AI Overview...
Veracity of the Contents of Documents
-
Proof of Contents - Merely marking, filing, or attesting a document does not prove the truth or veracity of its contents unless supported by additional evidence or unless explicitly indicated in the document or established by collateral evidence. (Sources: Ramanand Pandit Alias Tulshan Pandit VS Jangali Pandit - Patna, Vodagandla Sudhakar Reddy VS State of A. P. - Andhra Pradesh, Rev. Noble Philip, S/o. Philip VS Nevin Noble (Minor), S/o. Noble Philip - Kerala)
-
Attestation and Evidence - Attestation alone is generally insufficient to establish the veracity of a document's contents; the original document or primary evidence is required, especially when the truth of contents is in question. (Sources: Ramanand Pandit Alias Tulshan Pandit VS Jangali Pandit - Patna, Rev. Noble Philip, S/o. Philip VS Nevin Noble (Minor), S/o. Noble Philip - Kerala)
-
Acceptance by Witnesses - If a witness explicitly accepts the contents of a document, it can support its veracity; however, this acceptance must be clear, and the document's contents should not be denied. (Sources: Bahadur Singh VS State of Punjab - Orissa, Jawari Lal Bhati VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan)
-
Role of Courts and Authorities - Courts recognize that the execution of a document does not automatically establish the truth of its contents. The veracity is subject to proof and scrutiny, and courts may examine whether the document is genuine and whether its contents are accurate. (Sources: Bahadur Singh VS State of Punjab - Orissa, Public Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh,Hyderabad VS Kundavaram Chandrachari - Madras, Jawari Lal Bhati VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan)
-
Legal Standards and Evidence Act - Under Indian Evidence Act, primary proof such as the original document is necessary to establish contents. Secondary evidence or mere marking is insufficient when the veracity is disputed. (Sources: Rev. Noble Philip, S/o. Philip VS Nevin Noble (Minor), S/o. Noble Philip - Kerala, Ramanand Pandit Alias Tulshan Pandit VS Jangali Pandit - Patna, Vodagandla Sudhakar Reddy VS State of A. P. - Andhra Pradesh)
-
Special Cases (e.g., Passports) - Documents like passports are issued based on submitted documents, but their contents' veracity, such as date of birth, cannot be conclusively determined by the issuing authority at a later stage. (Sources: M.KUNHIMOIDEENKUTTY Vs THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER - Kerala)
-
Procedural Aspects - Document marking and admissibility are procedural; the actual proof of correctness and truth of contents requires primary evidence and proper examination. (Sources: J. M. Constructions VS Shamrock Impex Pvt. Ltd. - Bombay, Ramanand Pandit Alias Tulshan Pandit VS Jangali Pandit - Patna)
Analysis and Conclusion
The veracity of document contents hinges on proper evidence, including the original documents, witness testimony, and collateral proof. Attestation or mere filing does not suffice to establish truth, especially when contents are disputed. Courts emphasize the importance of primary evidence and scrutinize whether documents genuinely reflect the facts they purport to represent. Overall, establishing the truthfulness of a document's contents requires a combination of procedural adherence and substantive proof, rather than reliance on attestations or procedural markings alone.
References: - Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Sections 64, 68, 90, 92, 114 - AIR 1922 P. - Various court judgments on proof and veracity of documents
Search Results for "Veracity of the Contents of Documents"
1993 0 Supreme(Pat) 272 • India - Patna
S.N.JHA
of the contents of the documents and can not be a conclusive proof of knowledge of the contents of a document-AIR 1922 P. ... witnessing only-unless otherwise indicated in the recital of attestation or established by a collecteral evidence it is no proof of veracity ... Paras 5, 11 & 12) ... Evidence Act, 1872, sec 68, 90-attestation in a document-attestation ... Unless otherwise indicated in the recital of attestation or established by collateral evidence, it is no proof of the #HL_ST....
2020 0 Supreme(Del) 160 • India - Delhi
PRATEEK JALAN
AND CONTENTS OF DOCUMENTS - REASONABLENESS - FAILURE OF ARBITRATOR TO CONSIDER DISPUTES RAISED BY THE PETITIONER WITH REGARD TO ... was no motive for the officers to fabricate the documents. ... INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION - APPLICATION TO THE FACTS OF THE PRESENT CASE - REQUEST FOR ORAL EVIDENCE TO BE LED ON THE VERACITY ... The only analysis in the impugned award with regard to the veracity of the documents sought to be impeached by the petitioner is as follows: "v. ... In ....
2011 0 Supreme(Ori) 151 • India - Orissa
HARJIT SINGH BEDI, CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD
of the contents of the documents had been accepted by P.W.3 - Recovery of 10 kgs. of opium from the appellant becomes suspect - ... SSP, Khanna - High Court's observation that Exhibit DD being a news item could not be taken into evidence is not correct, as the veracity ... In our view, the High Court’s observation that Exhibit DD being a news item could not be taken into evidence, is not correct, as the veracity of the contents of the document, had been accepted by PW-3. We accordingly....
2019 0 Supreme(AP) 334 • India - Andhra Pradesh
D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU
is not proof of the contents of the documents, when the truth or the veracity of the contents is an issue - Apart from all of this ... reliable evidence - As has been held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on more than one occasion the mere marking or filing of the document ... As has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India on more than one occasion the mere marking or filing of the document is not proof of the contents of the documents, ....
1995 0 Supreme(Mad) 880 • India - Madras
RAJAGOPALA REDDY
It is now contended, forcefully, by the learned Public Prosecutor that the approach of the learned Magistrate is contrary to legal requirements as contemplated under Secs.239 and 240 of the Code and that the Magistrate is not entitled to appreciate as to the veracity of the contents of the documents ... On the other hand, the counsel for the respondent argued that the duty of the Magistrate is not only to examine the documents before him but also to summon the documents, if necessary to make an enquiry ....
2010 0 Supreme(Del) 1177 • India - Delhi
RAJIV SHAKDHER
Whether these documents included the lease deeds in issue, is a matter which can only be ascertained after evidence is led by the parties. It is well settled execution of documents by itself does not establish the veracity of contents of documents. (See Judah v. ... Aneja that by virtue of Section 92 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the plaintiffs cannot lead evidence contrary to the contents of documents, it is well settled that evidence can be led to explain the circum....
2020 0 Supreme(Ker) 411 • India - Kerala
MARY JOSEPH
a document must produce the original of the document, unless the opposite party has admitted the contents thereof-The respondent ... Indian Evidence Act, 1872- Section 64 -Documents intended to be relied on by a party must be proved by primary ... evidence except in the cases specifically mentioned in the Act- The best evidence rule says that a party seeks to put contents of ... Admission of documents in court may amount to admission of its contents, but not the #HL_S....
2021 Supreme(Online)(KER) 46920 • India - High Court of Kerala
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
Ratio Decidendi: The court asserted that passports are issued based on documents provided at the time of application, and ... birth on his passport and sought correction based on recent records, asserting his actual date of birth as per local government documents ... Finding of the Court: The court noted the stringency in correcting such a solemn document as a passport, stating there ... The passport issuing authority cannot determine the veracity of date of birth now seen in the certificates produced, since such a po....
2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 2088 • India - Bombay
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
of its contents depends say on documents nature source statutory presumptions it may carry with it - Even if all these aspects are ... matter - Pithily put document marking is procedural document proving is adjudicatory-judicial - Proof of document that is veracity ... Evidence Act - Sections 74, 75, 77, 78, 79, 65 and 114 - Public Documents Or Private Documents - Petitioner ... Pithily put, document marking is procedural; #HL_START....
2006 0 Supreme(Raj) 531 • India - Rajasthan
GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS
Once the witness has testified to the veracity of the documents and contents of the document are not denied, the Court should not have raised questions alien to the admissibility of the evidence. ... 6.Witness Dr. ... Documents, Exhibit P-1 scholar register and Exhibit P-2 horoscope were exhibited in support of the age of the accused. ... The learned trial Court, after recording the evidence and taking into account the documents filed by the accused, rejected the application vide orde....
Filter by Legal Phrase
