Case Law
Subject : Law - Criminal Law
New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India has granted interim bail to an accused in a money laundering case, citing his severe medical conditions which bring him within the ambit of the 'sick or infirm' proviso under Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA).
A bench comprising
Chief Justice
D.Y. Chandrachud
, Justice
J.B. Pardiwala
, and Justice
Manoj Misra
ordered the release of
The petitioner had initially moved a second application for bail on medical grounds before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, which was dismissed by an order dated August 9, 2024. Following this, the petitioner approached the Supreme Court.
On September 2, 2024, the Supreme Court issued notice in the matter. Subsequently, on October 4, 2024, the Court directed a fresh medical evaluation of the petitioner by a team of specialists at the Sir J J Group of Hospitals, Mumbai.
A Medical Board, consisting of heads of the Departments of Neurology, Cardiology, Nephrology, and Ophthalmology, submitted a detailed report on October 10, 2024. The report outlined the petitioner's serious health issues:
The Medical Board's opinion concluded that the patient has "severe Diabetic neuropathy with chronic kidney disease stage IV with uncontrolled blood sugars with ischemic heart disease with proliferative diabetic retinopathy," requires regular medication, assistance for daily living, and continuous follow-up with multiple specialists.
The Supreme Court highlighted that the proviso to Section 45(1) of the PMLA specifically allows for the release on bail of a person who "is sick or infirm" if the Special Court so directs.
Considering the petitioner's age (67 years), the duration of custody (nearly a year and three months), and most significantly, the comprehensive medical evaluation report from Sir J J Group of Hospitals, the Court found that the petitioner's condition fulfilled the necessary threshold for being granted bail under this proviso.
The Court, therefore, directed that the petitioner,
The Special Leave Petition was accordingly disposed of.
This decision underscores the significance of the 'sick or infirm' proviso in Section 45(1) of the PMLA, providing a crucial exception to the stringent bail conditions imposed by the Act based on verified medical grounds.
#PMLA #Bail #SupremeCourt #SupremeCourtSupremeCourt
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.