Subject :
O R D E R
Delay condoned.
2. Heard Mr. Shishir Kumar Saxena, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s).
3. The High Court has remanded the case to the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Gwalior limited for determination of the salary and the retirement age of the accidents victim – Chhunaram Batham, who died in the accident on 23.12.2006. The petitioner’s counsel would point out that in this case, the burden is fastened on the bus owner and the driver which caused the accident primarily on the ground that the license of the bus driver was invalid (expired) on the date of the accident. According to Mr. Saxena, although the driving license had expired on 03.11.2006, since renewal fee for the driving license was deposited on 22.12.2006, the bus driver should have been considered to have had valid license, on the date of the accident.
4. On the above aspect, the High Court noticed the fact that the renewal fee was deposited on 22.12.2006, by one Rajesh but there is no clarity on the identity of Rajesh. Moreover, long back the certificate dated 12.10.2015 (Annexure P7) was issued by the RTO, Gwalior to the wife of the bus owner and yet the said certificate was not produced and was kept by the petitioner for almost 3 years and was presented abruptly only when the case was to be heard on 10.01.2019. For this reason, the High Court opined that the bus owner who was absent before the MACT and made a last ditch attempt to produce the license renewal certificate, should not be granted any relief.
5. Having considered the basis for the view taken by the High Court and upon consideration of the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner and also by Mr. Mohan Babu Aggarwal, learned counsel appearing for insurance company, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment. The Special Leave Petitions accordingly stand dismissed.
6. The sum of Rupees Ten Lakhs deposited by the petitioner in the Tribunal is made subject to the outcome of the final order to be passed by the MACT, upon the remand by the High Court.
7. Pending application(s), if any, stand closed.
(DEEPAK JOSHI) (KAMLESH RAWAT)
COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Vague 'Bad Work' Can't Presume Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Section 4 Without Evidence: Patna High Court
28 Apr 2026
Limiting Crop Damage Compensation to Specific Wild Animals Excluding Birds Violates Article 14: Bombay HC
28 Apr 2026
Appeal Limitation in 1991 Police Rules Yields to Uttarakhand Police Act 2007 on Inconsistency: Uttarakhand HC
28 Apr 2026
Nashik Court Reserves Verdict on Khan's TCS Bail Plea
29 Apr 2026
Delhi Court Grants Bail to I-PAC Director in PMLA Case
30 Apr 2026
No Historic Record of Saraswati Temple Demolition, Muslim Body Tells MP High Court in Bhojshala Dispute
30 Apr 2026
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.