AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion

The consensus across judicial decisions and legal interpretations is that the right to vote is a constitutional right in India, protected as a fundamental right under the Constitution. While certain restrictions are permissible, they must adhere to constitutional principles of fairness and non-discrimination. Therefore, the right to vote is primarily a constitutional right, integral to democratic participation, with statutory rules supplementing its regulation.


References:
- Indra Kumar VS Union Of India - Patna
- Rajbala VS State of Haryana - Supreme Court
- M. Peeran Saheb VS Special Officer cum Collector - Andhra Pradesh
- Kshatriya Kshema Sabha, Kottakkakam VS Election Commission Rep. by the Chief Electoral Officer - Kerala
- State of Meghalaya VS Brightstarwell Marbaniang - Meghalaya
- Kethamreddi Venkata Ramana Reddi VS Government Of A. P. - Andhra Pradesh
- Baldev Singh VS State Of Punjab - Punjab and Haryana
- K. Venkata Ramana Reddi VS Government Of A. P. - Andhra Pradesh

Search Results for "Whether Right to Vote is Constitutional Right or Not"

Indra Kumar VS Union Of India

1994 0 Supreme(Pat) 412 India - Patna

ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, K.VENKATASWAMI

Whether the right to vote is a constitutional right? 3. ... The right to vote is a statutory right, not a constitutional right. 3. ... ELECTION - PHOTO IDENTITY CARD - RIGHT TO VOTE - CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT - BASIC STRUCTURE OF THE CONSTITUTION - ARBITRARY FIXATION ... The next question is whether the #HL_START....

Rajbala VS State of Haryana

2016 3 Supreme 298 India - Supreme Court

J.CHELAMESWAR, A.M.SAPRE

, whether Constitutional or statutory. ... contest – Whether Constitutional right or statutory right – Held, both are constitutional rights of the citizen – a (Para 5, The question whether the right to vote in or contest an election is a constitutional or statutory right was not in issue. Mohan Lal case was dealing with provisions of the U.P. ... Answers to que....

M. Peeran Saheb VS Special Officer cum Collector

1987 0 Supreme(AP) 122 India - Andhra Pradesh

S.S.M.QUADRI

Whether the requirement of photo identity cards for voting in municipal elections is constitutional. 2. ... Whether the requirement violates Article 25(1) of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to freedom of conscience and the right ... or to forgo their right to vote in case of not taking the photo, violated Article 25(1) of the Constitution, which guarantees the ... It is evident that right freely to profess and practice ....

JOMINI MARY ABRAHAM vs MARTHOMA METROPOLITAN AND OTHERS

2009 Supreme(Online)(KER) 26702 India - High Court of Kerala

THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the right to vote includes the right to ensure a fair election process and that ... unmarked ballots affected the election outcome as per Church constitutional provisions. ... Issues: The primary issues included the maintainability of the suit, interpretation of sections within the Specific Relief Act, and whether ... It will be a travesty of justice to tell the plaintiff that Ext.A1 (Constitution) provided her a right to vote#HL_EN....

Kshatriya Kshema Sabha, Kottakkakam VS Election Commission Rep.  by the Chief Electoral Officer

2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 479 India - Kerala

C.T.RAVIKUMAR, N.NAGARESH

The rejection of the request to permit the Melsanthis of Sabarimala and Malikappuram Temples to cast postal vote ... It is not stated in the writ petition) filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs:- • To provide ... True that the right to vote is not available to certain categories namely, persons of unsound mind and persons convicted for certain criminal offences. The question whether the right to vote is a fundamental right#....

State of Meghalaya VS Brightstarwell Marbaniang

2023 0 Supreme(Megh) 9 India - Meghalaya

SANJIB BANERJEE, W. DIENGDOH

(Paras 9, 24) ... ... (C) Constitutional Rights - Discussion on the nature of the right to contest ... colleges - Petitioners challenged amendment barring teachers from political office - Writ petition allowed on grounds that teachers do not ... ... ... Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the amendment was not only beyond the authority of the State but also substantially ... It is needless to enter into a debate as to whether the right to vote and, whet....

Kethamreddi Venkata Ramana Reddi VS Government Of A. P.

1983 0 Supreme(AP) 127 India - Andhra Pradesh

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY

Whether the rule is violative of the fundamental right to contest election? Ratio Decidendi: 1. ... CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - ELECTION - TEACHERS CONSTITUENCY - QUALIFICATION OF CANDIDATES - RULE PROHIBITING TEACHERS FROM FILING NOMINATION ... Whether the impugned rule prohibiting teachers from filing nomination without prior permission of the management is valid? 2. ... The petitioner cannot be punished for exercising his lawful and legitimate right. The learned Government pleader argued that the ....

Baldev Singh VS State Of Punjab

1993 0 Supreme(P&H) 349 India - Punjab and Haryana

S.D.AGARWALA, JAWAHAR LAL GUPTA

The right to vote or to contest any election is not a constitutional or fundamental right. ... Whether Rule 42 of the Gram Panchayat Election Rules 1960 is ultra vires the Constitution of India? 2. ... Whether the provision for filing an election petition before the Executive Magistrate is violative of the basic structure of the ... ... 8 A right to vote or to contest any election is not a constitutional....

K. Venkata Ramana Reddi VS Government Of A. P.

1983 0 Supreme(AP) 126 India - Andhra Pradesh

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY

Whether the impugned rule prohibiting teachers from filing nomination without prior permission is valid? 2. ... Whether the petitioner, being a teacher in a private college, is disqualified from contesting from the Teachers Constituency? ... The court further held that the rule is violative of Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution, as it is not "right, just and fair", but ... Whether it is a constitutional right or a legal right, it is a very basic and ....

Raja Ram Pal VS Hon’ble Speaker, Lok Sabha

2007 1 Supreme 245 India - Supreme Court

Y. K. SABHARWAL, K. G. BALAKRISHNAN, C. K. THAKKER, R. V. RAVEENDRAN, D. K. JAIN

be represented and the right to vote—Fundamental rights of the member—Power of self composition not available to the Parliament—Whether ... provisions is not correct; ... j.If a citizen, whether a non-member ... nbsp;f.The fact that Parliament is an august body of co-ordinate constitutional position does not mean that ... In this regard, it is first important to note that the right to vote has been held to be only....

SupremeToday Landscape Ad

Filter by Legal Phrase

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

Legal Issues on Supreme Today AI

logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top