Case Law
Subject : Civil Law - Constitutional Law
Description :
New Delhi, March 4, 2025
– The Supreme Court of India, in a hearing today, adjourned the petitions filed by
The matter arises from Special Leave Petitions (SLP(C) Nos. 2353-2354/2025) challenging a judgment by the High Court for The State of Telangana at Hyderabad dated November 22, 2024. These petitions are related to Writ Petition (c) No. 82/2025.
During previous hearings, the Supreme Court had explored the possibility of the Speaker of the Telangana State Legislative Assembly providing a timeline for deciding the matter, aiming to potentially avoid judicial intervention. However, the Secretary of the Telangana State Legislative Assembly indicated that no such statement could be made on behalf of the Speaker.
Today’s hearing saw Senior Counsels C. Aryama Sundaram and
Acknowledging the technicality but emphasizing principles of natural justice, the Supreme Court bench decided to adjourn the proceedings. The court order stated:
> “No doubt that the objection is hypertechnical, however we propose to adjourn the matter so that no objection is raised at a subsequent point of time by the respondents that the petitions were decided without following the principles of natural justice.”
The court proceeded to issue formal notices to the respondents in both the SLP and the Writ Petition. The notices are returnable on March 25, 2025 .
Notably, Ms. Devina Sehgal, learned counsel, waived the requirement of formal notice for the State of Telangana, and Shri Sravan Kumar Karanam, learned counsel, waived it for the Legislative Assembly.
For the remaining respondents, the court directed service through the Registrar (Judicial) of the High Court of Telangana, instructing them to ensure service is completed before the returnable date. The order also clarified that respondents are expected to complete their pleadings before March 25, 2025.
The matters are now scheduled to be taken up on March 25, 2025, at Serial No. 1 in the court's list. This adjournment underscores the Supreme Court's commitment to procedural fairness and ensuring all parties have adequate opportunity to respond in legal proceedings, even when objections appear technical in nature.
#SupremeCourt #ProceduralLaw #LegalNews #SupremeCourtSupremeCourt
Supreme Court Rules Criminal Courts Must Not Act As Recovery Agents For Disputed Dues
27 Jul 2026
Rajya Sabha Bill Seeks To Criminalize Vande Mataram Disruption Under The National Honour Act
27 Jul 2026
Will Competitive Exams Deplete Delhi District Courts of Judges During Crucial Trial Proceedings This Year?
27 Jul 2026
Bombay High Court Adjourns Defamation Case Involving Union Minister Nitin Gadkari And Online Media Platforms
28 Jul 2026
Rajasthan High Court Directs State to Form Separate Wings for Crime Investigation and Security
28 Jul 2026
Gujarat High Court Upholds Constitutionality Of CGST Section 16 2 c Denying Unpaid Input Tax
28 Jul 2026
Punjab and Haryana High Court Issues New Guidelines For Legal Aid Defense Counsel System
28 Jul 2026
Government Introduces Public Examinations Amendment Bill 2026 In Lok Sabha To Curb Exam Paper Leaks
28 Jul 2026
Should Delhi High Court Increase Pecuniary Jurisdiction of District Courts to ₹10 Crore Threshold?
28 Jul 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.