By Sai Teja , Legal News & Court Updates.
Add Sai Teja on Google
Case Law
Subject : Litigation - Procedural Law
New Delhi – The Supreme Court of India has deferred the hearing in the significant case of Rajneesh Kumar Pandey & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. , scheduling it for the pronouncement of orders on March 6, 2025. The case, which has been pending since 2016, involves numerous parties and a complex web of applications, highlighting its wide-ranging implications.
A bench comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran presided over the hearing on Tuesday. The primary matter, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 132 of 2016, was heard along with several connected writ petitions and contempt petitions. The case docket reflects the matter's complexity, with a staggering number of interlocutory applications (IAs) filed for various reliefs, including impleadment, intervention, clarification, and directions.
The case appears to be a major service law dispute, as evidenced by the array of senior counsels representing different state governments, public bodies, and groups of individuals.
The record of proceedings from the hearing on March 4, 2025, underscores the procedural intricacy of the litigation. The bench was presented with dozens of applications, some dating back several years. The sheer volume of parties seeking to intervene or be impleaded suggests that the eventual outcome of the case will affect a large number of stakeholders across the country.
A battery of senior advocates, including Mr.
After hearing the arguments from the assembled counsel, the bench did not deliver a substantive ruling. Instead, the court passed a brief procedural order, stating:
"List on 06.03.2025 for orders."
This indicates that the court has concluded the hearing on the presented matters and will pronounce its decision or further directions on the specified future date.
The adjournment for orders means that all parties must now wait for the Supreme Court's formal pronouncement. Given the long history of the case and the numerous applications involved, the forthcoming orders are highly anticipated. They could potentially resolve several pending issues, provide clarity on the direction of the litigation, or deliver a final judgment on some of the key questions raised in the petitions. The decision will be closely watched by legal professionals and individuals involved in service law matters.
#SupremeCourt #ServiceLaw #Adjournment
Kerala High Court Salutes R. Rajesh's Supreme Sacrifice, Urges Vigilance in Kochi Flood Prevention
08 Aug 2026
Supreme Court Backs Balanced Calcutta High Court Order on TMC Frozen Accounts in ED Probe
12 Aug 2026
Subsisting Contract Cannot Create Continuing Cause of Action for Time-Barred Debt: Supreme Court
13 Aug 2026
Supreme Court Records Centre's Assurance That Pre-2026 Transgender Identity Cards Stay Valid
17 Aug 2026
Allahabad High Court Grants Bail to Javed Akhtar in GST ITC Fraud Case, Citing Undue Delay
19 Aug 2026
SC Collegium Recommends Appointing Advocate, Judicial Officer to Gauhati High Court
19 Aug 2026
Supreme Court Rules Caste Abuse Inside Closed Room Not Public View Under SC/ST Act
21 Aug 2026
Bombay High Court Pulls Up BMC for Defying Assurance on Bandra Football Ground
21 Aug 2026
RPNLUP Denies Recruitment Irregularities, Files Police Complaint Amid State Law Department Inquiry
21 Aug 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.