judgement
Subject : Civil Law - Property Disputes
Description :
The case involves a dispute between two sisters, Thankamma George (the Appellant) and Lilly Thomas (Respondent No. 1), over the ownership of a property. The Appellant, who had been working abroad as a nurse, had granted a power of attorney to Respondent No. 1 in 2003. In 2008, Respondent No. 1 sold a portion of the property to her husband, Respondent No. 2, without the Appellant's knowledge or consent.
The Appellant argued that the power of attorney granted to Respondent No. 1 had been impliedly revoked when the Appellant joined in the execution of a sale deed in 2008. The Appellant also claimed that the sale deed executed by Respondent No. 1 in favor of Respondent No. 2 was void ab initio due to the lack of consideration.
The Respondents, on the other hand, argued that the power of attorney was still valid and that the Appellant had received her share of the sale consideration from the previous transaction.
The court examined the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, particularly Sections 207 and 208, which deal with the revocation and termination of an agent's authority. The court found that the Appellant's act of independently executing a sale deed in 2008 amounted to an implied revocation of the power of attorney granted to Respondent No. 1.
The court also noted that the admission by Respondent No. 1 that no consideration was paid for the sale deed executed in favor of Respondent No. 2 rendered that transaction void ab initio.
The court allowed the Appellant's appeal and upheld the Appellant's half-share in the disputed property. The court directed the trial court to explore the possibility of determining the current market value of the Appellant's half-share and for the Respondents to pay the Appellant accordingly. If the parties fail to reach a consensus, the trial court was instructed to proceed with the final decree and execution in accordance with the law.
#PropertyDispute #AgencyLaw #ImpliedRevocation #SupremeCourtSupremeCourt
Supreme Court Rules Criminal Courts Must Not Act As Recovery Agents For Disputed Dues
27 Jul 2026
Rajya Sabha Bill Seeks To Criminalize Vande Mataram Disruption Under The National Honour Act
27 Jul 2026
Will Competitive Exams Deplete Delhi District Courts of Judges During Crucial Trial Proceedings This Year?
27 Jul 2026
Bombay High Court Adjourns Defamation Case Involving Union Minister Nitin Gadkari And Online Media Platforms
28 Jul 2026
Rajasthan High Court Directs State to Form Separate Wings for Crime Investigation and Security
28 Jul 2026
Gujarat High Court Upholds Constitutionality Of CGST Section 16 2 c Denying Unpaid Input Tax
28 Jul 2026
Punjab and Haryana High Court Issues New Guidelines For Legal Aid Defense Counsel System
28 Jul 2026
Government Introduces Public Examinations Amendment Bill 2026 In Lok Sabha To Curb Exam Paper Leaks
28 Jul 2026
Should Delhi High Court Increase Pecuniary Jurisdiction of District Courts to ₹10 Crore Threshold?
28 Jul 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.