, interpreting statutes broadly when appropriate, and emphasizing the need for firm satisfaction in circumstantial evidence cases. These principles continue to underpin Indian jurisprudence, ensuring justice is administered within a well-defined legal framework.
Search Results for "Supreme Sc 1976 0 199"
1976 0 Supreme(Raj) 199 • India - Rajasthan
S.N.MODI
It has been laid down by their Lordships of the Supreme Court in Bungo Steel Furniture (Pvt) Ltd. v. ... In this connection, I am supported in my view by another decision of the Supreme Court in Jivrajbhai Ujamshi Seth and others v. Chintemarrao Balaji and others, AIR 1965 SC 214 . ... 9.
1976 0 Supreme(Kar) 199 • India - Karnataka
K.J.SHETTY, HONNAIH
As observed by the Supreme Court in Eradu v. ... In a recent case, Sarkaria, J. speaking for the supreme Court in Mahmood v. ... Crla 398 of 1976 ... ( 4 ) PW18 examined Giriyappa (PW6) Ramappa (PW7) and Annappa (PW8) and one Chandrasekhar. ... State of Uttar Pradesh (ILR 1976 Kay 417 SC), elaborated the the above principles thus : "in a case dependent wholly on circumstantial evidence the court before recording a conviction on the basis therefore must be firmly satisfied.
1976 0 Supreme(Bom) 199 • India - Bombay
C.S.DHARMADHIKARI
The order passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal dated 23rd April 1976 was quashed and set aside and the matter was remanded ... In this context a reference could usefully be made to the decision of the Supreme Court in Sheikh Gulfan v. ... As to when and how the rule of ejusdem generis can apply is also well settled, In this context a, reference could be made to the decision of the Supreme Court in Smt. Lila Vati Bai v. ... As observed by the Supreme Court in Munna Lal v. Suraj Bhan and others16 and in Deo Chand v. ....
1976 0 Supreme(Ker) 199 • India - Kerala
P.JANAKI AMMA
Extension of Time - Civil Procedure - C.M.A. 41 of 1976 - S.148 of the Code of Civil Procedure - Mahanth Rama Das v. ... The law on the point is practically settled by the various decisions of this Court as also the Supreme Court. Similar questions arose for consideration in the decisions in Hajara Umma v. Kunhikrishnan (1969 KLT. 800) and Kallyani Amma v. Kunhikrishnan (1971 KLT. 309). ... The court passed the following order: ... "Costs of Rs. 30/-paid to Advocate for respondents 1, 2, 3 and 5 by memo dated 317 1976 and costs of Rs. 30/....
1976 0 Supreme(Del) 199 • India - Delhi
V.D.MISRA
... ( 7 ) IN view of the judgment of the Supreme Court reported in Rajaldas G. Pamnani v. ... The Public Analyst found the sample to be adulterated because of the presence of artificial coal-tar dye and 10. 0% foreign matter of starches.
1976 0 Supreme(AP) 199 • India - Andhra Pradesh
B.J.DIVAN, CHENNAKESAVA REDDY
It may be pointed out that this question regarding cotton and cotton seeds has subsequently been considered by the Supreme Court in Start of Punjab v. ... The same interpretation of the word includes was accepted by the Supreme court in the Commissioner of Income Tax A. P. V. Taj Mahal Hotel (8) a. T. R. 1972 S. ... C. 168 In paragraph 6 at page 170 Grover J speaking for the supreme Court has observed:"the word includes is often used in interpretation clauses in order to enlarge the meaning of the words or phrases occurring in the bod....
1976 0 Supreme(SC) 199 • India - Supreme Court
A.N.RAY, H.R.KHANNA, M.H.BEG, P.N.BHAGWATI, Y.V.CHANDRACHUD
Ltd. ((1915) AC 750 : 84 LJPC 152) in an appeal from the Supreme Court of Canada. ... The principle in Eshugbayi Eleko's case will not apply where Article 359 is the paramount and supreme law of the country. ... Gopalan's case at pp. 112, 199, 276, 277, 288, 307, 308, 309, 321, 322.) ... There would be no point in preventing a citizen from moving the Supreme Court directly under Article 32 for securing his release from illegal detention, while at the same time leaving it open to him to move the High Court for the same re....
1976 0 Supreme(MP) 199 • India - Madhya Pradesh
K.K.DUBE
1976 0 Supreme(Cal) 199 • India - Calcutta
N.C.Mukherji, B.C.Ray
1976 0 Supreme(Pat) 199 • India - Patna
UDAY SINHA, SHIVANUGRAH NARAIN
Speaking for the Supreme Court in (4) N.I. Caterers Ltd. V. ... Bipen Kumar (A.I.R. 1970 S.C. 786) Bhargava, J. speaking for the Supreme Court pointed out that: ... “.... ... G.S.R. 6, dated the 20th February, 1976, dry battery cells of torches etc were deleted from schedule I of the said ORDER :with the result that after February, 1976, the dealer was not required to display the prices and stocks of dry battery cells of torches etc. ... ... This is an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution for quash....
Filter by Legal Phrase
