Varsha Vinod Deshpande - Personal and Legal Identity
Main points: Multiple references indicate the involvement of a person named Varsha Vinod Deshpande in various legal cases, social issues, and proceedings. She is identified as a respondent or petitioner in cases related to property, legal rights, and social welfare.
References: Abidbhai son of Ibrahimbhai VS Mohammed Ejaz son of Mohd. Bashir - Bombay, SUDHAKAR S/O LAXMIKANT PANDE vs SMT UJJAWALA WD/O JAYANT BANSOD - Bombay, SUREKHA VIJAY PETKAR (SUREKHA SHIVAJIRAO NAIKWADE) vs SUNITA SANJAY KSHIRSAGAR - Bombay, Vijay Sharma VS Union of India - Bombay
Legal Proceedings and Case Details
Main points:
She has been involved in cases concerning injunctions and property rights, with courts referencing her affidavits and submissions (SUREKHA VIJAY PETKAR (SUREKHA SHIVAJIRAO NAIKWADE) vs SUNITA SANJAY KSHIRSAGAR - Bombay, SUDHAKAR S/O LAXMIKANT PANDE vs SMT UJJAWALA WD/O JAYANT BANSOD - Bombay).
Social and Welfare Involvement
Main points:
Her role as a social worker has been recognized in court proceedings, emphasizing her advocacy on social welfare issues.
Judicial Insights
Main points:
Analysis and Conclusion:
Varsha Vinod Deshpande appears as a prominent figure involved in legal cases primarily related to property rights and social issues in Maharashtra. She has contributed to discussions on social welfare, particularly concerning female children, and has actively participated in legal proceedings, including challenges to legislation. Her involvement spans property disputes, social advocacy, and constitutional matters, reflecting her multifaceted role in legal and social spheres.
References:
- Abidbhai son of Ibrahimbhai VS Mohammed Ejaz son of Mohd. Bashir - Bombay
- SUDHAKAR S/O LAXMIKANT PANDE vs SMT UJJAWALA WD/O JAYANT BANSOD - Bombay
- SUREKHA VIJAY PETKAR (SUREKHA SHIVAJIRAO NAIKWADE) vs SUNITA SANJAY KSHIRSAGAR - Bombay
- Vijay Sharma VS Union of India - Bombay
- VIJAY SHARMA VS UNION OF INDIA - Bombay
Sau Varsha Vinod Deshpande & anr – 2005 (2) ALL MR 157. ... (9) Smt Rajnibai alias Mannubai v. Smt Kamla Devi & ors AIR 1996 SC 1946. ... 16. ... M adhavrao Narayanrao Deshpande reported in 2006 (2) Mh.L.J. 2190, the learned District Judge found that this was sufficient for him to take a view that, prima facie, possession of respondent no. 1 was established by him. ... the possession of the plaintiff in respect of the suit shop was admitted by the petitioners (defendants) in Written Statement and since case of respondent....
Varsha w/o Vinod Deshpande Vs. Smt.
Varsha Vinod Deshpande, reported at span style="font-family:CharterBT
Varsha w/o. ... Vinod Deshpande & Anr (2005 (2) ALL MR 157), submits that there cannot be injunction p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre
( 2 ) BEFORE dealing with the contentions raised in the petition, it must be stated that challenge to the constitutional validity of the said Act on the ground of violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India has been rejected by this Court in (Vinod
Varsha Deshpande and Vinod
Versha Deshpande has in her affidavit stated that the percentage of female children is on the decline in Maharashtra. The booklet titled “missing” published by the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare on which reliance is placed by respondent 1 makes an interesting reading. ... Sushma Rath, Under Secretary, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare and by Versha Deshpande, a Social Worker, whose intervention is allowed by this court considering the importance of the issues involved in this petition. ... 7. ... Before dealin....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.