judgement
Subject : Civil Law - Property Disputes
The case involves a dispute between two sisters, Thankamma George (the Appellant) and Lilly Thomas (Respondent No. 1), over the ownership of a property. The Appellant, who had been working abroad as a nurse, had granted a power of attorney to Respondent No. 1 in 2003. In 2008, Respondent No. 1 sold a portion of the property to her husband, Respondent No. 2, without the Appellant's knowledge or consent.
The Appellant argued that the power of attorney granted to Respondent No. 1 had been impliedly revoked when the Appellant joined in the execution of a sale deed in 2008. The Appellant also claimed that the sale deed executed by Respondent No. 1 in favor of Respondent No. 2 was void ab initio due to the lack of consideration.
The Respondents, on the other hand, argued that the power of attorney was still valid and that the Appellant had received her share of the sale consideration from the previous transaction.
The court examined the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, particularly Sections 207 and 208, which deal with the revocation and termination of an agent's authority. The court found that the Appellant's act of independently executing a sale deed in 2008 amounted to an implied revocation of the power of attorney granted to Respondent No. 1.
The court also noted that the admission by Respondent No. 1 that no consideration was paid for the sale deed executed in favor of Respondent No. 2 rendered that transaction void ab initio.
The court allowed the Appellant's appeal and upheld the Appellant's half-share in the disputed property. The court directed the trial court to explore the possibility of determining the current market value of the Appellant's half-share and for the Respondents to pay the Appellant accordingly. If the parties fail to reach a consensus, the trial court was instructed to proceed with the final decree and execution in accordance with the law.
#PropertyDispute #AgencyLaw #ImpliedRevocation #SupremeCourtSupremeCourt
Rigors of Section 37 NDPS Act Prevail Over Detention Period Claims: High Court of J&K and Ladakh
11 Mar 2026
Failure to Pay Compensation Vitiates Limitation Claims in Land Acquisition: High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh
04 Mar 2026
Discretionary Nature of Section 143-A NI Act: J&K&L High Court Upholds Interim Compensation Based on Accused's Conduct
12 Jun 2026
Salman Khan Files Delhi HC Plea Against 'Kala Hiran'
12 Jun 2026
Writ Court Cannot Exercise Jurisdiction to Grant Interim Relief After Directing Litigant to Civil Forum: MP High Court
12 Jun 2026
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.