AI Overview...
- Uttar Pradesh Development Authorities Centralised Services Rules, 1985 - Establishes a comprehensive framework for the appointment, promotion, seniority, disciplinary proceedings, and regulation of services within development authorities in Uttar Pradesh. The rules facilitate the creation of centralized service structures for development authorities to ensure standardized personnel management. Brijesh Bahadur Singh VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, Mahendra Pratap Singh VS State of U. P. and Ghaziabad Development Authority - Allahabad, SHRIPAL BHATI VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Allahabad, [SURESH KUMAR SINGH CHAUHAN
VS STATE OF U P -
Allahabad](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/02500042979), Mukesh Agrawal VS Meerut Development Authority - Allahabad, PRADEEP KUMAR GARG, ETC. VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Allahabad, Puran Kumar VS State of Uttar Pradesh - Allahabad, Ajay Kumar Singh VS State of Uttar Pradesh - Supreme Court, Ajay Kumar Singh VS State of Uttar Pradesh - Supreme Court
-
Creation of Centralized Services - Rules 34(4) and 37 empower authorities to create centralized services, regulate appointments, and manage service conditions uniformly across development authorities, aligning with constitutional provisions such as Article 226 for judicial review. Brijesh Bahadur Singh VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, SHRIPAL BHATI VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Allahabad
-
Appointments and Promotions - The rules specify procedures for direct recruitment, promotion (e.g., from Junior Engineer to Assistant Engineer), and seniority determination, including considerations for promotees versus direct appointees, with required consultations and adherence to quotas. Ajay Kumar Singh VS State of Uttar Pradesh - Supreme Court, Ajay Kumar Singh VS State of Uttar Pradesh - Supreme Court, Mahendra Pratap Singh VS State of U. P. and Ghaziabad Development Authority - Allahabad
-
Disciplinary Proceedings - Rule 15962 details the conduct of disciplinary inquiries under the rules, ensuring procedural fairness in disciplinary actions against employees. Puran Kumar VS State of Uttar Pradesh - Allahabad
-
Legal and Judicial Oversight - Supreme Court judgments have directed regularization of services and adherence to the rules, emphasizing the importance of following prescribed procedures for appointments, seniority, and service regularization. Mukesh Agrawal VS Meerut Development Authority - Allahabad
-
Integration with Other Laws - The rules interface with other statutes like the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, and the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Area Development Act, 1976, especially concerning deputation, seniority, and service absorption. Indu Shekhar Singh VS State Of U. P. - Supreme Court, PRADEEP KUMAR GARG, ETC. VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Allahabad
-
Insights - The rules aim to streamline personnel management within development authorities, promote transparency, and uphold constitutional and judicial directives. They also address issues related to seniority, service regularization, and disciplinary procedures, ensuring consistency and fairness.
-
Conclusion - The Uttar Pradesh Development Authorities Centralised Services Rules, 1985, serve as a vital legal framework governing the recruitment, promotion, seniority, and disciplinary processes for employees in development authorities, facilitating standardized and lawful administrative practices across the state. They have been subject to judicial review to ensure compliance with constitutional mandates and judicial directions.
Search Results for "Uttar Pradesh Development Authorities Centralised Services Rules 1985"
2023 0 Supreme(All) 1066 • India - Allahabad
J. J. MUNIR
5A - Uttar Pradesh Government Servants (Medical Attendance) Rules, 2011 - Uttar Pradesh Development Authorities Centralised Services ... Rules, 1985 - Rule 37, Rule 34(4) - Development Authority - Regulation of other matters - Creation of Centralized Services - Whether ... Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Uttar #HL_....
2007 0 Supreme(All) 3245 • India - Allahabad
TARUN AGARWALA
Public Relation Officer - Appointment and Jurisdiction - Uttar Pradesh Development Authorities Centralised Services Rules, 1985 ... The State Government, however, directed the Authority to terminate the petitioner's services, leading to a writ petition. ... - Rule 14, Schedule VIII - The judgment discusses the illegal appointment of a Public Relation Officer by the Ghaziabad Development ... Admittedly, the Ghaziaba....
2006 0 Supreme(All) 3234 • India - Allahabad
V.C.MISRA, AMITAVA LALA
Development Authorities Centralised Service Rules, 1985—Rules 2(1)(ii)—U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976—Section 197]. ... Authority, on substantive capacity—And since creation of Development Authorities Centralised Services, he is a Member of Centralised ... Services—Creation of Centralised Service,....
2003 0 Supreme(All) 424 • India - Allahabad
MARKANDEY KATJU, PRAKASH KRISHNA
Development Authority Centralised Services Rules, 1985. ... Development Authority Centralised Services Rules, 1985, Rule 20-A Fact of the Case: The petitioners challenged an order ... Development Authority Centralised Service (Seventh Amendment Rules), 2001. ... Development Authorities Centralised#....
1992 0 Supreme(All) 770 • India - Allahabad
R.A.SHARMA
Development Authorities Centralised Services Rules, 1985 (the Rules). ... DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES CENTRALISED SERVICES RULES, 1985 - RULES 8, 9 - SUPREME COURT ORDERS DATED 21-2-1991 AND 4-9-1991 - WRIT ... PETITIONS ALLOWED - DIRECTIONS ISSUED TO REGULARISE SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULES AND SUPREME COURT....
2007 0 Supreme(All) 1831 • India - Allahabad
V.M.SAHAI, SABHAJEET YADAV
from date of their permanent absorption for purposes of determination of seniority under Regulation 24(2) of New Okhla Industrial Development ... Authority—Service Regulations, 1981, is without any legal basis, wholly misplaced—Hence, has to be rejected—Past services rendered ... of Authority, shall be counted and computed towards length of their services for purposes of determination of their seniority on ... Jal Nigam and absorbed in the services of the Development Authorit....
2024 0 Supreme(All) 926 • India - Allahabad
J. J. MUNIR
The inquiry was conducted under the Uttar Pradesh Development Authorities Centralised Service Rules, 1985, and the Uttar Pradesh ... for conducting disciplinary inquiries under the Uttar Pradesh Development Authorities Centralised Service Rules, 1985, and the Utta....
2006 5 Supreme 12 • India - Supreme Court
S.B.SINHA, P.P.NAOLEKAR
(i) Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 — Section 4, 5A (as inserted by U.P. Act No. 21 of 1985) — U.P. ... Development Authority Centralised Services Rules, 1985 — Rules 7, 28 — Deputation — Determination of seniority — Appointments of ... The employees working with Jal Nigam might have been deputed to the services of the Development Authorities#HL_E....
2018 0 Supreme(SC) 1275 • India - Supreme Court
KURIAN JOSEPH, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
Development Authorities Centralised Services Rules, 1985 – Rule 8, 20-A – Promotion from Junior engineer to Assistant Engineer – ... Development Authorities Centralised Services Rules, 1985 – Article 320(3), Constitution ... Development Authorities Centralised Services through direct recruitment and promotion....
2018 0 Supreme(SC) 1326 • India - Supreme Court
KURIAN JOSEPH, SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
Development Authorities Centralised Services Rules, 1985—Rules 21, 21A—Seniority—Determination—Promotees vis-a-vis direct appointees—Consultation ... Development Authorities Centralised Services—Appointments of direct appointees made by a stop gap arrangement which was regularized—In ... terms of 50 per cent quota as per Rules promotees were drawn and promoted — Executive Governm....
Filter by Legal Phrase
