By Sai Teja , Legal News & Court Updates.
Add Sai Teja on Google
judgement
Subject : Constitutional Law - Scheduled Castes and Tribes
The case involved a challenge to a notification issued by the Bihar government in 2015, which sought to merge the 'Tanti-Tantwa' caste with the 'Pan/Sawasi' caste, which is listed as a Scheduled Caste in the state. The move was based on the recommendation of the State Backward Commission, which claimed that 'Tanti-Tantwa' was synonymous with 'Pan/Sawasi'.
The appellants argued that the state government had no authority to make such a change to the Scheduled Castes list, as per the provisions of Article 341 of the Constitution. They contended that any amendment to the Scheduled Castes list can only be made by an act of Parliament, not by a state government.
The state government, on the other hand, argued that the notification was merely a clarification and did not amount to an amendment to the Scheduled Castes list. They claimed that 'Tanti-Tantwa' was already a part of the 'Pan/Sawasi' caste and that the notification was intended to extend the benefits of
The Supreme Court rejected the state government's arguments, holding that the notification was clearly an attempt to tinker with the Scheduled Castes list, which is beyond the state's constitutional powers. The court emphasized that Article 341 of the Constitution is clear that any inclusion or exclusion of a caste from the Scheduled Castes list can only be done through an act of Parliament, and not by a state government.
The court also noted that the state government was aware of its lack of authority, as it had previously approached the central government in 2011 to include 'Tanti-Tantwa' in the Scheduled Castes list, but the request was not accepted.
The Supreme Court quashed the Bihar government's notification dated July 1, 2015, holding that it was unconstitutional and beyond the state's powers. The court directed the state to return the posts reserved for Scheduled Castes that were filled by members of the 'Tanti-Tantwa' community under the impugned notification, and to accommodate them under the Extremely Backward Classes category instead.
The judgment is a significant victory for the principles of federalism and the constitutional safeguards for Scheduled Castes, as it upholds the exclusive power of Parliament to make changes to the Scheduled Castes list.
#ScheduledCastes #ConstitutionalLaw #CasteReservations #SupremeCourtSupremeCourt
Kerala High Court Salutes R. Rajesh's Supreme Sacrifice, Urges Vigilance in Kochi Flood Prevention
08 Aug 2026
Supreme Court Backs Balanced Calcutta High Court Order on TMC Frozen Accounts in ED Probe
12 Aug 2026
Subsisting Contract Cannot Create Continuing Cause of Action for Time-Barred Debt: Supreme Court
13 Aug 2026
Supreme Court Records Centre's Assurance That Pre-2026 Transgender Identity Cards Stay Valid
17 Aug 2026
Allahabad High Court Grants Bail to Javed Akhtar in GST ITC Fraud Case, Citing Undue Delay
19 Aug 2026
SC Collegium Recommends Appointing Advocate, Judicial Officer to Gauhati High Court
19 Aug 2026
Supreme Court Rules Caste Abuse Inside Closed Room Not Public View Under SC/ST Act
21 Aug 2026
Bombay High Court Pulls Up BMC for Defying Assurance on Bandra Football Ground
21 Aug 2026
RPNLUP Denies Recruitment Irregularities, Files Police Complaint Amid State Law Department Inquiry
21 Aug 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.