Back
Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Transfer of Two Orissa High Court Judges to Gujarat and Chhattisgarh
The Collegium, meeting on , has recommended the transfer of two judges from the to other High Courts—a move that underscores the ongoing administrative restructuring within India's judiciary. Justice Manash Ranjan Pathak is slated for transfer to the , while Justice Krushna Ram Mohapatra has been proposed for the . These recommendations, subject to the approval of the , are part of the Collegium's broader exercise to balance judicial workloads and enhance efficiency across the country's High Courts.
The decision comes at a time when the is already functioning with a significant shortfall in its . Against a of 33 judges, the court currently operates with only 17 judges, including the Chief Justice. With these two transfers, the number would further dip to 15, raising concerns about mounting pendency and the strain on judicial infrastructure in the state. Legal observers note that while transfers are routine, the cumulative effect on a court already struggling with vacancies merits careful attention from the .
A Closer Look at the Two Recommended Transfers
Justice Manash Ranjan Pathak, whose parent High Court is Gauhati, brings a diverse judicial career to his prospective posting at the . Before his elevation to the bench, he served as Standing Counsel for the Education Department, , and also for the since . He was appointed as an Additional Judge of the on , and became a permanent judge on . He has been serving at the since , after a prior transfer. His move to Gujarat—one of the busiest High Courts in the country—is expected to help address the caseload there, though it further depletes Orissa's roster.
Justice Krushna Ram Mohapatra, who has been recommended for transfer to the , has an equally distinguished pre-bench career. Prior to his elevation, he served as Additional Standing Counsel for Odisha and the , and also represented institutions like , Keonjhar, the under the , and . He was elevated as a Judge of the on . His transfer will bring a seasoned judge to the , which has also been managing with a notable vacancy rate.
The Collegium's Wider Decisions: Elevations to Chief Justiceship
In the same meeting, the Collegium also recommended the elevation of four judges as Chief Justices of High Courts. Justice V. Kameswar Rao, from the , has been proposed for the ; Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge of the for the ; Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi of the for the ; and Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra of the for the same court (as Chief Justice). These elevations, if approved, will bring experienced judges to helm some of the most litigious High Courts in India.
The simultaneous recommendations reflect the Collegium's proactive approach in addressing leadership vacancies and managerial needs across the judiciary. While transfers and elevations are distinct processes, both fall under the constitutional framework that vests the final say in the President (acting on the advice of the ) after receiving the Chief Justice of India's recommendation.
The Constitutional and Administrative Framework
The transfer of High Court judges is governed by , which allows the President, after consultation with the Chief Justice of India, to transfer a judge from one High Court to another. The Collegium—comprising the Chief Justice of India and four senior-most judges of the —has the primary role in initiating such proposals. The system, evolved through judicial pronouncements like the Second and Third Judges Cases, mandates that transfers are made , ensuring impartiality and better management of judicial resources.
One of the key rationales behind transfers is to expose judges to different legal ecosystems, curb regional biases, and promote national integration among the judiciary. However, transfers also impose personal and logistical challenges on the judges and their families. The Collegium's recommendations are thus made after considering the individual's consent, administrative requirements, and the needs of both the transferring and receiving courts.
A Critical Assessment of the Orissa High Court's Capacity
The 's current strength of 17 judges against a of 33 is a stark reminder of the persistent vacancy crisis plaguing many High Courts in India. The retirements, elevations, and now transfers further strain the court's ability to dispose of cases in a timely manner. As of 2026, the court is burdened with over 2.5 lakh pending cases, a figure that continues to grow. The transfer of two judges will undoubtedly exacerbate the situation, unless swift appointments are made to fill the gaps.
Legal experts suggest that the should expedite the process of appointing new judges to to mitigate the impact. The government has often been criticized for delays in judicial appointments, leading to a backlog that undermines the public's access to justice. While the transfer recommendations are a positive administrative step, they must be matched with a robust recruitment drive.
Implications for the Legal Community
For practicing lawyers, the transfer of judges can bring sudden changes in court procedures and case allocation. Judges who have built expertise in local laws may take time to adapt to new jurisdictions, but they also bring fresh perspectives. The , with a high volume of commercial and constitutional matters, will benefit from Justice Pathak's experience in service law and taxation. Similarly, Justice Mohapatra's exposure to cooperative bank litigation and administrative law will be an asset for the .
The legal community will also be watching how these transfers affect ongoing cases. In Orissa, lawyers may face adjournments as cases are reassigned to new benches. However, the High Court registry is expected to manage case lists efficiently. Meanwhile, the elevation of four judges to Chief Justiceship is a significant development, as Chief Justices play a pivotal role in court administration and policy.
Conclusion
The Collegium's recommendation to transfer two judges is a routine yet consequential administrative decision. It underscores the delicate balance between managing judicial resources and ensuring the efficient dispensation of justice. As the reviews these proposals, the legal fraternity awaits final notifications. The impact on 's functioning, however, cannot be ignored. It is imperative that the government acts swiftly to fill vacancies and ensure that justice is not delayed for litigants in Odisha. The deliberations of the Collegium reflect a broader effort to strengthen the judiciary's institutional health, but the success of such measures hinges on timely implementation and adequate support from all stakeholderS.
