Case Law
2025-11-28
Subject: Education Law - Medical Admissions
JODHPUR: In a significant ruling providing relief to medical aspirants, the Rajasthan High Court has held that not studying Biology in Class 11 is not a ground to disqualify a candidate from NEET-UG admissions, provided they have passed the subject in Class 12, even as an additional subject.
The bench of Hon'ble Dr. Justice Nupur Bhati quashed the rejection of a meritorious student's candidature for an MBBS course and directed the authorities to grant him admission forthwith. The court found the rejection to be "unjust, arbitrary, and contrary to the decision of the National Medical Commission."
The petitioner, Gopal Singh, a high-scoring student with a 99.43 percentile in the NEET-UG 2025 examination, challenged the rejection of his admission to a government medical college. After being provisionally allotted a seat at Government Medical College, Sri Ganganagar, his candidature was cancelled via an email dated October 1, 2025.
The sole reason cited for the rejection was that he had not studied Biology as a subject in Class 11. Singh had initially completed his senior secondary education with Physics, Chemistry, and Mathematics. Aspiring for a medical career, he later reappeared for the Class 12 examination, taking Biology as an additional subject, and passed with a first division.
Petitioner's Counsel, Mr. Sharad Kothari, argued that the rejection was illegal and arbitrary. He drew the court's attention to a Public Notice issued by the National Medical Commission (NMC) on November 22, 2023. This notice, in line with the new Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2023, explicitly permits candidates who have passed Physics, Chemistry, and Biology/Biotechnology as additional subjects in Class 12 from a recognized board to appear for NEET-UG. He contended that the old rule requiring continuous study of Biology in both Classes 11 and 12 had been repealed.
Respondents' Counsel, Mr. Narendra Singh Rajpurohit (AAG), defended the decision, stating that the counseling checklist specifically required a Class 11 mark sheet showing Biology as a subject. He argued that the petitioner was aware of this requirement. The counsel also pointed to the NMC notice's phrasing, which allowed taking an additional subject "after passing Class 12th," suggesting it couldn't be done concurrently.
Justice Bhati meticulously examined the NMC's Public Notice and the Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2023. The court observed that the regulatory landscape had fundamentally changed, moving away from the rigid requirements of the erstwhile Medical Council of India (MCI).
The judgment highlighted pivotal excerpts from the NMC's notice:
> "The National Medical Commission in its meeting held on 14.06.2023... decided that the previous approach of the erstwhile Medical Council of India needs to be revisited by permitting candidates to undertaken study of the requisite subjects (Physics, Chemistry, Biology / Biotechnology alongwith English) even as additional subjects after passing Class 12th from duly recognized boards..."
The court identified a crucial inconsistency in the regulations' wording. It noted that the phrase "after passing Class 12th" appeared to be a "drafting error" and should be interpreted as "at the time of passing Class 12th." The court reasoned that no practical mechanism exists for a student to take an additional Class 12 subject once the qualification has already been awarded. The AAG was unable to provide any clarification on this point.
The court concluded unequivocally:
> "From the above it is abundantly clear that there is no requirement whatsoever to have studied Biology in Class 11th. The only requirement is that the candidate must have passed the requisite subjects i.e. Physics, Chemistry Biology/Biotechnology and English from a recognized board..."
The court held that the petitioner, having passed Biology as an additional subject in his Class 12 examination, fully satisfied the eligibility criteria laid down by the NMC.
Finding the rejection of Gopal Singh's candidature to be arbitrary, the High Court quashed and set aside the impugned email dated October 1, 2025.
Given that the petitioner had already been allotted a college in the third round of counseling pursuant to an interim court order, the bench issued a firm directive to the respondents to:
> "...accord the petitioner admission in the respective college forthwith and permit him to attend classes for the MBBS course."
This judgment clarifies the eligibility criteria under the new NMC regulations and ensures that a student's career prospects are not jeopardized by arbitrary interpretations of outdated or poorly drafted rules.
#NEETUG #MedicalAdmissions #RajasthanHighCourt
Thane Court Rejects Application to Dismiss Defamation Suit Against Digvijaya Singh Over RSS Remarks: Order VII Rule 11 CPC
06 Feb 2026
Ministry Revises Fees for Central Government Counsel Effective 2026
06 Feb 2026
Temporary Re-Employment Not Entitling Ex-Serviceman to Civil Pension: Punjab & Haryana HC
06 Feb 2026
High Courts Confirm Only 10% of Death Sentences Since 2016
06 Feb 2026
Finality in IPS Cadre Allocation Cannot Be Reopened After Decades: Supreme Court
06 Feb 2026
Patna HC Quashes Cognizance Against Minister Sans Assault Allegations
06 Feb 2026
Supreme Court Directs Trial Courts to Inform Accused of Legal Aid Rights Before Witness Examination
07 Feb 2026
Law Ministry Reveals 73% Upper Caste Judges Since 2021
07 Feb 2026
Dwivedi: British Geopolitics Created Pakistan, Not Jinnah
07 Feb 2026
The classification of land as 'Rasta' falls under the definition of 'public premises' in the eviction statute, thus the eviction proceedings initiated against unauthorized occupants are legally valid....
The main legal point established is that the retrospective cancellation of GST registration must be based on objective criteria and cannot be done mechanically. The proper officer must consider the c....
Disobedience of court orders, abuse of political power, and refusal to vacate the premises can lead to contempt of court proceedings and enforcement actions by law enforcement authorities.
Financial companies must seek relief through legal channels when police seize pledged items under allegations of theft, ensuring adherence to established guidelines and protocols.
The rights of a pledgee over pledged gold are limited to those of the pledger, and ownership must be established through civil proceedings, necessitating guidelines for handling pledged stolen gold.
Right to exemption from personal appearance in trials for handicapped individuals was upheld by the court.
The disposal of seized property without notice and due process violates constitutional rights, rendering such actions illegal and unconstitutional.
The main legal principle established is the authority of the Tendering Authority to waive non-essential tender conditions and the requirement for rational decision-making in such matters.
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.