Court Decision
Subject : Public Law - Right to Information
The Central Information Commission (CIC) recently addressed a series of complaints filed by
The complainant argued that the Railway Board failed to provide essential information regarding the location and identification of coaches designated for persons with disabilities and women. He emphasized that this information is crucial for individuals with disabilities, who often face challenges in accessing these facilities. The representatives from the Railway Board contended that they had not received the RTI applications or the first appeals initially, which led to delays in providing the requested information. They expressed their willingness to compile and provide the necessary information upon receiving the hearing notice from the CIC.
The CIC analyzed the arguments presented by both parties and noted that the Railway Board had not received the RTI applications or appeals at the initial stages. However, upon receiving the hearing notice, the Board acknowledged the need to provide the requested information. The Commission highlighted the importance of proactive disclosure of information related to facilities for persons with disabilities, stating that the lack of such information exacerbates the difficulties faced by individuals with disabilities in accessing public transport.
The CIC directed the Railway Board to ensure that the requested information is provided to the complainant within a specified timeframe. The Commission also issued an advisory to the Railway Board to disclose relevant information regarding accessibility for persons with disabilities in public domain, emphasizing the need for transparency and the use of technology to facilitate access to information. This ruling underscores the importance of accommodating the needs of persons with disabilities in public transport systems and the obligation of public authorities to ensure accessibility and transparency under the RTI Act.
#RTI #Accessibility #DisabilityRights #CentralInformationCommission
No Absolute Bar on Simultaneous Parole/Furlough for Co-Accused Under Delhi Prisons Rules: Delhi High Court
30 Apr 2026
Rejection of Jurisdiction Plea under Section 16 Arbitration Act Not Challengeable under Section 34 Till Final Award: Supreme Court
30 Apr 2026
'Living Separately' Under Section 13B HMA Means Cessation Of Marital Obligations, Regardless Of Residence: Patna High Court
30 Apr 2026
Consolidated SCNs under Sections 73/74 CGST Act Permissible Across Multiple FYs: Karnataka HC
01 May 2026
Allahabad HC Stays NCLT Principal Bench Order Mandating Joint Scrutiny of Allahabad Bench Filings
01 May 2026
Bombay HC Grants Interim Protection from Arrest Despite Pending Anticipatory Bail in Lower Court Due to Accused's Marriage: Sections 351(2), 64(2)(m), 74 IPC
01 May 2026
Heavy Machinery Barred in Mining Leases Except Dredging: Uttarakhand HC Directs DM to Enforce Rule 29(17) of Minor Mineral Rules
01 May 2026
No Deemed Confirmation After Probation Without Written Order Under Model Standing Orders Clause 4A: Bombay High Court
01 May 2026
CJI Declares Sikkim India's First Paperless Judiciary
01 May 2026
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.