Subject :
O R D E R
1. Delay condoned .
2. Heard Ms. Ruchira Goel learned counsel appearing for th e petitioner(s) .
3. Representing the State of U.P., the counsel submits tha t the present matter pertains to a Member of the Provincial Arme d Constabulary who were involved in the group mutiny in the yea r 1973. Following that the service of the respondent was terminate d on 23.08.1973 .
4. After his acquittal, the respondent was re-instated i n service on 27.09.2010. However, the direction issued by the Hig h Court in the second round of litigation ordering payment of arrear s salary to the respondent who was already superannuated from servic e on 30.11.2012, is the subject matter of challenge in the presen t special leave petition .
5. The learned counsel would submit that this Court in th e “State of U.P. vs. Mahindra Nath Tiwari” reported in (2010) 2 SC C 252 had clearly held that the decision dated 26.09.1997 in the W.P . No. 46061 of 1998 filed by the Vijay Bahadur Singh would no t entitle back wages, for the re-instated PAC Constable .
6. Ms. Goel would then cite the endorsement by a thre e Judges Bench of this Court on 08.10.2014 (Annexure P-18) on th e aforesaid view taken by this Court in Mahindra Nath Tiwari (supra ) in so far as dis-entitlement to back wages of the re-instated PA C Constable, is concerned .
7. It is accordingly argued that although the judgment i n Mahindra Nath Tiwari (supra) was pressed before the Division Bench , the High Court mechanically followed the judgment in SLP(C) No . 15220 of 2012 (Annexure P-11) in “State of U.P. & Ors. vs. Lalla n Shukla”. The State counsel would contend that granting of bac k wages for those who never rendered any service, is wholl y unjustified and it would place an unnecessary financial burden o n the State exchequer .
8. Issue notice, returnable in four weeks .
9. In the meantime, back wages need not be disbursed i n pursuance of the impugned judgment dated 03.07.2023 .
(NEETA SAPRA) (KAMLESH RAWAT )
COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRA R
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Ex-Parte Order Without Notice or Jurisdiction Constitutes 'Gross Abuse of Process': Rajasthan High Court
15 Jun 2026
Mandatory Administrative Enquiry Precedes FIR Against Public Servants Under SC/ST Act: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Assigning Administrative Charges to Tainted Officials Violates Natural Justice: MP High Court Quashes PWD Order
16 Jun 2026
Outsourced Employees Lack Right to Promotion; Unauthorized Designation Upgrades Are Legally Void: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Calcutta HC Questions Speaker’s Power to Appoint LoP
16 Jun 2026
Ponraj Challenges FIR Over Alleged Defamatory Political Remarks
16 Jun 2026
High Court Directs MHA to Reconsider Citizenship and Visa Plea for Deported Minor: J&K and Ladakh HC
25 Mar 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.