Back
Next 
Court Decision
2024-08-31
Subject: Civil Law - Property Law
In a significant ruling by the Bombay High Court, the court addressed a civil application filed by Smt.
The applicant's counsel, Mr.
The court meticulously analyzed the arguments presented, referencing the principles established in previous Supreme Court rulings regarding the condonation of delay. It emphasized that while a liberal approach is often adopted in such cases, the conduct of the applicant was deemed negligent and lacking bona fides. The court noted that valuable rights had accrued to the respondents due to the applicant's inaction, and allowing the review would unjustly disrupt the legal standing established over the years.
Ultimately, the Bombay High Court dismissed both the civil application and the review petition, imposing costs of Rs. 50,000 on the applicant. The court underscored that the applicant's explanation for the delay was not only inadequate but also appeared to be an attempt to resile from a consent order that had been in place for over two decades. This ruling reinforces the necessity for timely legal action and the consequences of neglecting one's legal rights.
Thane Court Rejects Application to Dismiss Defamation Suit Against Digvijaya Singh Over RSS Remarks: Order VII Rule 11 CPC
06 Feb 2026
Ministry Revises Fees for Central Government Counsel Effective 2026
06 Feb 2026
Temporary Re-Employment Not Entitling Ex-Serviceman to Civil Pension: Punjab & Haryana HC
06 Feb 2026
High Courts Confirm Only 10% of Death Sentences Since 2016
06 Feb 2026
Finality in IPS Cadre Allocation Cannot Be Reopened After Decades: Supreme Court
06 Feb 2026
Patna HC Quashes Cognizance Against Minister Sans Assault Allegations
06 Feb 2026
Supreme Court Directs Trial Courts to Inform Accused of Legal Aid Rights Before Witness Examination
07 Feb 2026
Law Ministry Reveals 73% Upper Caste Judges Since 2021
07 Feb 2026
Dwivedi: British Geopolitics Created Pakistan, Not Jinnah
07 Feb 2026
The main legal point established in the judgment is that blaming the advocate for the delay in filing an appeal is not sufficient to justify condonation of delay, and a plausible explanation for the ....
The court emphasized the need to adhere to the statutory limitation period and the requirement of showing sufficient cause for delay in seeking review of judgment and decree.
The court must adopt a liberal and pragmatic approach in considering applications for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, prioritizing substantial justice over technicalities.
The court emphasizes the necessity of timely action in judicial proceedings, rejecting an unsubstantiated application for condonation of delay.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
