Case Law
Subject : Litigation - Procedural Law
New Delhi – The Supreme Court of India has deferred the hearing in the significant case of Rajneesh Kumar Pandey & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. , scheduling it for the pronouncement of orders on March 6, 2025. The case, which has been pending since 2016, involves numerous parties and a complex web of applications, highlighting its wide-ranging implications.
A bench comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran presided over the hearing on Tuesday. The primary matter, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 132 of 2016, was heard along with several connected writ petitions and contempt petitions. The case docket reflects the matter's complexity, with a staggering number of interlocutory applications (IAs) filed for various reliefs, including impleadment, intervention, clarification, and directions.
The case appears to be a major service law dispute, as evidenced by the array of senior counsels representing different state governments, public bodies, and groups of individuals.
The record of proceedings from the hearing on March 4, 2025, underscores the procedural intricacy of the litigation. The bench was presented with dozens of applications, some dating back several years. The sheer volume of parties seeking to intervene or be impleaded suggests that the eventual outcome of the case will affect a large number of stakeholders across the country.
A battery of senior advocates, including Mr.
After hearing the arguments from the assembled counsel, the bench did not deliver a substantive ruling. Instead, the court passed a brief procedural order, stating:
"List on 06.03.2025 for orders."
This indicates that the court has concluded the hearing on the presented matters and will pronounce its decision or further directions on the specified future date.
The adjournment for orders means that all parties must now wait for the Supreme Court's formal pronouncement. Given the long history of the case and the numerous applications involved, the forthcoming orders are highly anticipated. They could potentially resolve several pending issues, provide clarity on the direction of the litigation, or deliver a final judgment on some of the key questions raised in the petitions. The decision will be closely watched by legal professionals and individuals involved in service law matters.
#SupremeCourt #ServiceLaw #Adjournment
Delayed Registration of Birth Certificate Without Statutory Compliance Is Not Proof of Minority: Sikkim High Court
12 Jun 2026
Personal Participation in Contract Work Creates Employer-Employee Tie Under Employees Compensation Act: Kerala High Court
12 Jun 2026
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Rajya Sabha Nomination Rejection
12 Jun 2026
Insufficient Evidence to Prove Minority or Kidnapping: Gujarat High Court Acquits Two in Atrocity Act Case
29 Jan 2026
Ex-Parte Order Without Notice or Jurisdiction Constitutes 'Gross Abuse of Process': Rajasthan High Court
15 Jun 2026
Mandatory Administrative Enquiry Precedes FIR Against Public Servants Under SC/ST Act: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Assigning Administrative Charges to Tainted Officials Violates Natural Justice: MP High Court Quashes PWD Order
16 Jun 2026
Outsourced Employees Lack Right to Promotion; Unauthorized Designation Upgrades Are Legally Void: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Calcutta HC Questions Speaker’s Power to Appoint LoP
16 Jun 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.