AI Overview...
-
Time City Infrastructure and Housing Limited Lucknow (TCIHL) - The company is involved in legal cases concerning infrastructure and housing projects in Lucknow and other jurisdictions. Notably, in 2025, the Supreme Court and High Court of Allahabad examined issues related to agreements, performance timelines, and legal procedures involving TCIHL Time City Infrastructure And Housing Limited Lucknow VS State of U. P. - Supreme Court, SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH AND ANR vs SIQUE WEN - Calcutta, DHALITHA VIVIDHA GRAMODYOGA KAIGARIKA SAHAKARA SANGA NIYAMITHA (R) vs SAMATHA SAINIKA DAL SSD - Karnataka.
-
Legal Proceedings and Judgments - The courts have referenced TCIHL in cases involving contractual obligations, specifically regarding the execution of sale deeds within stipulated timelines, and have emphasized adherence to judicial precedents such as the Supreme Court judgments in Shiv Kumar Chadha v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi (1993) 3 SCC 161 and Time City Infrastructure and Housing Limited Lucknow v. State of U.P. (2025 SCC Online SC 1674). These cases highlight the importance of proper judicial procedures, timely disposal of applications under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, and adherence to Supreme Court directives RAMACHANDRA R vs K H PARVATHI DEVI - Karnataka, SRI. D MANUEL vs SRI. VARGHESE PAUL PALAMATTAM - Karnataka, SMT. DRAKSHAYINI. R vs SRI. B. R. ASHWATHNARAYANAPPA - Karnataka.
-
Court Orders and Directions - The courts have issued directions to trial courts to follow Supreme Court judgments strictly and have refused to issue notices to respondents when prayers are limited to procedural directions. The courts have also underscored the necessity for courts to consider relevant judgments in similar cases involving TCIHL and to ensure procedural compliance SMT. PREMA G T vs SMT.HONNAMMA - Karnataka, SMT. JAYANTHI vs SRI. K. PRASAD - Karnataka.
-
Main Points & Insights:
- TCIHL's legal cases often involve contractual disputes, particularly related to sale deed execution and project timelines.
- Judicial authorities emphasize compliance with Supreme Court rulings, especially in cases of injunctions and procedural applications.
-
Courts have directed lower courts to adhere to established legal precedents, ensuring consistency and proper judicial process.
-
Analysis and Conclusion:
- TCIHL remains a significant entity in infrastructure and housing sectors in Lucknow, frequently appearing in legal proceedings that stress the importance of timely project execution and adherence to legal standards.
- Judicial decisions reflect a consistent approach of referencing Supreme Court rulings to guide procedural and substantive aspects of cases involving TCIHL.
- Overall, the legal landscape for TCIHL in Lucknow is shaped by a focus on procedural diligence, contractual clarity, and compliance with higher court directives, ensuring accountability in infrastructure and housing projects.
References: - Time City Infrastructure And Housing Limited Lucknow VS State of U. P. - Supreme Court - SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH AND ANR vs SIQUE WEN - Calcutta - DHALITHA VIVIDHA GRAMODYOGA KAIGARIKA SAHAKARA SANGA NIYAMITHA (R) vs SAMATHA SAINIKA DAL SSD - Karnataka - DR. M C SUDHAKAR vs SRI. VEERENDARA BABU N - Karnataka - RAMACHANDRA R vs K H PARVATHI DEVI - Karnataka - SRI. D MANUEL vs SRI. VARGHESE PAUL PALAMATTAM - Karnataka - SMT. DRAKSHAYINI. R vs SRI. B. R. ASHWATHNARAYANAPPA - Karnataka - SMT. PREMA G T vs SMT.HONNAMMA - Karnataka - SMT. JAYANTHI vs SRI. K. PRASAD - Karnataka
Search Results for "Time City Infrastructure and Housing Limited Lucknow"
2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1189 • India - Supreme Court
J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
This petition arises from the order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Bench Lucknow) dated 24-7-2025 in Writ- C No.6701/2025 by which the petition filed by the respondents – herein (original defendants) came to be allowed thereby set asiding the order passed by the Civil Judge (Senior ... The time of performance in the agreement was one year with a provision that in case the sale deed is not executed within a period of one year, the same can be executed through Court.
2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 6992 • India - Calcutta High Court
In support of such contention, he relies upon 2025 INSC 966 (Time City Infrastructure and Housing Limited Lucknow vs. The State of U.P. & Ors.) ... 10.Consequently, the ratio laid down in Time City Infrastructure and Housing Limited Lucknow (supra) as well as Saroj Saha & Ors.
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 125819 • India - THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
Municipal Corporation of Delhi and others reported in (1993)3 SCC 161, Time City Infrastructure and Housing Limited Lucknow vs. ... Municipal Corporation of Delhi and others reported in (1993)3 SCC 161, Time City Infrastructure and Housing Limited Lucknow vs. ... No.1 filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 on its merits by assigning reasons, within a time frame ....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 347819 • India - THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
Municipal Corporation of Delhi and others reported in (1993)3 SCC 161, Time City Infrastructure and Housing Limited Lucknow vs. ... Municipal Corporation of Delhi and others reported in (1993)3 SCC 161, Time City Infrastructure and Housing Limited Lucknow vs. ... and 2 of CPC while he requested and insisted the Court to pass an ad interim ex parte order of temporary injunction pr....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37534 • India - THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
In the case of Time City infrastructure and Housing Limited Lucknow V/s State of U.P. and others reported in 2025 SCC Online SC 1674, the Hon'ble Supreme Court held at paragraph 5 as under: 5. ... It would be relevant to cite the judgments of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Shiv Kumar Chadha -vs- Municipal Corporation of Delhi and others reported in (1993) 3 SCC 161 and in the case of Time City Infrastructure and Ho....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 198766 • India - THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
City infrastructure and Housing Limited Lucknow V/s State of U.P. and others reported in 2025 SCC Online SC 1674, the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Vedant Fashions Pvt. ... relevant to note that while deciding the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, the trial Court would have to consider the judgments of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the cases of Shiv Kumar Chadha v/s Municipal Corporation of Delhi and others reported in (1993) 3 SCC 161, Time
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37609 • India - THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
The trial Court shall adhere to the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Shiv Kumar Chadha -vs- Municipal Corporation of Delhi and others reported in (1993) 3 SCC 161 and in the case of Time City Infrastructure and Housing Limited Lucknow V/s State of ... This Court does not find the need or necessity to issue notice to respondents/defendants for the reason that the prayer sought is limited to the extent of issuance of direction to the trial Court to dis....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37664 • India - THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
Therefore, in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the cases of Shiv Kumar Chadha V/s Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others reported in (1993) 3 Supreme Court Cases 161, and Time City Infrastructure and Housing Limited Lucknow V/s State ... BHAIRANNA., AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.2 TO 5 R/A NO. 45, 2ND CROSS ROAD, BEHIND MORISON LIMITED, BUDHADHA JYOTHI LAYOUT, CHIKKABIDARAKALLU, RAMANAGARA - 560 073. 6. SRI. ... If the defendants are served an....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 281819 • India - THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
Municipal Corporation of Delhi and others reported in (1993)3 SCC 161, Time City Infrastructure and Housing Limited Lucknow vs. ... M/S.KNS SPACES LLP LLP REGISTERED UNDER THE LIMITED LIABILITY OF PARTNERSHIP ACT, 2008 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.1125/12, 1ST FLOOR SERVICE ROAD, HAMPINAGAR VIJAYNAGAR 2ND STAGE BENGALURU-560 104 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY MR.PAVAN KUMAR H.N ... VISTRA ITCL (INDIA) LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER....
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 36786 • India - THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
It would be relevant to cite the judgments of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Shiv Kumar Chadha -vs- Municipal Corporation of Delhi and others reported in (1993) 3 SCC 161 and in the case of Time City Infrastructure and Housing Limited Lucknow V/s State of ... CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE BANGALORE ON IA NO. 1 AND 2 VIDE ANNEXURE-L. DIRECTION OR ORDER TO ALLOW THE IA NO. 1 AND 2 IN O.S.NO. 7635/2025 ON THE FILE OF HONBLE XIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL ....
Filter by Legal Phrase
