1. Management of Palani Agricultural Products Co-operative Marketing Society Limited, Rep. by its Special Officer VS Deputy Commissioner of Labour, (Appellate Authority under the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishment Act), Dindigul - 13 Aug 21

Point of law : Contractual appointment - If the workman is retrenched by an oral order or communication or he is simply asked not to come for duty, the employer will be required to lead tangible and substantive evidence to prove compliance with clauses (a) and (b) of Section 25-F of the Act

of India, however, decision in Uma Devi case will be of no assistance if there is a State enactment dealing on the subject – Court ... mentioned in Uma Devi case is only for the High Court and Supreme Court in granting direction under Articles 226 and 32 of Constitution ... In our considered view, said submission cannot be sustained, for, in dealing with Uma Devi case, Hon’ble Apex Court held that prohibition ... Devi case, the Hon’ble Apex Court held that the prohibition mentioned in Uma Devi case is only for the High Court and the Supreme ... Uma Devi [2006 (4) SCC 1], as he was not appointed through the employment exchange. ... Again, referring to the Constitution Bench judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Uma Devi (cited supra), it was argued that there

India - Madras

2. Bali Prasad Sahu VS State Of Jharkhand - 26 Feb 08

Accordingly, the State Government is directed to ensure that the process in terms of the judgment of Uma

India - Jharkhand

3. DIWAKAR PRASAD PUROHIT VS RAGHAV LANGAR - 18 Mar 15

Devi (supra) shall not be treated as precedent — Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Uma Devi (supra) nowhere says that earlier judgments ... demonstrates that Hon’ble Apex Court has held that all earlier decisions contrary to the decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Uma ... Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Uma Devi (Supra) nowhere says that earlier judgments stand ... Devi (Supra) shall not be treated as precedent. ... demonstrate that Hon’ble Apex Court has held that all earlier decisions contrary to the decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Uma

India - Uttarakhand

4. State of Jharkhand VS Ram Pravesh Kumar - 01 Aug 14

Devi. ... authority—State Government directed to consider case of petitioner afresh keeping in view law laid down by Supreme Court in case of Uma ... Uma Devi (3) and Ors, reported in (2006)4 SCC 1, had dismissed the appeal. ... Uma Devi(3) (Supra) the Hon’ble Supreme Court had dismissed the Civil Appeal of other similarly situated employees.

India - Jharkhand

5. State of M. P. VS Ramgarib - 17 Jul 97

P – 6 is the earliest version about the incident, and was given at the police station by Uma Devi herself. ... P – 6 lodged by the deceased Uma Devi was doubtful. ... 2. ... The fact that Uma Devi died within a short time after making the statement does not render it unreliable so long as it is found that

India - Madhya Pradesh

6. R. Srinivasan VS D. Venkataramanan - 26 May 20

Uma Devi (Uma Devi) as their foster daughters - In addition, 's sister's son, lived with and looked after them - During life time ... property bearing Old Nos. 64 and 66, New No. 49-B, Avenue, Property) was purchased in joint names of Varadarajulu and Sakuntala Devi ... Sections 68 and 69 of the Evidence Act merely because it is a registered Will and because it is referred to in Will of Sakuntala Devi ... Uma Devi (Uma Devi) as their foster daughters. ... Under this Will, the Shenoy Nagar Property was bequeathed as follows: life estate in one half of the property to Meenakshi and Uma ... Sakuntala Devi (Sakuntala Devi/testatrix), which is the subject matter of T.O.S. No. 29 of 2015.

India - Madras

7. Manoj Kumar Sinha VS State of Jharkhand - 09 Sep 15

Devi and M.L. ... also retired from service—Proper consideration of individual cases must be accorded by department—In terms with law laid down in Uma ... Uma Devi and Others, 2006 (4) SCC 1. ... Uma Devi and Others, 2006 (4) SCC 1 through ... Uma Devi and Others, 2006 (4) SCC 1 and also

India - Jharkhand

8. Jagmohan Batham VS State of M. P. - 18 Oct 95

The land was developed and the roads were laid on the land by the petitioner and co – accused Uma Devi. ... Co – accused Uma Devi had consented to the documents. ... 5. ... One suit out of the two was filed by co – accused Uma Devi and the other by the petitioner, and both were against Bhajni, the bhumiswami

India - Madhya Pradesh

9. Tej Narayan Yadav VS State Of Bihar - 08 Feb 08

since 1983 not under the cover or protection of Orders of any Court or Tribunal-In terms of Para 44 of the judgment in the case of Uma ... Devi [2006(2) PLJR (SC)363]-Respondents directed to take a decisions with regard to regularisation of petitioner as acne time measure ... Uma Devi, 2006 2 PLJR 363 to

India - Patna

10. M. M. Najeema VS Kerala State Beverages (M&M) Corporation - 27 Nov 12

Uma Devi and others. ... Uma Devi [ 2006 (4) SCC 1] to the effect that no regularisation can be given to temporary

India - Kerala