Specific case details indicate that A-1 directed A-10 to transfer substantial amounts (Rs. 25 lakhs and Rs. 10 lakhs) from Tiger’s account to other accounts (Irani’s and Ohalia’s), and these transfers were executed accordingly. The directives were given verbally, and the transfers involved contact with third parties (e.g., Choksi). The case emphasizes the procedural adherence and the authority of the directing officer in the transfer process. YAKUB ABDUL RAZAK MEMON vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TH:CBI MUMBAI - Supreme Court
Analysis and Conclusion:
Court has merely found out the via media, where considering the facts and circumstances of a particular case, by way of which it ... of the President of India or the Governor of the State, as the case may be. ... To balance the two is the primary duty of the court. ... It was A-1 who directed A-10 to transfer rupees 25 lakhs from Tiger’s account to Irani’s account and also to transfer Rs. 10 lakhs to Ohalia’s account which was duly done by A-10. ... ... 6) On 9th March, he directed th....
It was A-1 who directed A-10 to transfer rupees 25 lakhs from Tiger’s account to Irani’s account and also to transfer Rs. 10 lakhs to Ohalia’s account which was duly done by A- 10. ... 6) On 9th March, he directed the confessing accused to transfer Rs. 25 lakhs by transferring the same from Tiger’s account to Irani’s account and transfer Rs. 10 lakhs to the Ohalia’s account which was done by the accused by contacting Choksi (A-97) on phone. ... Section 18 also makes it clear that after taking congnizance of any offence....
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.