Case Law
Subject : Civil Law - Writ Petition
New Delhi: In a procedural development at the Supreme Court of India, the Registrar's Court has permitted the withdrawal of four unregistered applications filed in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) initiated by advocate and BJP leader Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay.
The order, dated July 15, 2025, was passed by Registrar Sh. Mashroor Alam Khan in connection with Writ Petition (Civil) No. 559 of 2020.
The case, titled Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay vs Union of India & Ors. , saw a brief hearing before the Registrar's Court. The primary focus of the day's proceedings was a request made by Mr. Shivank Verma, an Applicant-in-Person.
According to the official Record of Proceedings, Mr. Verma sought to withdraw four unregistered Interlocutory Applications (IAs):
* IA No. 106756 of 2020 (Intervention Application)
* IA No. 106757 of 2020 (Permission to Appear and Argue in Person)
* IA No. 11299 of 2021 (Intervention Application)
* IA No. 11302 of 2021 (Permission to Appear and Argue in Person)
The Registrar's order was concise and dispositive. After noting the request, Registrar Khan passed the following order:
"As per Office report, Mr. Shivank Verma, Applicant-in-Person seeks withdrawal of unregistered application nos. 106756 of 2020, 106757 of 2020, 11299 of 2021 and 11302 of 2021. As sought, unregistered applications are hereby allowed to be withdrawn."
This order formally closes these specific applications, removing them from the case record.
While the order does not delve into the merits of the main PIL, it represents a routine but necessary step in case management. The withdrawal of intervention applications simplifies the list of parties and arguments that the Supreme Court bench will eventually hear when the main petition is taken up. The reasons for Mr. Verma's withdrawal were not detailed in the Registrar's order.
The principal petition, filed by Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, remains pending before the Supreme Court, with the Union of India as the primary respondent. The case will proceed for hearing on the substantive legal questions raised in the PIL in due course.
#SupremeCourt #PIL #CivilProcedure
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
CJI Declares Sikkim India's First Paperless Judiciary
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.