The Supreme Court Collegium has officially recommended the elevation of nine advocates to the bench of the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, marking a pivotal development in addressing the persistent judicial vacancies within the region. The decision, finalized during a meeting held on October 29, 2026, aims to bolster the strength of the High Court, which currently operates with only 14 sitting judges against a sanctioned capacity of 25.

The list of proposed appointees includes Vishal Sharma, Vikram Kumar Sharma, Namgyal Wangchuk, Pawan Kumar Kundal, Tahir Majid Shamsi, Tabasum Zafar, Amit Gupta, Pranav Kohli, and Anupam Raina. This cohort of nine, if cleared by the Union Government, will represent a significant advancement toward filling the 11 vacancies currently hindering the administration of justice. Notably, the recommendation of Namgyal Wangchuk provides specific judicial representation for the Union Territory of Ladakh, while the inclusion of Tabasum Zafar is widely anticipated to mark a historic milestone, as she would become the first Kashmiri woman lawyer to serve as a judge in this High Court.

Addressing Regional Representation and Diversity The current selection process follows an initial proposal made in April 2026 by the High Court Collegium, then under the leadership of Chief Justice Arun Palli. That original recommendation had put forward eleven names—ten from the Bar quota and one from the Bench quota. The judicial officer identified in that earlier proposal, Yash Paul Bourney, received formal approval from the Supreme Court Collegium on September 10 and was subsequently notified for appointment by the Union Government on September 19.

The nine newly recommended advocates are the result of a rigorous filtering process applied to the original Bar quota candidates. While the High Court had recommended ten individuals for elevation under this category, the Supreme Court Collegium has opted to proceed with nine. Among those originally recommended but ultimately omitted from the final approved list is Senior Advocate Jahangir Iqbal Ganai, who served as the Advocate General of Jammu & Kashmir between June 2016 and July 2018. The Collegium has maintained silence regarding the specific reasons for this omission, adhering to its established practice of not disclosing deliberations on individual non-selections.

Streamlining the Judicial Pipeline The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh remains under significant pressure due to its substantial caseload. With a sanctioned strength of 19 permanent judges and six additional judges, the current working strength of 14 has necessitated a focus on efficient vacancy management. The endorsement of these nine candidates is viewed as an essential step toward restoring the full operational capacity of the institution.

The process of appointment to the higher judiciary involves extensive consultation between the High Court Collegium and the Supreme Court Collegium, followed by final clearance from the Union Government. The recent publication of the Collegium’s statement on the Supreme Court’s official portal signals the completion of the preliminary stage of the vetting process. The focus now shifts to the Ministry of Law and Justice, which will facilitate the final warrants of appointment.

Continuity and Future Impact The move toward these nine appointments follows a period of transition within the legal landscape of the region. As the court moves to integrate these professionals into the judicial fold, the legal community remains observant of the impact this expansion will have on the pendency of cases. By selecting candidates who possess diverse expertise and regional representation, the Collegium aims to enhance the credibility and accessibility of the judicial process in both Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh.

While the administrative details of the appointment dates are yet to be notified, the procedural framework for these elevations is now firmly in place. Once the formal notifications are issued by the executive branch, these nine advocates will transition into their roles as judges, completing a lengthy process initiated earlier this year. The judiciary now awaits the finalization of these appointments to address the long-standing shortfall in judicial personnel, ensuring that the High Court is better equipped to handle its mandate in the coming years. The ongoing integration of these candidates serves as the current focal point for the legal establishment in the Union Territory.