Case Law
Subject : Civil Law - Writ Petition
New Delhi: In a procedural development at the Supreme Court of India, the Registrar's Court has permitted the withdrawal of four unregistered applications filed in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) initiated by advocate and BJP leader Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay.
The order, dated July 15, 2025, was passed by Registrar Sh. Mashroor Alam Khan in connection with Writ Petition (Civil) No. 559 of 2020.
The case, titled Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay vs Union of India & Ors. , saw a brief hearing before the Registrar's Court. The primary focus of the day's proceedings was a request made by Mr. Shivank Verma, an Applicant-in-Person.
According to the official Record of Proceedings, Mr. Verma sought to withdraw four unregistered Interlocutory Applications (IAs):
* IA No. 106756 of 2020 (Intervention Application)
* IA No. 106757 of 2020 (Permission to Appear and Argue in Person)
* IA No. 11299 of 2021 (Intervention Application)
* IA No. 11302 of 2021 (Permission to Appear and Argue in Person)
The Registrar's order was concise and dispositive. After noting the request, Registrar Khan passed the following order:
"As per Office report, Mr. Shivank Verma, Applicant-in-Person seeks withdrawal of unregistered application nos. 106756 of 2020, 106757 of 2020, 11299 of 2021 and 11302 of 2021. As sought, unregistered applications are hereby allowed to be withdrawn."
This order formally closes these specific applications, removing them from the case record.
While the order does not delve into the merits of the main PIL, it represents a routine but necessary step in case management. The withdrawal of intervention applications simplifies the list of parties and arguments that the Supreme Court bench will eventually hear when the main petition is taken up. The reasons for Mr. Verma's withdrawal were not detailed in the Registrar's order.
The principal petition, filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, remains pending before the Supreme Court, with the Union of India as the primary respondent. The case will proceed for hearing on the substantive legal questions raised in the PIL in due course.
#SupremeCourt #PIL #CivilProcedure
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Belated Challenge by Non-Bidders to GeM Tender Conditions for School Sports Equipment Not Maintainable: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.