Back
Next 
Court Decision
2024-10-22
Subject: Disability Rights - Public Employment
In a significant ruling dated October 21, 2024, the Kerala High Court addressed a case involving
On the other hand, the PSC's counsel defended the rejection, asserting that adherence to application rules was essential for maintaining fairness in the selection process. They cited previous judgments to support their position that the PSC acted within its legal rights.
The court's analysis focused on the principles of equality and non-discrimination, emphasizing that substantive equality requires recognizing the unique challenges faced by individuals with disabilities. The judges noted that the PSC's online application process lacked adequate support for visually impaired candidates, effectively excluding them from equal participation.
The court referenced the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, and international standards on accessibility and reasonable accommodation, arguing that the PSC's failure to provide necessary adjustments constituted a violation of
Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of
Family Judge Exposes Weaponized Litigation in Custody Dispute
14 Feb 2026
Centre Notifies Two High Court Chief Justice Appointments
16 Feb 2026
Deep Chandra Joshi Appointed Acting NCLT President
16 Feb 2026
Debunking the Myth That Indians Lack Privacy Concepts
16 Feb 2026
Whose View Is It Anyway? Juniors Uncredited
16 Feb 2026
Private Property Disputes Not Human Rights Violations; HRC Lacks Jurisdiction Under PHRA: Gujarat HC
16 Feb 2026
Supreme Court Rejects Stay on RTI Data Amendments
16 Feb 2026
DIFC Court: Strong Reasons Required to Block Arbitration
17 Feb 2026
Bar Leaders Oppose High Courts Saturday Sittings
17 Feb 2026
The judgment establishes that reasonable accommodation is essential for achieving substantive equality for individuals with disabilities in public employment processes.
The court emphasized that rigid adherence to recruitment rules without considering reasonable accommodation for individuals with disabilities violates their rights under the RPwD Act.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the obligation to treat persons with disabilities with sensitivity and flexibility in procedures, as mandated by the Rights of Persons with Disa....
The court can invoke Article 142 powers to address issues related to reservation and fairness in appointments.
Rules of 2011 exempt any Government establishment from filling up vacancy by appointing persons suffering from benchmark disabilities.
Eligibility criteria for recruitment of candidates with disabilities must prioritize functional assessments and allow relaxations when no other suitable candidates are available, ensuring compliance ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
