Case Law
Subject : Litigation - Procedural Law
New Delhi – The Supreme Court of India has deferred the hearing in the significant case of Rajneesh Kumar Pandey & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. , scheduling it for the pronouncement of orders on March 6, 2025. The case, which has been pending since 2016, involves numerous parties and a complex web of applications, highlighting its wide-ranging implications.
A bench comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran presided over the hearing on Tuesday. The primary matter, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 132 of 2016, was heard along with several connected writ petitions and contempt petitions. The case docket reflects the matter's complexity, with a staggering number of interlocutory applications (IAs) filed for various reliefs, including impleadment, intervention, clarification, and directions.
The case appears to be a major service law dispute, as evidenced by the array of senior counsels representing different state governments, public bodies, and groups of individuals.
The record of proceedings from the hearing on March 4, 2025, underscores the procedural intricacy of the litigation. The bench was presented with dozens of applications, some dating back several years. The sheer volume of parties seeking to intervene or be impleaded suggests that the eventual outcome of the case will affect a large number of stakeholders across the country.
A battery of senior advocates, including Mr.
After hearing the arguments from the assembled counsel, the bench did not deliver a substantive ruling. Instead, the court passed a brief procedural order, stating:
"List on 06.03.2025 for orders."
This indicates that the court has concluded the hearing on the presented matters and will pronounce its decision or further directions on the specified future date.
The adjournment for orders means that all parties must now wait for the Supreme Court's formal pronouncement. Given the long history of the case and the numerous applications involved, the forthcoming orders are highly anticipated. They could potentially resolve several pending issues, provide clarity on the direction of the litigation, or deliver a final judgment on some of the key questions raised in the petitions. The decision will be closely watched by legal professionals and individuals involved in service law matters.
#SupremeCourt #ServiceLaw #Adjournment
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
CJI Declares Sikkim India's First Paperless Judiciary
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.