Case Law
Subject : Civil Law - Writ Petition
Description :
New Delhi: In a procedural development at the Supreme Court of India, the Registrar's Court has permitted the withdrawal of four unregistered applications filed in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) initiated by advocate and BJP leader Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay.
The order, dated July 15, 2025, was passed by Registrar Sh. Mashroor Alam Khan in connection with Writ Petition (Civil) No. 559 of 2020.
The case, titled Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay vs Union of India & Ors. , saw a brief hearing before the Registrar's Court. The primary focus of the day's proceedings was a request made by Mr. Shivank Verma, an Applicant-in-Person.
According to the official Record of Proceedings, Mr. Verma sought to withdraw four unregistered Interlocutory Applications (IAs):
* IA No. 106756 of 2020 (Intervention Application)
* IA No. 106757 of 2020 (Permission to Appear and Argue in Person)
* IA No. 11299 of 2021 (Intervention Application)
* IA No. 11302 of 2021 (Permission to Appear and Argue in Person)
The Registrar's order was concise and dispositive. After noting the request, Registrar Khan passed the following order:
"As per Office report, Mr. Shivank Verma, Applicant-in-Person seeks withdrawal of unregistered application nos. 106756 of 2020, 106757 of 2020, 11299 of 2021 and 11302 of 2021. As sought, unregistered applications are hereby allowed to be withdrawn."
This order formally closes these specific applications, removing them from the case record.
While the order does not delve into the merits of the main PIL, it represents a routine but necessary step in case management. The withdrawal of intervention applications simplifies the list of parties and arguments that the Supreme Court bench will eventually hear when the main petition is taken up. The reasons for Mr. Verma's withdrawal were not detailed in the Registrar's order.
The principal petition, filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, remains pending before the Supreme Court, with the Union of India as the primary respondent. The case will proceed for hearing on the substantive legal questions raised in the PIL in due course.
#SupremeCourt #PIL #CivilProcedure
Rajya Sabha Bill Seeks To Criminalize Vande Mataram Disruption Under The National Honour Act
27 Jul 2026
Will Competitive Exams Deplete Delhi District Courts of Judges During Crucial Trial Proceedings This Year?
27 Jul 2026
Bombay High Court Adjourns Defamation Case Involving Union Minister Nitin Gadkari And Online Media Platforms
28 Jul 2026
Rajasthan High Court Directs State to Form Separate Wings for Crime Investigation and Security
28 Jul 2026
Gujarat High Court Upholds Constitutionality Of CGST Section 16 2 c Denying Unpaid Input Tax
28 Jul 2026
Punjab and Haryana High Court Issues New Guidelines For Legal Aid Defense Counsel System
28 Jul 2026
Government Introduces Public Examinations Amendment Bill 2026 In Lok Sabha To Curb Exam Paper Leaks
28 Jul 2026
Should Delhi High Court Increase Pecuniary Jurisdiction of District Courts to ₹10 Crore Threshold?
28 Jul 2026
Government Disclosure Reveals Urgent Staffing Crisis Across Numerous Regional Armed Forces Tribunal India Benches
29 Jul 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.