Back
Jail Bars Bent for Father's Final Rites: Telangana HC Grants NIA Accused a Merciful Day Out
In a compassionate nod to family traditions amid a serious NIA probe, the has granted one-day to social activist Gade Innaiah @ Gade Inna Reddy , accused No. 1 in a case. A Division Bench of Justice K. Lakshman and Justice B.R. Madhusudhan Rao stepped in on , overriding a trial court's refusal to extend for the 15th-day funeral ceremonies of his late father.
A Father's Passing, A Son's Plea Trapped Behind Bars
The saga began when Innaiah's father, Salomon Reddy, passed away on . Detained in Hyderabad's , in NIA case RC No. 04/2025/NIA/HYD , the 64-year-old appellant sought temporary release under to perform final rites and rituals.
The , initially approved from (later adjusted to in records), imposing conditions. But when Innaiah requested an extension to for the family's 15th-day Requiem Mass, tonsure ritual, graveyard service, and blessings —backed by a Memorial Service Card —the trial court dismissed it on . This sparked Criminal Appeal No. 276 of 2026 .
The rituals followed a Christian family custom: daily Requiem Masses from the 5th to 15th day post-death, culminating in a graveyard tribute with candles, incense, holy water, and floral homage.
Clash of Customs vs. National Security Concerns
Appellant's Counsel ( for ) argued the trial court overlooked specific pleadings and evidence on the 15th-day ceremony , including sons' tonsure and family-led graveyard rites. Earlier bail covered up to the 13th day (March 12), but the 15th demanded presence, 140 km away in Regadi Thanda village.
NIA Special PP countered fiercely: Initial pleas mentioned only up to the 13th-day ceremony ; extending to the 15th contradicted prior claims. Granting more bail risked tampering in this high-stakes probe.
As reported in legal circles, the NIA stressed consistency in pleadings, but the High Court zeroed in on the non-consideration of filed material .
Why the High Court Said 'Yes' to One Day of Freedom
The Bench meticulously reviewed records, noting:
"The appellant in his application i.e., in Crl.M.P.No.443 of 2026 specifically contended that with regard to the performance of 15th day ceremony on
and the rituals to perform on the said date infact, are not considered by the learned Designated Court. The appellant also filed Memorial Service Card."
No prior precedents were invoked, but the ruling hinged on judicial duty to weigh all material , especially humanitarian pleas in bail under the stringent NIA framework. Logistical hurdles—like the 140-km distance—were addressed via strict escort protocols .
Key Observations from the Bench
"As discussed supra, the appellant... specifically contended that... the rituals to perform on the said date infact, are not considered by the learned Designated Court. The said aspects were not considered... Therefore, we are inclined to grantto the appellant herein for a period of one day i.e.,."(Para 8)
"The Superintendent,is directed to provide... He shall be taken from the jail at 06.00 AM tomorrow i.e., on... Police shall produce the appellant by 07.00 PM tomorrow."(Paras 10-11)
"The appellant shall not make any attempt to induce, threat or make any promise to any of the witnesses... shall only be allowed to attend the aforesaid 15th day ceremony of his father onwithout giving any interviews to any Media people... No slogans shall be chanted."(Paras 12, 14, 16)
A Tightly Leashed Release: Implications for Custody and Culture
The appeal was allowed , setting aside the trial order. Innaiah got escorted release on , 2026 : out at 6 AM with state and NIA officers , local police aid, strict surveillance, no witness contact, no offences, no media chats, rituals only—no peace disturbances or slogans.
This ruling underscores that even in NIA cases, courts mustn't ignore cultural-religious evidence in bail pleas. It balances security with humanity, potentially guiding future interim reliefs where family customs clash with custody. Prison authorities, NIA, and police were directed accordingly, with copies rushed via special messengers.
For the grieving son and social activist, it was a brief bridge from bars to burial rites— a reminder that law, too, honors the dead.
