Regulation of Political Advertising and Campaign Tactics
Subject : Constitutional Law - Election Law
Supreme Court Refuses BJP's Plea Against HC Order on 'Disparaging' Election Ads
In a significant development, the Supreme Court on Monday declined to entertain a petition filed by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) against a Calcutta High Court order that refused to interfere with a single-judge verdict directing the party not to publish any advertisement violating the Model Code of Conduct during the Lok Sabha election.
A vacation bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and KV Viswanathan refused to interfere with the high court order, stating that the advertisements were 'prima facie disparaging'.
"We have seen the advertisements. Prima facie, the advertisements are disparaging. You can say you are the best... but...we don't want to lend our hands to promote further acrimony," Justice Viswanathan said.
The BJP had published at least four advertisements in vernacular dailies, portraying the ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC) party as corrupt and one that is against the Hindus and claiming that women are not safe under the present regime. The TMC had filed multiple complaints with the Election Commission (EC) and later moved the high court after alleged inaction by the poll body.
The Calcutta High Court had earlier pulled up the EC for its 'gross failure' to address complaints about the 'derogatory' advertisements published by the BJP against the TMC in West Bengal, and restrained the opposition party from carrying out materials that are in violation of the Model Code of Conduct (MCC).
The Supreme Court's decision to refuse to entertain the BJP's plea is a significant victory for the TMC and a setback for the BJP's campaign tactics in the state. The court's observation that 'your rival is not your enemy' underscores the importance of maintaining a healthy and constructive political discourse during elections.
The BJP has now been granted liberty to approach the Calcutta High Court to contest the notices issued by the single-judge bench, but the Supreme Court's refusal to interfere with the high court order is a clear message that the judiciary will not tolerate blatant violations of the MCC and attempts to sway voters through 'disparaging' advertisements.
political advertising - election campaign tactics - model code of conduct violations - judicial oversight of elections - political discourse and acrimony - balance between political rivals
#LegalNews #ElectionAds #ModelCodeOfConduct
Ponraj Challenges FIR Over Alleged Defamatory Political Remarks
16 Jun 2026
Outsourced Employees Lack Right to Promotion; Unauthorized Designation Upgrades Are Legally Void: Uttarakhand High Court
16 Jun 2026
Assigning Administrative Charges to Tainted Officials Violates Natural Justice: MP High Court Quashes PWD Order
16 Jun 2026
SC Rules Walking on Footpaths is Fundamental Right
19 Jun 2026
Senior Citizens Act Cannot Be Invoked for Title Disputes Unless Section 23 Applies: Allahabad High Court
04 Jul 2026
Vague And Nebulous Allegations Do Not Warrant Judicial Interference In Policy Matters: Patna High Court
04 Jul 2026
12-Year Possession Mandatory To Resist Land Eviction: Jharkhand HC
04 Jul 2026
Advocates Have No Right to Demand Out-Of-Turn Listing of Cases: Madras High Court
07 Jul 2026
Delhi High Court Examines Personality Rights in Cricket Lawsuit
07 Jul 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.