Supreme Court Appointments
Subject : Constitutional Law - Judicial Appointments
The central government on Tuesday notified the appointments of Justices N. Kotiswar Singh and R.Mahadevan to the Supreme Court, following the recommendations made by the Supreme Court collegium.
This marks a historic moment, as Justice Singh 's elevation makes him the first judge from the state of Manipur to be appointed to the apex court, more than 70 years after India gained independence.
The Supreme Court collegium, led by Chief Justice of India Dhananjaya Y.
Representation for the North-East
In its resolution, the collegium stated that Justice Singh 's appointment "will provide representation to the North-East, and in particular he will be the first judge from the state of Manipur to be appointed as a judge of the Supreme Court."
Justice Singh , who was appointed as the Chief Justice of the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court in February 2023, started his judicial career as an additional judge of the Gauhati High Court in October 2011. The collegium noted that he has "an impeccable record, both in judicial capacity and in terms of the work which has been rendered by him on the administrative side."
Diversity on the Bench
The second appointee, Justice R.Mahadevan , belongs to a backward community from Tamil Nadu. The collegium noted that his appointment would bring diversity to the Supreme Court bench.
The resolution explained that the collegium gave precedence to Justice
Restoring the Supreme Court's Full Strength
With these two appointments, the Supreme Court has now reached its full sanctioned strength of 34 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The recent retirements in April and May had left the court operating with 32 judges, two short of its full strength.
The collegium's timely recommendations and the central government's quick approval have ensured that the Supreme Court is now functioning at its full capacity.
Involvement of the CRP
In April 2023, Chief Justice
Challenges in the Appointment Process
The Supreme Court collegium puts out some basic reasons as a rationale for the appointments or transfers it recommends. However, the Memorandum of Procedure (MoP), a guidebook of understanding between the Supreme Court collegium and the central government, does not bind the government to a timeline to respond. The government can simply sit on the collegium's recommendations, as has been the case in the past.
The timely appointments of Justices
Singh
and
Supreme Court appointments - Judicial representation - North-East representation - Seniority and merit-based selection - Diversity on the bench - Collegium system - Memorandum of Procedure - Centre-Judiciary relations
#SupremeCourt #JudicialAppointments #NortheastRepresentation
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.