Regulation of Political Advertising and Campaign Tactics
Subject : Constitutional Law - Election Law
Supreme Court Refuses BJP's Plea Against HC Order on 'Disparaging' Election Ads
In a significant development, the Supreme Court on Monday declined to entertain a petition filed by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) against a Calcutta High Court order that refused to interfere with a single-judge verdict directing the party not to publish any advertisement violating the Model Code of Conduct during the Lok Sabha election.
A vacation bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and KV Viswanathan refused to interfere with the high court order, stating that the advertisements were 'prima facie disparaging'.
"We have seen the advertisements. Prima facie, the advertisements are disparaging. You can say you are the best... but...we don't want to lend our hands to promote further acrimony," Justice Viswanathan said.
The BJP had published at least four advertisements in vernacular dailies, portraying the ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC) party as corrupt and one that is against the Hindus and claiming that women are not safe under the present regime. The TMC had filed multiple complaints with the Election Commission (EC) and later moved the high court after alleged inaction by the poll body.
The Calcutta High Court had earlier pulled up the EC for its 'gross failure' to address complaints about the 'derogatory' advertisements published by the BJP against the TMC in West Bengal, and restrained the opposition party from carrying out materials that are in violation of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC).
The Supreme Court's decision to refuse to entertain the BJP's plea is a significant victory for the TMC and a setback for the BJP's campaign tactics in the state. The court's observation that 'your rival is not your enemy' underscores the importance of maintaining a healthy and constructive political discourse during elections.
The BJP has now been granted liberty to approach the Calcutta High Court to contest the notices issued by the single-judge bench, but the Supreme Court's refusal to interfere with the high court order is a clear message that the judiciary will not tolerate blatant violations of the MCC and attempts to sway voters through 'disparaging' advertisements.
political advertising - election campaign tactics - model code of conduct violations - judicial oversight of elections - political discourse and acrimony - balance between political rivals
#LegalNews #ElectionAds #ModelCodeOfConduct
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
CJI Declares Sikkim India's First Paperless Judiciary
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.