AI Overview...

Uttam Singh Dugal & Co. - Main points and insights:
The firm has been involved in legal cases concerning contractual and financial disputes, including cases referenced in Shiva Steels (2010 LW 14 SC) and Union Bank of India (2000(5) Supreme 425) Owners and Persons interested in the Vessel M. V. GATI ZIPP Now lying at the Port of Chennai rep. by its Master VS Mars Petrochem Pvt. Ltd. - Madras.
In the Shiva Steels case, the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of clear admissions of part payment and the significance of providing adequate explanations, with earlier decisions considered in its judgment Owners and Persons interested in the Vessel M. V. GATI ZIPP Now lying at the Port of Chennai rep. by its Master VS Mars Petrochem Pvt. Ltd. - Madras.
The firm has also been involved in arbitration proceedings under Section 33 of the Arbitration Act, as seen in the case against the Union of India (1962), where issues of contractual rights and arbitration were discussed Kehar Dass VS Tarak Singh - Punjab and Haryana.
Corporate Governance and Shareholding:
Amrik Singh Bhandari, a director, sold shares and terminated his association with the company in 1973, which impacted the company's internal management and legal standing AMRIK SINGH BHANDARI VS UTTAM SINGH DUGAL AND COMPANY LIMITED - Delhi.
The company’s management, including the Managing Director Harcharan Singh Dugal, was authorized to execute documents and affix the company's seal, indicating formal corporate procedures Uttam Singh Dugal And Company LTD. VS Union Bank Of India - Supreme Court, Uttam Singh Dugal and Co. Ltd. VS United Bank of India - Rajasthan.
Legal Proceedings and Taxation:
The company was involved in tax-related cases, specifically regarding the applicability of Section 23A(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, with judicial determinations on its status as a contractor and its tax obligations COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS UTTAM SINGH DUGAL AND COMPANY LIMITED - Delhi.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Uttam Singh Dugal & Co. has a notable legal history involving contractual disputes, arbitration, corporate governance, and taxation issues.
The firm's cases highlight the importance of clear documentation, proper management authorizations, and adherence to legal procedures.
References to Supreme Court judgments and arbitration cases underscore its longstanding presence and influence in legal and commercial matters Owners and Persons interested in the Vessel M. V. GATI ZIPP Now lying at the Port of Chennai rep. by its Master VS Mars Petrochem Pvt. Ltd. - Madras, Kehar Dass VS Tarak Singh - Punjab and Haryana, Uttam Singh Dugal And Company LTD. VS Union Bank Of India - Supreme Court.

References: - Shiva Steels (2010 LW 14 SC) Owners and Persons interested in the Vessel M. V. GATI ZIPP Now lying at the Port of Chennai rep. by its Master VS Mars Petrochem Pvt. Ltd. - Madras - Uttam Singh Dugal & Co. v. Union Bank of India (2000 Supreme 425) Owners and Persons interested in the Vessel M. V. GATI ZIPP Now lying at the Port of Chennai rep. by its Master VS Mars Petrochem Pvt. Ltd. - Madras - Uttam Singh Dugal & Co. v. Union of India (1962 Civil Appeal No. 162) Kehar Dass VS Tarak Singh - Punjab and Haryana - Corporate authorizations involving Managing Director Harcharan Singh Dugal Uttam Singh Dugal And Company LTD. VS Union Bank Of India - Supreme Court, Uttam Singh Dugal and Co. Ltd. VS United Bank of India - Rajasthan - Tax case regarding Section 23A of the Income-tax Act COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS UTTAM SINGH DUGAL AND COMPANY LIMITED - Delhi

Search Results for "Uttam Singh Dugal"

Owners and Persons interested in the Vessel M. V. GATI ZIPP Now lying at the Port of Chennai rep. by its Master VS Mars Petrochem Pvt. Ltd.

2012 0 Supreme(Mad) 1574 • India - Madras

C.NAGAPPAN, M.SATHYANARAYANAN

Shiva Steels (2010 (5) LW 14 (SC)), Uttam Singh Dugal & Co. ... In Uttam Singh Duggal & Co. Ltd. Vs. ... Shiva Steels (2010 (5) LW 14 (SC)) and Uttam Singh Dugal & Co. Ltd. – Vs – United Bank of India & Ors. (2001 (1) LW 250 (SC) held that there is a clear admission of part payment and there is no sufficient explanation offered is also evasive in nature. ... In para-9 of the said judgment, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has considered its earlier decision....

1977 0 Supreme(P&H) 29 • India - Punjab and Haryana

GURNAM SINGH, HARBANS LAL

Uttam Singh Dugal and Co. V/s. ... Uttam Singh Dugal and Co. V/s. Union of India, Civil Appeal No. 162 of 1962, decided on 11-10-1962. In this case Messrs. Uttam Singh Dugal and Co. had filed an application under S. 33 of the Arbitration Act. The Union of India called upon respondent No. 2 Col. S. K. ... Uttam Singh Dugal and Co. V/s. Union of India (Civil Appeal No. 162 of 1962,....

ZODIAC POWER CONTROLS LIMITED VS UTTAM SINGH DUGAL AND COMPANY LIMITED

2003 0 Supreme(Del) 218 • India - Delhi

P.C.JAIN

BANK OF BARODA VS UTTAM SINGH DUGAL AND COMPANY LIMITED

1979 0 Supreme(Del) 260 • India - Delhi

S.B.WAD, RAJINDAR SACHAR

UNION OF INDIA VS UTTAM SINGH DUGAL AND COMPANY LIMITED

1971 0 Supreme(Del) 187 • India - Delhi

B.C.MISRA

Shri Mohinder Singh was examined on behalf of the petitioner as P. ... "the evidence of one witness Sardar Mohinder Singh, Executive Engineer, was partly recorded before the Subordinate Judge and the case was thereafter transferred to the High Court under the Delhi High Court Act and then the statement of Shri S. G. ... Shri Mohinder Singh, a witness examined on behalf ofthe petitioner as A. W. 1 has stated that he had taken over the charge of the office from Mr. Veerabadhu who had been the Executive Engineer of the Division till then and....

AMRIK SINGH BHANDARI VS UTTAM SINGH DUGAL AND COMPANY LIMITED

1978 0 Supreme(Del) 204 • India - Delhi

SULTAN SINGH

Amrik Singh Bhandari who was a Director of this Company has sold the shares held by him and other members of his family and terminated his association with the company on 16th May 1973. At the time of finalising his accounts with the company, Mr. ... SULTAN SINGH ... ( 1 ) THE petitioner filed the present petition under S. 8 of the Arbitration Act alleging that he was one of the directors of the company respondent No. 1, that he ceased to be the director of the company from 16th May, 1973 ... arbitrator, that Shri Watel expressed his inability to act as an....

Uttam Singh Dugal And Company LTD. VS Union Bank Of India

2000 5 Supreme 425 • India - Supreme Court

SHIVARAJ V.PATIL, S.RAJENDRA BABU

... *************** ... Parallel Citations of other Journals : ... Uttam Singh Dugal & Co. Ltd. v. Union Bank of India & Ors., 2000(5) Supreme 425 : 2000 (9) JT 78 : 2000 (30 Cur. ... Harcharan Singh Dugal, the Managing Director of the Company be and is hereby authorised to execute the said documents and the official seal of the Company be affixed thereon.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS UTTAM SINGH DUGAL AND COMPANY LIMITED

1973 0 Supreme(Del) 177 • India - Delhi

M.R.A.ANSARI, P.N.KHANNA

... "whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in holding that the provisions of section 23a (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 were not applicable to the case of Messrs Uttam Singh Duggal and Co. ... " ... ( 2 ) THE respondent company, Messrs Uttam Singh Duggal and Company Private Limited, New Delhi, herein called the assessee , is a private limited company carrying on business as a contractor. ... a copy of which is annexed as part of the statement of the case and contended that out....

Uttam Singh Dugal and Co. Ltd. VS United Bank of India

2000 0 Supreme(Raj) 580 • India - Rajasthan

S.RAJENDRA BABU, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL

Harcharan Singh Dugal, the Managing Director of the Company be and is hereby authorised to execute the said documents and the official seal of the Company be affixed thereon.

GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY VS UTTAM SINGH DUGAL AND COMPANY LIMITED

1996 0 Supreme(Del) 904 • India - Delhi

R.C.LAHOTI, S.N.KAPUR

Filter by Legal Phrase

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

Approbate and Reprobate: Key Legal Doctrine Explained Vague Threatening Phone Calls: Why They Fail in Court Does SCC Own Copyright on Full Text Judgments? G.O. Ms No. 108: TN Salesman & Packer Recruitment Rules Article 226 vs 227: Key Differences in High Court Powers Judgments on One-Time GNA Charges in India TIP: Judicial vs Executive Magistrate Rules Explained Can a Sole Dissenting Member Block Society Redevelopment? How to Sue Fake Facebook Accounts for Defamation in India Illustrations: Person Dominating Will in Indian Law Perusal in Court Orders: What It Means in Law Litigant Vigilance: Essential Duty in Court Proceedings What to Do If Company Suit Signatory Dies Renting House Without Rent Agreement in India: Risks Stay on Money Realization After Ejectment: Is It Possible?