AI Overview...
- Winding Up Scheme Bona Fide - Main points and insights:
- Several cases highlight that schemes proposed during winding-up proceedings must be genuine, bona fide, feasible, and in the interest of creditors and the company (e.g., Motorol (India) Limited, In re. VS M. S. Shah - Gujarat, K. R. BALASUBRAMANYAM VS BELLARY SPINNING AND WEAVING COMPANY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION), BELLARY - Karnataka).
- Schemes that are found to be unworkable, vague, or intended to delay proceedings are rejected by courts (e.g., K. R. BALASUBRAMANYAM VS BELLARY SPINNING AND WEAVING COMPANY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION), BELLARY - Karnataka, NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LIMITED VS INDUSTRIAL METAL WORKS (P) LIMITED - Calcutta).
-
Courts emphasize the importance of the scheme being in the overall interest of creditors and the public, ensuring it is viable and beneficial (e.g., BENGANI FOOD PRODUCTS PRIVATE LTD. VS OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR AND ORS. - Allahabad, In matter of Punjab Maize Product Ltd. (In Liqn. ) VS . - Punjab and Haryana).
-
Court's Role and Jurisdiction:
- The courts supervise, approve, or revoke schemes based on their viability and adherence to legal requirements, such as Sections 391 and 392 of the Companies Act, 1956/2013 (e.g., NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LIMITED VS INDUSTRIAL METAL WORKS (P) LIMITED - Calcutta, Avikal Tradelink Pvt Ltd vs Perfect Connections Ltd Equinox Solutions Ltd - National Company Law Tribunal).
-
Courts can approve schemes of revival, amalgamation, or compromise, and even recall winding-up orders if the scheme is viable and in public interest (e.g., In matter of Punjab Maize Product Ltd. (In Liqn. ) VS . - Punjab and Haryana, Avikal Tradelink Pvt Ltd vs Perfect Connections Ltd Equinox Solutions Ltd - National Company Law Tribunal).
-
Interest and Claims in Winding Up:
- Disputed claims, especially involving interest (including penal or normal interest), are often contentious. Courts generally restrict interest payments if the scheme does not support such payments or if claims are barred by limitations (NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LIMITED VS INDUSTRIAL METAL WORKS (P) LIMITED - Calcutta, MYSORE ELECTRO CHEMICAL WORKS LIMITED (NOW UB-MEC BATTERIES LIMITED) VS G. K. PARMASHIV - Karnataka).
-
In some cases, interest payments are denied if the scheme is not genuine or if the company fails to fulfill its obligations under the scheme (e.g., MYSORE ELECTRO CHEMICAL WORKS LIMITED (NOW UB-MEC BATTERIES LIMITED) VS G. K. PARMASHIV - Karnataka).
-
Schemes of Revival and Amalgamation:
- Courts have approved schemes of revival and amalgamation that ensure statutory compliance and support public and creditors' interests, sometimes leading to the dissolution of the transferor company without winding up (Avikal Tradelink Pvt Ltd vs Perfect Connections Ltd Equinox Solutions Ltd - National Company Law Tribunal, In matter of Punjab Maize Product Ltd. (In Liqn. ) VS . - Punjab and Haryana).
-
Schemes must be scrutinized for their feasibility and bona fide nature; schemes intended solely to delay winding-up are rejected (K. R. BALASUBRAMANYAM VS BELLARY SPINNING AND WEAVING COMPANY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION), BELLARY - Karnataka).
-
Overall Insights:
- The legitimacy and success of a winding-up scheme depend on its bona fide nature, feasibility, and alignment with creditors' and public interests.
- Courts play a crucial role in supervising, approving, or revoking schemes to ensure they serve justice and economic efficiency.
- Schemes that are unworkable, vague, or intended to delay proceedings are typically disapproved, whereas viable schemes lead to restructuring, revival, or winding-up as appropriate.
References: - Motorol (India) Limited, In re. VS M. S. Shah - Gujarat, NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LIMITED VS INDUSTRIAL METAL WORKS (P) LIMITED - Calcutta, BENGANI FOOD PRODUCTS PRIVATE LTD. VS OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR AND ORS. - Allahabad, AMBICA TRADING CO. vs SHREE BANSIDHAR PVT. LTD. - Gujarat, Vasantha Mills Ltd. VS Industrial Reconstruction Bank of India - Madras, In matter of Punjab Maize Product Ltd. (In Liqn. ) VS . - Punjab and Haryana, K. R. BALASUBRAMANYAM VS BELLARY SPINNING AND WEAVING COMPANY LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION), BELLARY - Karnataka, Avikal Tradelink Pvt Ltd vs Perfect Connections Ltd Equinox Solutions Ltd - National Company Law Tribunal, MYSORE ELECTRO CHEMICAL WORKS LIMITED (NOW UB-MEC BATTERIES LIMITED) VS G. K. PARMASHIV - Karnataka
Search Results for "Winding up Interest Scheme"
1998 0 Supreme(Guj) 839 • India - Gujarat
M.S.SHAH
AND SHAREHOLDERS - BONA FIDE OF THE SCHEME - INTEREST OF THE COMPANY - WINDING UP PETITIONS PENDING - COURT'S ROLE IN SANCTIONING ... that the scheme was not moved bona fide and was not in the interest of the company. ... of the winding-up petitions. ... It is submitted that the scheme is not moved bona fide but is moved in order to delay the hearing of the winding up petitions. ... On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and the material o....
1982 0 Supreme(Cal) 30 • India - Calcutta
RAMENDRA MOHAN DATTA, C.K.BANERJEE
COMPANIES ACT - SECTIONS 391 & 392 - SCHEME OF COMPROMISE AND ARRANGEMENT - SUPERVISION AND MODIFICATION - WINDING UP - JURISDICTION ... OF COURT - CLAIM FOR ADDITIONAL AND PENAL INTEREST - DISPUTED CLAIM - SCHEME UNWORKABLE - POWER OF COURT - SCOPE AND AMBIT. ... Whether the scheme had become unworkable and the court could make an order of winding-up under Section 392 (2) of the Companies Act ... arrear amount pertaining to principal as well as normal interest had al....
1998 0 Supreme(All) 730 • India - Allahabad
A.K.BANERJI
order, provided it is a viable scheme in the interest of creditors and the general public. 2. ... INTEREST OF CREDITORS - PUBLIC INTEREST - SECTION 536(2) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956. ... even before passing the winding-up order. ... The court has the jurisdiction and the power to pass necessary orders provided it is found that the scheme or proposal which has been put forward was a viable scheme and would be in the interest of the creditors as well, ....
• India - Gujarat High Court
K.A. PUJ, J
, which contends the claims are barred by limitation and the BIFR scheme prohibits interest payments - Court notes that the petitioners ... (A) Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433(e), 434 - Winding up - Petitioner claims due payments and interest from respondent Company ... ' claims, including substantial interest, cannot be resolved in winding up proceedings and directs respondent to deposit amounts ... It is also a debatable issue as to whether the petitioners are entitled to....
1994 0 Supreme(Mad) 133 • India - Madras
SRINIVASAN
up of company - Effect on scheme - Workers' interest - Settlement under S. 12(3) of Industrial Disputes Act - Binding nature. ... There was no order winding up the company. The recommendation of the BIFR did not amount to winding up. ... Finding of the Court: The court held that the scheme framed by the AAIFR was binding on all parties concerned and could ... A perusal of the scheme shows that it is entirely in the larger #HL_STAR....
1995 0 Supreme(P&H) 995 • India - Punjab and Haryana
M.S.LIBERHAN
, (v) the scheme was in the interest of the company. ... The petitioners sought the revocation of the winding up, approval of the revival scheme, and interim stay during the winding up proceedings ... Final Decision: The court approved the scheme of revival and recalled the winding up order. ... The petitioners sought the revocation of the winding up approval of the revival scheme proposed and interim stay during the win....
2001 0 Supreme(P&H) 31 • India - Punjab and Haryana
N.K.SODHI, JASBIR SINGH
, leading to the conclusion that winding up was just, equitable, and in public interest. ... Finding of the Court: The court found that the company had ample opportunities to submit a viable scheme for rehabilitation ... The court emphasized the multiple opportunities given to the company for rehabilitation and the failure to submit a viable scheme ... The Board then formed a prima-facie opinion that winding up of the company was the only solution in the circumstances of the case. Ac....
1992 0 Supreme(Kar) 391 • India - Karnataka
Finding of the Court: The court found that the proposed scheme was not genuine, bona fide, feasible, or in the interest ... It concluded that the scheme was intended to delay the winding up proceedings and was extremely vague. ... It emphasized that the scheme must be genuine, bona fide, and in the interest of the creditors and the company. ... From the foregoing discussions it is clear that the scheme is put forth with a view to delay the #HL_STAR....
2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLT) 5162 • India - National Company Law Tribunal
Mr. Shammi Khan, J, Mr. Sameer Kakar, T
... ... Result: Scheme of Amalgamation sanctioned; Transferor Company shall be dissolved without winding up. ... ensures fulfillment of all statutory requirements supporting the public interest in corporate restructuring. ... (A) Companies Act, 2013 - Sections 230-232, and 66 - Scheme of arrangement and amalgamation approved - Scheme between three companies ... following the process of winding up. ... After analysing the Scheme in detail, this Tribunal is of the cons....
1993 0 Supreme(Kar) 35 • India - Karnataka
K.S.BHATT, M.M.MIRDHE
the amount due to its creditors under a scheme formulated in winding up proceedings. ... Interest - Company Scheme - Companies Act, 1956 - Section 392 - Karnataka Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1977 - ... Finding of the Court: The court held that the company, having failed to make the payment in terms of the scheme, was ... The claim now made against the company goes out of the scheme and, therefore, denial of interest under the #HL_....
Filter by Legal Phrase
