Case Law
Subject : Civil Procedure - Limitation Act
New Delhi – The Supreme Court of India is set to hear an interlocutory application concerning a plea for the condonation of delay in a case involving Santosh Gosain and M/S Beli Ram Sareen & Anr. The application, registered as IA No. 196741/2025, requests the court to excuse a delay in filing, a crucial first step before the main arguments of the case can be heard.
The matter, titled Santosh Gosain vs M/S Beli Ram Sareen & Anr. , has been brought before the nation's apex court. The current focus is not on the primary dispute between the parties but on a procedural hurdle. The petitioner, Santosh Gosain, is seeking the court's permission to proceed with their case despite having missed the statutory deadline for filing the necessary legal documents.
In the Indian legal system, laws such as the Limitation Act, 1963, prescribe specific time limits within which legal actions must be initiated or appeals filed. This is done to ensure timely justice and prevent the indefinite threat of litigation.
However, the law also recognizes that delays can occur due to genuine and unavoidable reasons. An application for "condonation of delay" is a formal request made to a court to overlook such a delay. The applicant must provide a "sufficient cause" that prevented them from adhering to the deadline. The court possesses discretionary power to accept or reject this plea based on the merits of the explanation provided.
The Supreme Court will now examine the reasons cited by Santosh Gosain for the delay in filing. The court will assess whether the cause shown is sufficient to warrant a condonation.
The outcome of this interlocutory application is critical. If the court condones the delay, the case will proceed to be heard on its substantive merits. Conversely, if the court dismisses the application, it will effectively close the door on the petitioner's current legal recourse before the Supreme Court, as their filing would be considered time-barred. The decision on this procedural matter will determine the future trajectory of the legal battle between the parties.
#SupremeCourt #CondonationOfDelay #CivilProcedure
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.